this will be bitcoin's price action until it overtakes gold in market cap

Digital panopticon

>>60638699 (OP)
Where did you get this? Seems pretty reasonable.

>>60638731
created it myself by feeding chatgpt info

>>60638699 (OP)
The 2026 bear market will be the last ever chance to buy sub-six figure btc, that's pretty gnarly.

>>60638699 (OP)
seems pretty consistent and reasonable. next bottom is the top 2 sequences behind, with a lag and some % difference. It caught that pattern.

>>60638743
Please. The official shilling narrative is that there will never be a five digit Bitcoin ever again. Stick to the script, we need the exit liquidity.

top was in already
20k soon

>>60638699 (OP)
Please read the translation of https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergiftetes_Wachstum. I believe in 1M, but everyone should know this, too.

>>60638804
This is possible as well thanks to the ETFs and Saylormoon...not that I'm complaining :)

>>60638808
No chance. If Trump doesn't get chased out this year, we are going to see 200k. And it doesn't look like it right now, the elites want him to do some more work he can be blamed for later on. The ADL giving Musk a free pass for the Hitler salute was a clear sign, they have their marching orders, else they'd have unpersoned him.

>>60638818
The red line is supposed to be the top right? According to your chart, the tops are even higher than the OP's estimates...

>>60638824
If it goes straight to token economy, Saylor would control a single digit percentage of the world. There is just no way they are going to let them do this.

>>60638699 (OP)
Assuming that the 4 year cycle will hold indefinitely, or even just for 15 more years, is somewhat lazy.
Can you even justify this? Historically the justification was the halving, but this obviously doesn't have as much of an impact anymore, and its impact will continue to decline.
The self-fulfilling prophecy angle ("everybody expects the 4 year cycle to keep repeating forever, so it will continue to do so") may be upheld by old whales and retail traders from earlier cycles, but institutional treasury reserves and other investors continue to gain influence and are unlikely to follow this trend.
If you're going to pull in credit/interest rate/stock cycles, those occasionally follow 4 year style cycles as well, but they are nowhere near as stable as this.

>>60638851
Isn't it the combination of the halving as well as the 4 year liquidity cycle? (Which just happens to coincide with the halving)

>>60638833
The thin line is the original one, but it ignores the 2021 top completely. The official narrative being that FTX cut it short. I find that a bit improbable, I think it was a sign of saturation. Maybe Trump can compensate for that, even bring it into a more steep regime, who knows. Keep in mind that this is a log-log chart, so it's highly inaccurate on the right side.

>>60638847
>There is just no way they are going to let them do this.
He has no offspring. 'His' money and assets will end up being managed.

>>60638851
AI unemployment just might do the trick one more time.

>>60638873
he ded

>DUUUUDE NUMBER GO UP FOREVER!
Retards.

>>60638851
this is assuming the 4 year cycle wont be broken. institutions only soften the big price swings, making crashes smaller and rallies less extreme. the cycle itself, driven by those predictable supply drops and miner costs still controls bitcoin’s overall price rhythm

also too many people are aware of the 4 year cycle yet literally no one believes in it. when we went down from 109k to 75k everyone thought that was it. "15k to 109k, that was your bullrun retards" ive seen that too many times here lmao
i guarantee once btc hits 160-200k, the same crowd will be screaming supercycle and calling for 300-500k in 2026. most people are midwits and dont believe in things that only the low and high iq do (im the former)

>>60638739
can you roughly describe your prompt?

>>60638699 (OP)
btc is too mainstream now, there are even etfs now for btc. 30-40% drop max and ultimately it will go to zero sometime

>>60638902
It only stops going up when
>they turn off the money printer
>crypto exposure and use gets stabilized amongst the holdouts

Bitcoin to 30k.

>>60638699 (OP)
I like this graph. Im going to try to turn my .25 btc to a full coin. My parents also are downsizing and should come out ahead about 200k and im going to try my damnedest to convince them to put all of my portion of the inheritance in btc next bear

>>60638699 (OP)
>>60638739

People still rely on AI for answers when it has a 50% fail rate. Zoomer brainrot.

What do you guys think about the Genius Act? Good or bad for bitcoin?

>>60638699 (OP)
how are you predicting the dollar inflation?

You're not getting another dump >35%, ever again.

>>60639813
nice selfie

>>60638709
Cope from those who can't imagine a world without kyc or those who have ln derangement syndrome

>>60638833
OP suffers from recency bias

It cant be S curve adoption + diminishing returns

only midwits believe it

>$1.5M in 2037
KEK ok bobo

GPT users are midwits. gemini is the best

OP guided his little GPT to be as bearish as possible to suit OP's bias

You need a saylor like gigabull to even lift bitcoin above 100k. 1m price? May be far fetched.

>>60638847
>>60638847
>Saylor
Strategy would own that percentage, or more accurately its share holders

>>60638830
i refuse to believe anyone with higher than 90 iq unironically thinks elon gave a nazi salute

>>60638739
>>60638699 (OP)
Gas yourself, zoomie retard. What a useless bunch of shitheads, outsourcing your brains to a shitty autocomplete program.

>>60641650
Your predictions ?
If you claim that they are wrong - give us your proposition