>if satoshi nakamoto dumps all his gorillion bitcoin the price will crash
>b-but he just wont do that because... he just wont ok???
bitcoin is literally a ticking time bomb

>>60661247 (OP)
THIS. are we seriously to believe that all of satoshi's family members just have the same mindset as him? no that's ridiculous. eventually someone that knew satoshi will find a way to get to those btc and sell it for themselves regardless of his morals.

>>60661247 (OP)
ok, so why would he (if he stills alive, of course) do it? why would he destroy his creation? are you that retarded to put your personal benefit instead of something that can actually change the humanity? lol

and then maxis say bitcoin isnt centralised when this ambigious entity called satoshi nakamoto filled its own bags at launch and holds 5% of the total supply. which is the exact same thing other crypto projects do but you call them centralised. couple that with the few other entities who hold a shitload of it and tell me how that shit is decentralised and how your own penny bags are not totally compromised and ready to blow up at any moment.

>>60661253
the morals don't matter, just the possibilities.
maybe it's CIA, or maybe he hates michael saylor.

>>60661253
>ok, so why would he (if he stills alive, of course) do it?
why wouldnt "he" you dont even know if its a "he" or "she" or an organisation or the cia or whatever the fuck.
you dont even know who youre talking about and youre trying to guess what this unknown entity is going to do.
>why would he destroy his creation?
it wouldnt destroy it it would just crash the price and lets not kid ourselves, every bitcoin maxi holds bitcoin to make gains, not because they worship and believe in le blockchain technology.

We have to wait until the U.S. Government goes all in because Epstein rugged Bear Stearns which rugged everyone in '08. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

>>60661253
>are you that retarded to put your personal benefit instead of something that can actually change the humanity?
i mean how can you say something like this and then claim not to be a fanatic

>>60661257
That is something different, and I respect THAT point of view, but if I, or any of us were satoshi, we probably have thought on what to do to prevent things like that, it's even more easy when you have a shit ton of trillions of dolars. Yet it is possible of course, but Satoshi knew BTC would be 1M from the start, if he could predict something so specific then i'm not worried about it

>>60661270
if he knew btc would be a million bucks why would he keep ~5% out of circulation forever and never use it or allow others to use it?

>>60661270
yes satoshi could have prevented all of this by simply not owning over 1 million coins.
i've never read an answer for why he held on to so many. why not give them away, etc.

>>60661268
That's where you miss it, I'm not a fanatic or even invest in BTC. But even I understand how devs are trying to make the new frontier, web3.0. Not only for payments or "money" but a new era of internet, and all of that started with Satoshi, to me it's even bigger than money, but for others it's just "not only about money", but future. When you are able to do that then you are actually changing the world in some way.

>>60661291
>>60661273
To me it's to have power. Same as Musk, he doesn't have those $320B in his hands but that kind of wealth can only buy you one thing; Power in elites

of course I can and probably I am wrong, but it's what i do believe.

>Satoshi dumps his 1,000,000 BTC
>Price dumps 95%
>Satoshi's 1,000,000 BTC are gobbled up by Saylor Moon and Blackcock.
>Price stablizes and starts going backup
>Price continues forever number go up because there is still only 21,000,000 BTC in existence and with even less available for us plebs.

>>60661311
and youre cool with your bitcoin holding losing 95% of its value?

>>60661315
Yeah.

>>60661317
well, im not, so

>>60661317
Yep it's an amazing opportunity to break even by age 80 or possibly when you are dead. Wow!

>>60661323
he's full of shit. Plus if it actually went -95% in today's context, it's not going to recover.

>>60661302
yeah but bitcoin is supposed to be an escape from the elites and their bank printing.

now there's a looming cloud of a 5% dev wallet.
at some point bitcoin code needs to be upgraded/forked just to prevent anyone from accessing these coins.

how much will it actually crash though?

>>60661291
the million coins prove the network's security, my dear goblins. it likely won't change for that reason.

>be american glowniggers
>create bitcoin as an experiment or escape route from jews, Britishers and their fiat tricks
>its tokenomics make it better than anything in the world
>know it's going to moon
>realize only schizo chads are going to be able to hold on to this
>decide that those peope will inherit the world
>fud the hell out of it all the time to scare normgroids away
>leave the million coins as proof and as a threat
>even when bitcoin is 99% of the way to complete adoption there will still be bobos to fuel pumps because they're afraid of "Satoshi" selling "his" coins

>>60661347
>glowies and jews not being one and the same

>>60661347
the CIA likes me? :3

>>60661353
>Thinking everyone is on one side
Just like the Marvel capeshit movies + WW2 foundation myth lore have taught you.

satoshi should have gone with 1%. this would be a non-issue.
5% is solana memecoin jeet tier.

>>60661347
why would a government want anti-establishment libertarians to be rich?

>>60661361
political parties are a front for the dominant faction of elites. To think all elites want the same thing and completely agree with each is to deny or bet against game theory. Unironically, go play Deus Ex

besides that, most anti-establishmentarians of today are the system's stooges and gatekeepers of tomorrow. Want proof, look at the (fake and gay) hippie movement.

using the pareto principle, 20% of elites are responsible for vast majority of policy. that makes their number even smaller

One of the best attacks against them would be to create bitcoin and nurture a network of supporters. this redistributes wealth and power in a peaceful way

now go on jewtube and look at some goyslop from fox. every week I see trump offspring shilling the corn. Does that sound like what i'm describing above?

if they want to keep winning they are gonna have to pay the due to us millennials who have to vote them in (regardless of who they are). and that means pumping bitcoin kek. The population isn't increasing in meaningful ways. We are tomorrow's boomers.

>>60661247 (OP)
Anyone who saw the ancient whales moving a few weeks ago and didn't see that the end was near deserves to lose it all. That said, I want to tell my good friend about this but he's deep in the cult of Gaylor.

Can we put together a chart or something? start dropping articles with strong hints?

>>60661247 (OP)
> Satoshi sells all of his crypto
> Bitcoin drops 5%
ohhh noooooo

>>60661247 (OP)
>literally
Low IQ post.
Opinion discarded.

>>60661356
Thata why we have all been gang stalking you for all these years.
Now turn towards the window for me.

>>60661252
And you believe that anyone with his mindset would give the keys to anyone.

mfw Saylor already has ~half as many as Satoshi

>>60661255
lmao
the best part about your whole thread, IMO, is how you don't understand what qualifies as "centralization" in blockchains... in 2025
here's a hint: ask GPT to explain to you how do you determine it
it's funny seeing you humiliate yourself on the internet like this, but also very cringe

>>60661247 (OP)
bruh
>>60661252
double bruh

>>60661255
>holds 5% of the total supply
>centralised

pick one

>>60664006
let him try to figure it out on his own