Umm wtf? Is this true?

>>60674217 (OP)
No. Sirgay takes staker's profits and adds it to his McDonald's spending account.

>>60674217 (OP)
wtf does this xeet even mean, i can't parse the ESL
and why not do if chainlink earns $700 billion a year? or $700 trillion? why stop at $7 billion? hypotheticals with no basis in reality are the best

Why would Chainlink Labs distribute their profits to token holders when they have zero obligations to do so?

>>60674276
They've been doing it for nearly three years now.

>>60674217 (OP)
only (((a portion of))) CCIP and SVR revenue are shared with stakers. that's about tree fiddy usd per 1000 link staked

salmon is a mentally ill 40IQ bald incel pajeet

>>60674217 (OP)
Nope. Sergey would just pivot to an AI company and use all the cash to fund whatever he wants. Sergey is not some benevolent and magnanimous guy like linkies believe. This is a guy who bought his dad a fucking Lambo after pumping and dumping NXT

if stink generated a million a year in passive income why would you shill it to pump the floor instead of accumulating it

ourjeet is unfortunately both mentally and physically ill, I legitimately feel sorry for him

if he would at the very least eat eggs, not just rice and orange juice

>>60674217 (OP)
engagement bait at best.

infohazard. spreading his brain damage. Read the following at your own risk:
"an average staker from 8500 total (with ~4,809 LINK)"

>>60674354

>>60674286
No, they haven't lmao. The 4% is substantially less than the token dilution alone and then add to that the OTC payments we know they do.

>>60674440
>it's not sharing profits if it's less than token dilution
Whatever you say Thomas.

>>60674454
You'd let a nigger fuck your ass if he said sorry whilst he did it.

>>60674465
stop thinking about anal sex, Thomas

>>60674454
It's not a profit distribution though. There is no profit. Staking is paid out from the foundation's reserve.

>>60674471
So the token sales aren't profit for CLL?
You're squirming, Thomas the XRP holder.

>>60674476

An entire thread filled with the mentally ill. Sweet.

>>60674440
I'm up 200% on an asset that is also yielding me 4% annually so yeah I'm the retard

>>60674286
staking rewards are a customer retention program. you know the coupons you get in the supermarket? same thing, they entice you to buy things that aren't needed, like the token

>>60674256
>>60674354
the pajeet is trying to say "8500 wallets have staked 40,875,000 Link tokens, at an average of 4809 Link per wallet"

>>60674440
this entire statement is a massive cope for not being in the staking pool

kwab

>>60674391
oh shoot I'm totally cool with being wrong.
Cant you explain the numbers to me?
what does "from 8500 total" mean?
4,809 LINK is meaningful in isolation, but gibberish in context
Where does the final number come from and how does it relate to the previous figures?

>>60674217 (OP)
Average, not median. Once you take the grifting by the top brass out of the system the median staker makes about $3.50 a week

>>60674276
>>60674333
>>60674440
>>60674465
>>60674471
>>60674486
>>60674875

Thomas, we know you're a fidget spinner.
You have absolutely no place whining about Link token dumps when Ripple dumps many times more and literally NONE of it goes to the XRPL network or nodes because they're required to work for free.
Every single XRP dumped by Ripple is pure pocket money for them.

>>60674276
it's the node operators who get the rewards, not chainlink labs
LINK just provides the framework for the operators to offer their services and for the customers to receive all necessary information

(You) indirectly get exposure to this since node operators will eventually open their nodes (likely using the official LINK website as a middleman interface) to attract LINK holders, since the more LINK a node has the more collateral-requiring tasks it can handle and the more profit is generates
the current "staking" we have is unnecessary since no tasks require collateral yet, it's closer to something like an experiment or an alpha version to ensure people are familiar with the process for when the real thing is up

this is also why LINK has no big-time usage yet (i'm talking about running the world economy level, not defi shit), it's because the big boys will not buy LINK services if their position is not secured by collateral

>we have degenerated into 2018 level of discourse thanks to newfags