Has anyone else noticed this? For the longest time XRP schizos and Linkies did not care about one another.

Then all of a sudden in LINK threads "XRP holders" would come in with price comparisons, and linkies went into XSG threads saying mean things to schizos for no reason.

Now half the board is just XRP-LINK feud spam.

As a linkie I hold no angst towards the schizos, they're fine by me and wagmi. In fact, I know very little about XRP, the same as I think most schizos know very little about LINK. I have no reason to trash XRP nor would I know where to begin.

Yet somehow out of nowhere all these XRP bros and LINK bros are up in arms about the other token? It doesn't make sense. This board feels like it has gone full /pol/ just a propaganda playground.

In fact, I am sure this thread will get bombarded with fake replies, but I am very confident that the shit slinging is orchestrated. The only thing I am not sure of is what the end game is.

New flash: They're all link holders.

>>60643855
checked and its this.

The reality is 90% of the real posters on this board (non shills non bots) hold link, it might even be higher than that. But a large amount of them are bored and/or demoralized and can only derive pleasure from schizo fud and larps. They will only admit it when link pumps independent of the market (assuming its breaking out), at any other time they'll maintain their fud and larps with almost perfect uptime, its impressive.

>>60643829 (OP)
Its just paid spam. Ignore it and buy real crypro!
Didnt read btw.

look at this pussy link boyscout waving the white flag because link is getting decimated

>>60643908
I am up way more than XRP holders I'm not worried about feeling "decimated", what I want to know is do you even know what you're being paid for? Or they don't tell you that?

>>60643866
anytime anyone tried correcting a fidget holder, they go into stupid hysterics. Chainlink is basically a glaring example of how Ripple failed to achieve their initial objective (taking over the banks i.e swift). When pointing this out, they went insane, and their paid shillers went into full damage control mode. And so Chainlink became this evil thing to a good portion of them, when in reality they were just being informed of their duplicitous company.

diehard xrp holders are extremely stupid. they can't see the writing on the wall. they see themselves as a top 3 asset in the future. they hate anything that threatens them, and unfortunately as some others have pointed out, all the late poors who missed a generational bottom shit on link out of spite for oldfags.

>>60643938
>>60643926
woah there buddy, you're being too rational for these parts... i think you need to just have a bit of a laugh at them instead. sure you can point out the obvious, but that makes them make a new thread or pretend to be a different person. it's more fun to just laugh at them and make them a lil angry hehe. we're all here to make gains at the end of the day, don't get your panties twisted up uwu

>>60643938
honestly anybody in this space who doesn't recognize that chainlink has a data monopoly in web3 (and why that's a good thing) is a fucking paid shill

Heey heeey heeyyy

>>60643829 (OP)
Its just banter. Don't get your panties in a twist. Even as an XRP maxi idgaf if LINK catches up or passes us. We bought into similar but different narratives. We're both winning.

>>60643855
I can confidently say I've never held a LINK and thats the honest truth. I simply don't beleive in it. LINK holders can't hurt you because LINK isn't real.

I don't normally venture out beyond /xsg/

Linkies were raiding at least 5 years ago when I was on here more often. I don't really care about the shit other than it is annoying in the threads.

>>60643829 (OP)
when prominent chainlink advocates are constantly and directly attacking ripple unprovoked, this is exactly what you get

>>60644082
they're just lemmings they come here for all their info, they're probably in this thread right now. They feed off the energy here, they are victims of the coordinated fud attacks on both sides. "Useful idiots" I believe is the term.

>>60643855
Checked and fpbp.
I larp as an Xrp holder to shit on Link holders. I also hold Link.

>>60644071
>I simply don't beleive in it
https://www.westpaciq.com.au/thought-leadership/2025/07/project-acacia-next-steps-for-the-future-of-money

lol Sure ting buddy

>>60643829 (OP)
The problem with XRP is that it's too ambitious. It would be great if every single bank was on board to replace swift with the XRPL and actually integrated it. If they're counting on everyone using their ledger and nothing else, they delusional. If they want to be a chain in a network of chains, they must integrate chainlink and face fierce competition.
It's too much of a gamble for my tastes. Suit yourselves, though.

>>60643829 (OP)
Everyone with half a brain knows Ripple and Chainlink are going to suddenly switch ranks.
This is frustrating to both sides, hence the friction.

>>60643829 (OP)
I think it did arise organically though. For a long time, link holdes would compare the utility of xrp vs link, illustrating the disparity in price despite inversely correlated utility between the two tokens, ie xrp basically does nothing of value and never will, while link will actually be used in a protocol that major banking players are actively integrating. Yet xrp is top 3, and link barely clings to top 20. Naturally this caused xrp holders to feel insecure in their standing, as they don't ever actually get any institutional confirmation of their tokens value, whereas linkies get it constantly. The feud emerges from the clown market paradox.

>>60644117
>>60644318
these

>>60643829 (OP)
You are retarded.
Since the day I came here I have witnessed linktards shitting up the board with as many threads as possible, constantly mentioning XRP without saying "XRP". They would say ponzi or scam or whatever and make it really obvious they were talking about XRP. Constantly talking about us like we're some guy that never called after a one night stand.

and here you are trying to convince people that it's a conspiracy. Pathetic.

>>60643829 (OP)
Yes. Just stop replying to them and let the bots spam each other. Its as constructed as it gets. I hold link and i dont care enough to even know what xrp does, ofcourse i dont bother spending time fudding it? Its just jewish niggers trying to create yet another division. Rise above

>>60643829 (OP)
These are two scams fighting to catch the simple-minded with the "BANKS, BANKS!! BANKS FUUUUCK" speech.

>>60644117
>>60644318
cargo cult behavior, the linkies think their inane ramblings will somehow manifest into reality

>>60643829 (OP)
Ripple vs Link goes back to 2017. See: the hand drawn picture of the link cube with muscly arms holding the xrp fidget spinner wearing a chastity cage. There was comparison between the Link SIBOS event versus that basement event Ripple put on as well.

>>60644362
Which part of my post did not make sense to you?

>>60643829 (OP)

not all memes are cartoons

Yes, I suspect that they know link will only be used for oracles and data security, making the token itself less needed, thus the price won't go up as much as xrp cause it will actually be used, so they are using link to gatekeep people.

>>60643829 (OP)
4chan loves console wars

>>60643829 (OP)
Yes, it's been done by LINKies for years. No one cares about them.
I never once go in a LINK thread, yet there they are in every thread I'm in.

Now I think some XRPsisters are trolling back the other way, but the inorganic bs was CL for years and years.
They CAN'T STAND that we do it for free.

>>60643938
>>60643972
>>60643997
>totally not a choreographed link discussion
This is what we are dealing with.

However I do hold LINK as the first poster said. Just in 1 to 100 ratio with my standard given the odds of actually making money that I factor in.

>>60644105
>sets his sights on bare minimum achievement
ngmi
You shoot for the stars and landing on the moon is not a failure.

I like my coffee like I like my women, without some other guy's dick in it.

where are all the xrp haters nowadays anyways

>>60643926
>I am up way more than XRP
Holding what exactly?
Can't be LINK, that's for fucking sure.

>>60645067
You know when most of use bought LINK both LINK and XRP where under $1 right?

Link's Success means XRP's Demise.

>>60644882
If people like you are serious (and I believe some of them are), its essentially like the difference between Trump diehards who think withholding the Epstein files is some 5d chess shit, the typical qanon r/thedonald poster who migrated here and is still pro civ-nat and other cucked ideologies, and those who get the JQ and realized that its just redjew vs bluejew.

Which is funny because there's a 1:1 overlap in my personal circle of people who are qanon boomer trump supporters who will ignore the JQ and handwave the Epstein files, and people who hold XRP. Literally the only people I know IRL who discuss crypto, 3 old q anon boomer types, all have tried to convince me to buy XRP, all believe everything Trump says and scared to name the jew. Its eery what a hold certain media has on them whether it be crypto advertising or politics.

>>60645546
Not really, link could go parabolic and it's services the most used in crypto (OH wait they already are) and XRP could still get some customers

>>60645591
Shit XRP could have zero customers and still have good price action. Look at most of the rest of the top projects in crypto. At this point in time the market is almost entirely a house of cards, that's why I fear there is still a massive crash to come before link can rise, but its possible it just swims to the top of the trash heap.

>>60643829 (OP)
usually post this and they get mind broken lol

>>60645674
Very nice anon, I have like 1200 in rewards so far (450 from 0.1 that I restaked and 750 from 0.2 that are claimable). On the one hand the idea that a 10-20x gets me a middle class passive income for the rest of my life is kind of exciting, and 10-20x is conservative for where we're going long term. On the other hand, I have to imagine staking 1.0 won't be that lucrative if the price action is nice, since price and rewards will have an inverse correlation until it finds an equilibrium.

>>60645705
Well, just imagine that we have 1k+ link in rewards alone from one single price feed. Audit for new build rewards just finished so another couple thousands of dollars just waiting for us to claim lol the best part is I just had to wait.

>>60645891
Yeah but its all still subsidized. 1.0 is going to be dependent on the free market, ie nodes competing against other nodes for your link, but they're only going to give you enough that its still profitable for them to do so. What that number is is completely unknown and though some anons have done guesswork, I don't think anything can be accurately predicted yet.

But in simple terms, if the price goes up nodes will pay less for your link because it will be more profitable for them to just dump some link, while when the price goes down, they'd pay more since they'd make it back in rewards. All in theory of course.

>>60643938
This but change xrp to link and link to xrp and you have the correct story.

>>60646008
Why do you guys do this? It was funny when this board was alive and you could fool redditors, now it just comes across like old men still laughing at rick rolls.

>>60646019
They have trouble with reality
>they see themselves as a top 3 asset in the future.
XRP is top 3. Its linkers who see link as a top 3

Its just a bunch of paid advocates spewing half truths and trying to stir up shit and argue semantics. XRP at 3 burns their eyes out and it shows. I myself hold link but thank god its my third biggest bag after xrp and xlm.

>>60646081
>"top 3 asset in the future"
>"in the future"

learn to read retard

>>60645967
yeah i dont give a shit about all that since i'll be making money doing nothing. sergey fucking nazarov just spoke to the president of the free world a couple of months ago live theres no fud left just late fags and retarded niggers that got scalped by bancor and lpl tards

>>60646105
Future is now i guess.

>>60644903
Wow at that lineup!!!!

>>60644903
why is Ripple doing this to themselves?

>>60643829 (OP)
I held both. Last cycle. When there were actual gains. Enjoy your 2-3x retards

>>60643829 (OP)
>>60643866
>>60643855
It is literally just a reaction to 6 years of this shit from linkies doing the exact same thing, accompanied by a pump in XRP price. You guys are like fucking jews with the projection. You have a consistent stream of multiple anti-XRP threads for years and years and the second the exact same is done to you you cry blood libel and scream about muh pogrums. It is so insufferable it is insane. Also link is being continuously displayed as literally not being needed or used in the products CLL are building.
>>60644082
Exactly,

>>60643926
XRP is beating link across every time horizon. We are up like 700% since last December. Lol You are down 50% from 4 years ago. GRUESOME

>hold xrp and link
>og skitzo xrp general revolutionary poster
>made tonnes of link memes
funnily i fud xrp yet seethe at link fudders

>>60644117
Linkies are the only ones that refuse to get granular debating the tech when called out and pivot to repeated desperate rhetorical strategies to mask it, which is all anyone shoould need to know. Challenge the XRP thesis and you instantly have 3-4v people who know it cold being substantive as fuck. Pretty easy canary in the coalmine.

>>60648501
>spoonfeed me please

>>60648501
It’s funny because I’ve been browsing /biz/ since 2018 and have observed exactly the opposite. But surely you yourself can elaborate that XRP thesis and pwn the linkies.

>>60648518
I have been here since /biz/ was formed. It isn't, you are just uncritically fixated with huge blinders on. I bought link years ago and sold in 2018 when all other original fags did when everything crashed. I bought back in but sold again when it became obvious link was not building to incentivize token use in core products and was emphasizing facilitating price data rather than storing or moving value.Have held XRP since around same time and bought back again in 2020.

>>60648508
It isn't spoonfeeding. Thread after thread they refuse to address real criticism but spend hours and days spamming rhetoric emotionally. It is not a lack of effort thing to be sure-it is cult tier shit. Link before the 2018 crash was a tech knowing commuhnity and probably the top coin on this board.It has gone the way of bitcoin and been cultified by late normies and consensus culture cucks

>>60648558
What is one implementation of XRPL I am look at right now that has an institution partner?

How does IPL work with XRPL? I am familiar with burn or lock and mint.

Why would a derivative exchange run exclusively on XRPL vs private in house ( ie a Coinbase but with an internal ledger to allow interoperability of the RWA nft)

Thanks

>>60648558
it is the same old tired fud day after day there is nothing to say to them that hasn't been already, why waste your time like that

>>60648582
Bank Social literally joined Ripplenet like 2 months ago. The ex-CEO of SBI Ripple Asia left to help head a treasury strategy that SBI is collaborating with in so doing, built around XRP specifically that is being headed also by the crowned prince of Dubai through a billion space company (VivoPower) that is traded on the NASDAQ. Wellgistics in the US did same wrt XRP Healthcare, and so did Webus in China. All in the last few months. ONDO announced they were tokenizing OUSG on the XRPL, included XRPL in their organizational schematic of networks built-into their system, and Archax announced XRPL for tokenization of Treasuries. The European Central Bank announced partnership with Axiology (which is built on a permissioned version of the XRPL) for its Digital Euro. And every existing Ripple customer kept using XRP, and new customers accelerated since Trump was elected at an unprecedented rate. Can list more if you want? Lol Pic related is the crowned prince of Dubai in his own words in the press release announcing the XRP strategy. SBI also use XRP extensively in multiple divisions and are building their entire crypto strategy around it.
>IPL
Do you mean ILP? If so, see this archive for a granular description:
https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60617641#p60624320
If not, let me know.
>Exchange
See (especially last link):
https://archax.com/insights/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of-tokenized-real-world-assets-to-the-xrp-ledger
Archax is the first ever digital securities exchange regulated by the FCA in London:
https://archax.com/insights/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of-tokenized-real-world-assets-to-the-xrp-ledger
See also:
https://archax.com/insights/archax-adds-state-street-fidelity-international-lgim-offerings-to-regulated-digital-platform

https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/09/16/bitstamp-and-ripple-to-launch-derivatives-exchange-on-xrp-ledger/

>>60648582
>Exchange cont.
Some may launch on private walled gardens but those walled gardens still settle on the public ledger in liquidity bridging between walled gardens or public and private, but launching on public additionally kills counterparty risk dramatically, sanctions potential, allows more free flow of capital in and out and allows for assets to be liquid to each other cross-issuer using XRP as liquidity bridge etc.

>>60648582
Forgot to include:
https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/07/16/xrp-ledger-to-star-in-ripple-ctrl-alt-deal-to-tokenize-dubai-real-estate

These are literally all just the last few months worth and off the top of my head and don't even mention the new EVM etc.

>>60648658
You write like a complete retard.
Trying to read this shit reminds me of those debate negresses https://youtu.be/fmO-ziHU_D8?t=36

>>60648907
let me paint a picture for you instead then

bump for link marines

>>60648907
t. Exactly who I said fills the threads defending link exactly how I said they defend it, this time adding a layer of projection.

>>60648658
Thanks for links, they’re interesting even if old. The ILP 4chan archive was not informative, and the ILP website reads like a brochure for the illiterate boomer that won’t know better. Nothing live either that I can interact with? Sure seems ghostly.

>>60649233
He writes braindead paragraphs like that to hide the fact that Ripple has nothing going on.
Ripple itself says banks don't want to work with them.

you:
>>60648501
>Linkies are the only ones that pivot to desperate rhetorical strategies

also you:
>>60648658
>The ex-CEO of SBI Ripple Asia left to help head a treasury strategy that SBI is collaborating with in so doing, built around XRP specifically that is being headed also by the crowned prince of Dubai through a billion space company (VivoPower) that is traded on the NASDAQ.

You have to be a massive retard to shill Ripple, and it shows.

>>60649307
They might have something going on, worth exploring whether or not. Chainlink at least has swapper with Mastercard. Ethereum at least has aave. Hell even solana has bridges and L2s I’ve interacted with.

>>60643829 (OP)
Is link still an eth coin

>>60649325
>They might have something going on
They don't.
They have zero traction in Defi even though the XRPL has the oldest DEX in crypto.
And as Ripple itself admits, they have no traction at all with banks either.

So what's left? Their stablecoin? Everyone is making their own too.

>>60648907
Nice argument!
Owned him!

watch him cook up another atrocious runon paragraph

>>60649320
You failed to point out a way in which I was using a rhetorical strategy by pointing out the billion dollar NASDAQ company based treasury strategy headed by a representative of the joint company formed by Ripple and SBI (the bank which makes decisions for 82% of total Japanese banking assets as head of the consortium, largest outside shareholder in Ripple (SBI), which use XRP for numerous branches of their business and is basing their general crypto strategy around XRP) and THE CROWNED PRINCE OF DUBAI (the Switzerland/Singapore of the middleeast (which XRP is one of the first handful approved digital assets in for banking and so now is RLUSD and Ripple one of the first handful of companies with a VASP to operate there)), which, the official government of Dubai's Land Department also chose XRP to tokenize property deeds. How is this a desperate rhetoric strategy?" He asked for real implementations. You are just flipping shit and employing same desperate rhetoric games because you have no argument because what I said's true. You literally don't care about reality you just want to signal support for your uncritically chosen and adhered to token team.

>>60643829 (OP)
perhaps we should be...friends?

>>60649374
called it >>60649524

>>60649233
Literally everything listed in the paragraph was within the last 4 months alone. You specifically asked about exchanges so I gave the existent projects being built which are like a year old max. The archive is literally granular on the level of describing how packets are processed on ILP with a link to a presentation BY Interledger in the thread describing it. Severall paragraphs written by me personally. You are being exactly the type of disingenuous faggot I described in the least clever way imaginable. Why not just admit you were wrong and reposition? Why miss out on the moment just to feel less insecure for a little bit longer and live resentful pretending you wereactually right somehow despite reality not agreeing with you through the objective metric of value? Why be such a snivveling backhanded dishonest fag?

>>60649533
Describe how it is a "desperate rhetorical strategy" or admit you can't because ut;s not and you are actually projecting and being exactly what I said you were.

>>60649542
Stop talking to him. His name is biepum and he has been doing this since XRP was 50c and below. I was the anon talking to him about the decentralisation discusison here.

>>60648658
>Do you mean ILP? If so, see this archive for a granular description:
>https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60617641#p60624320

There is nothing to gain with him. He is paid fud/shilling and most likely an advocate. Fishy/CLG tier etc.

He holds link and BTC and instead of enjoying life he is terminally online. Do not waste time on this individual, he is very unhinged and unstable.

>>60649542
>Describe how it is a "desperate rhetorical strategy"

You're writing huge runon paragraphs with disjointed sentences, retarded namedrops (lol nasdaq) and constant errors.
Either you're inhumanly stupid or you want people to just give up debating.

>>60649554
Definitely true and appreciated. Just posting for others to see.

>>60649554
>>60649566

Samefag harder

terminally online linkbaggie thinks everyone is the same person

>>60649570
>Samefag harder

>>https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60617641#p60624320
We were literally both posting at the same time yesterday in this thread.

Are you projecting again?

>>60649554
>terminally online

>>60649575
>terminally online

totes not samefagging some more

I hold both XRP and LINK. My XRP bag is 50x my LINK bag now, but both cryptos can win in the end. Why aren't people backing both the horses?

>>60649585
I have witnessed the downward spiral you are in. Go outside and touch grass, none of this matters. Unless its literally your job, that would explain everything.

>>60649586
We all are , except for
This tribalist retard. >>60649585

>>60649593
>Go outside and touch grass, none of this matters. Unless its literally your job

whatever you say, Thomas

>>60649599
I am not that brownoid lmao. Severe case of apophenia or you are just becoming psychotic.

>>60649611
>I am not that brownoid
You absolutely are.
You're this board's resident Link fudder who is clinically obsessed with fishy and clg.
You know, the guy who posts his own twitter caps and then talks to himself for a dozen posts.

Nice to know you're a rabid cripple shill kek

>>60649618
I am not, but you, biepum, are literally doing the same for XRP. I also know how I can really rile you up:

Your hubris will be your downfall.

>>60649640
>Your hubris will be your downfall.
Yup, that's another one of your signature lines when you post your own twitter caps.

Here's a nice example of what you do every single day, this one thread has all your hallmarks: https://warosu.org/biz/thread/S60112133

>post your own twitter cap
>price comparison
>bring up clg/fishy/barrett/...
>call clg "your god"
>"hubris was your downfall"
>"THE cuckolds of crypto"
>no actual engagement for the thread and then it dies

This has been your job and your life for the past few years.
And now we know it's all because you're a mentally deranged Cripple.

>>60649709
You are in a very bad place mentally and extremely unwell.
I can 100% say I am not adem, but you would not believe as you see him everywhere.

Now post the collage.

>>60649731
You're probably one of the very the biggest spammers 4chan has ever had, you know that right?

>>60649742
That would be correct if i actually was the guy you think i am. I am not however.
I believe you earn that title. Project again, like clockwork. You post so much and so similar you have become very easy to identify.

>>60643829 (OP)
You wanna know why? I hold over 20 zerps, might be over 30, might be over 40k, that's not the point.
I won't say my exact number as I'm sure most of you wouldn't either..

My point, is that even though I have my XRP make it bags packed, I saw the conviction of the stinkers and thought, if they have as much conviction about link as we do about XRP, then they might know something we don't. So I scooped up 20 link just in case.

How many link holders hold any amount of XRP? Every time I see a portfolio being posted on this site, it almost never has XRP in it. I think, are they stupid or just ignorant? But then I see the way they talk about XRP like it's a joke. Like it could never ever happen. Did you ever think, "maybe the schizos know something I don't" or did you just call them schizos and shit on their coin? Because we thought of you that way. I definitely wondered if you were right and I was wrong, but did you ever if you were wrong, and I was right? That's called humility. That's called being humble, and if you're not humble, then you deserve every bit of ridicule that comes your way. We waited years for this, getting shit on by you people every step of the way, now it's time for my victory lap. And I WILL, take my victory lap. And you are going to like it.

>>60649742
hi fishy

>>60649753
>>60649775
This is your 4th ID that we know of so far kek

>>60649565
Aren't random. There are regulatory and capital requirements for listing on exchanges like NASDAQ. Qualifying VivoPower as a billion dollar NASDAQ traded stock is important because you would write it off as a "literal who" if I didn't, despite it being a venture with SBI and the literal fucking crowned prince of Dubai. How is me writing poorly according to you a "desperate rhetorical strategy" when every thing I list is true and you refuse to address it. You are a low IQ person to argue this.
>>60649570
Not samefagging. Cope, you weird specific coin obsessive.

>>60649782
they are different people you psychotic clown.

>>60649585
>terminally online
>13 pbtid
>in every thread that mentions XRP or link
>Still no argument but endless projection adn sophistry characterized like exactly what I said in my first post.

>>60648464
Head canon. For years and years LINK and XRP holders barely interacted. This only started happening when the lawsuit was dropped and XRP pumped end of 2024.

>>60649798
You must be casual or new because Link faggots have brigaded every single thread that mentions XRP for several years. It is endless and completely insubstantial nothing and insufferable emotional ejaculation stemming from terminal butthurt which mirrors when leftists get mad and act like animals, literally every single time.

>>60649789
>Aren't random.
Nowhere does my post say the word "random".

>You are a low IQ person
Says the guy who can't read or write properly.

>>60649797
>>13 pbtid
Now do yours.

>>60649585
Sorry I mistaked your ID please disregard:
>>60649797

I am just about to head into work on very little sleep. Misunderstood who was saying what.

>>60649806
Please see
>>60649809

>>60649742
He definitely is. I would genuinely bet literally THE biggest by far.

>the gish galloping verbose midwit who accuses everyone else of rhetorical tactics is STILL rambling on like a retard
Lolololol

>>60649805
Nope. XRP was relegated to a single thead (XSG) and this board barely had any other XRP threads made for quite some time. I think you fail to remember (if you were even here) how little interest XRP garnered on /biz/ outside of the general. To say linkies were making XRP fud threads daily is just plain insanity because any and all XRP discussions were done in the general. I'll concede that XSG probably had it's resident fudder as well (this biepum guy) but you're way off the mark otherwise.

>>60649825
correct

>>60649823
>Gish gallop
>strawman
>ad hominem
>word salad

Faggots who don't know informal logic always use these terms like they are arbitrary-meaning terms that qualify automatic argument win and dismissal of th other if applied with zero basis to using them or qualification of them. I am not gish galloping. I was asked to provide something and did. Gish galloping is when you in a debate setting throw a bunch of claims at someone they could not reply to in the time of the debate or which would be unreasonable to make them reply to in any amount of time. We are in a relatively time unlimited casual forum discussion and I am not burying you in claims. I made a list of examples of things he asked for. You are the biggest midwit yet. Stop projecting and using words you don't understand to compensate with not having an argument. They aren't arbitrary literary devices, they actually have specific meaning.

>>60649836
see (it applies to you too):
>>60649840

>>60649845
I am not biepum, go to bed lol.

>>60648479
cripple is the same price as it was in 2018 and a year prior both link and cripple were 15 cents....

>>60649825
Over the last several years, there have been constant streams of XRP threads posted by link fags specifically to antagonize and stir shit. You can claim this as not being true but it absolutely is and anyone who has been here even remotely seriously will know you are full of shit just from that statement. The general actually is probably the least of it outside portal faggot and the one specific obsessive literal schizo. Every time there is a new news involving link no matter how minor providing price feeds to some big name to zero benefit of token holders, 3-4 prodding threads are made directed at XRP. Whenever a good news XRP thread is posted it is brigaded endlessly in the same uncritical, say nothing substantial but sling emotional shit way. This is absolutely undeniable.

>>60649782
the funniest part is that fishy is the one if hopping like a maniac from his phone kek

>>60649856
Lol You mean from the single point when everything pumped simultaneously and link was like $58 (what is it now again? Lol)? You sure you wanna make that the baseline of all baselines to compare to?

>>60649868
This seems to make you angry

>>60649806
My brother please let me know you saw >>60649809 if still in thread. I feel bad having mistaked you for other green id and don't want to think you thought I was lashing out at you randomly because that was not my intention. Not sure how I am unable to write properly but get if you were just clapping back and definitely apparently cannot read properly for sake of making the mistake in the first place.

>>60649870
You seem to have been called the fuck out for comparing us being above where we were at that point when you guys are down 50% from where you were at the exact same point. Lmfao Holly shit what a fail

>>60649880
Well it's just a simple fact that both cripple and link shared the same price for quite some time.

>>60649892
another simple fact is that XRP has vastly outperformed LINK in the last 5 years AND all time
how does that simple fact make you feel?

>>60649892
COPE OF THE FUCKING CENTURY. XRP is up 700% since last December. Link is flat over the last like 6 years. XRP has 100x as many tokens as link does, is #3 in marketcap. Link isn't even in the top 10 anymore and CLL aren't even incentivizing its use at all as anything other than you giving them corporate welfare to subsidize their private software business.

>>60649901
Not much considering they were both 15 cents and one is nearly $18 while the other is $3.5

>>60649910
Doubling down on it. Lmao Once more see:
>>60649907

>>60649907
That's alright and all, however they were both 15 cents.......I'm just a man that buys the better deal is all and Link is a bigger number now.

>>60649914
That doesn't mean fucking anything you economically illiterate moron. COPE. Why has XRP ascended marketcap rank and total since that time and link has fallen?

>>60649916
So it did all that to reach less than $4?

>>60649910
QNT and LINK shared the same price as well, how about that? do you constantly seethe over not swapping LINK for QNT? if not, why should the XRP holders care about that? especially if they are legit early adopters, with a significantly higher ROI than LINK ever provided
your posts are nonsensical, I'm sorry

>>60649920
You are Yuri Bezmenov's demoralized man but you let yourself get there in terms of greed to a specific coin instead of moral ideology. This is an unbelievable failure of being. It is hard to think of something more pathetic

>>60649927
I don't care about Quant

>>60649930
Do you care about reality even remotely?

>>60649930
then why do you care about XRP?

>>60649929
Look it seems you're just bad with numbers?

>>60649934
Well this gentleman claimed xrp beats link on all time horizons for price. I simply had to correct him as this isn't true.

>>60649939
The price of link is higher now than XRP is. Wtf are you talking about. I said it beats it as a rate of return across LITERALLY any timeline up to now. You are literally innumerate.

>>60649942
No because they were both 15 cents

>>60649935
This is like Helen Keller saying her teacher is bad seeing words.

>>60649939
when LINK and XRP shared the same price, XRP had already a massive ROI
he's absolutely right

>>60649948
yes but LINK got there from 11 cents, while XRP went there from 0.0002
are you legitimately mentally handicapped?

>>60649865
For years XRP was so down in the dumps with no news and 0 price action that besides the general there we had no XRP threads. Those "threads prodding at xrp" are just normal board behavior when there is any news, positive or negative, and even then for years we didn't have any of those because there was barely any news besides lawsuit stuff (which didn't interest /biz/ in the slightest until the big news).

If a few threads here and there over the years got you feeling like this, imagine what happens if LINK ever gets back to ath. Board will literally be unusable.

>>60649954
>>60649951
>>60649960
(Time of purchase 2017)
>XRP: .15 to $4
>LINK: .15 to $19

>>60649948
That doesn't matter and of all the threads I've been in, unless you are LITERALLY retarded (which would explain your investment decision), this is by far the best and most insane example of what I was originally talking about I have ever seen. Would you rather pay face value and trading fees to buy a commemorative coin that doesn't appreciate across 6 years or buy a coin at face value for a cheaper price that increases in value by 7 times in the last year? This is not difficult and not something you don't understand. It is something if you don't understand you are retarded beyond argument and if you do, you are still retarded for thinking there is room to be sophistically persuasive within this line of argument and objection. It is LITERALLY the worst economic argument I have ever seen on this board and deepest cope of all time.

>>60649970
Price higher more money more happy better investment

>>60649962
>are just normal board behavior
and shitting on LINK after 5 years of shitty pa and so many broken promises isn't?
cognitive dissonance: the community

>>60649965
great, that doesn't change anything

>>60649965
You mean EXACTLY when link launched with a $32M marketcap when XRP had a marketcap of $6 billion? Are you joking? HAHAHAHHA

>>60649974
3Have you ever taken an IQ test?

>>60649989
Yes. At that moment Link forever became a better investment.

>>60649980
I don't consider having anywhere from 5 to 10+ fud threads up during a slow bear market normal, no. Board was hibernating except for LINK fuddies it seemed.

>>60649996
Lmfao Nothing else needs to be said. People lurking to decide what investments to consider: behold. Lol

>>60650010
How come you keep giving me these wonderful paragraphs then ;)

>>60650004
That literally started in response to the endless shit you throw at everyone, particularly XRP community. The only people worse are the UBER-btc maxis. You guys are the jews of crypto.

>>60650012
That 2 sentences is not a paragraph. Neither is this 2 sentences.

Heading out anons. Enjoy the thread!

>>60650015
>y-you started it
XRP community was relegated to XSG. The two communities barely interacted. Next you'll tell me ADA fags will be coming for LINK too for come uppance if they catch a pump lmao.

>>60650022
>Anon heads out after crisping his keyboard with 40pbtid paragraphs

The thesaurus wielding retard in this thread holds link in case you’re all wondering. This is his little shtick

>>60650004
yes, because the cognitive dissonance of the linkie is well documented

>>60650015
>the endless shit you throw at everyone
t. 40 pbtid fudding Link

>>60650022
Checked

>>60644903
I'm a retarded stinky and ignore all the ripple stuff. This is the first time I've looked at the ripple side of this graphic. Sandy Kaul is speaking at the ripple conference?? She was all over Chainlink the past few years.

>>60649585
Leave that nigga alone, yes he samefags but he's a LINK holder who somehow got ropped into buying XRP (along with all other "ISO" coins). I think he's pretty new and just likes coping by writting yuge paragraphs. He'll learn.

>>60652711
Checked. Yes, understand that "muh speakers" is not an argument. Neither for link nor for xrp. All speakers at these conferences are bought and paid for.

>>60652808
Yes, for sure. I understand they are bought and paid for, just found it surprising. I have watched a lot of Sandy's interviews, she truly believes in this stuff. She was recently on with Scott Melker talking about how everything is going to be in a "crypto" wallet at some point in the near future. All of your assets and accounts are going to be tokenized. I'd be interested in hearing her ripple talk, I'd wager it won't involve much XRP.

hey guys great thread
though't i'd swing by

this >>60649640
>>60649709
back and forth was hilarious

for the record i started the hubris line on biz, but apparently have copycats now lmfao

imitation is the best form of flattery

>>60649939
>>60649965
>>60649970
>>60649970

no need to argue back and forth. here's the facts:

xrp is up 7x since last fall
link is down
link is also down from where it was 5 years ago

>>60652769
>who somehow got ropped into buying XRP

yeah man it really sucks getting roped into a 7x, i don't know how he sleeps at night