>Go All In on NVDA
>get rich as fuck
why you refuse to do the obvious thing?

>>60686102 (OP)
Because for some strange dumb reason I never take my own advice.

>>60686102 (OP)
What's the contract address?

>>60686185
Total dumbfuck shitcoiner death

>>60686191
What?

What's your price target, OP?

>>60686102 (OP)
Go all in now and maybe get a 1.5x? That’s almost as bad as buying btc.

>>60686102 (OP)
NVDA will dump as soon as a much cheaper GPU comes out of Eurasia. Too much of their value is speculative.

A lot of chaos coming to the AI chips markets over the next few years with competition (ie AMD) and shit about China wanting to retake Taiwan. Plus NVDA already mooned hardcore with peak AI hype mania so I really don't know why anyone would want to ape in now unless they know how to play the options game.

>>60686102 (OP)
>buy the macro top bro

ops just another smartass who want others to pump his old bags

>>60686277
there is also the obvious AI fraud factor. That bubble bursting will take 1/3rd out of NVDA's price, and is inevitable.

Because its maybe a 4x and I need 100x

>>60686231
Their forward P/E is slightly higher than value stocks like Coca Cola. Not even close to a high speculative multiple, especially compared to something like Tesla. NVDA would have to basically 4-5x tomorrow for it to not be the best price:value stock in the market.

>>60686394
You're a retard. most of their revenue numbers are future/speculative sales.

>>60686102 (OP)
because it needs 4 fucking trillion dollars to hit a 2x and at any time it could come crashing down

Because the chart looks exactly like the BTC chart in 2021

>>60686414
I don't even know how to respond to something as dumb as this, sorry anon. "Speculative sales".. kek, there are laws about revenue reporting in the USA, Idk what third world shithole you are coming from.

>>60686191

>>60686102 (OP)
>go all in on nvda
>and do a 1.5x within the next 6-12 months
nah, I good man.

My next GPU will be AMD after 20+ years

>>60686185
you have it with xstocks.