>7 link threads on the front page around the clock
mods: this is ok
>1 post about a new coin that could be early
mods: ban for advertising

lol
Confirmed, the binance shitcoin casino is officially less pajeet than /biz/

>>60693071 (OP)
>Jannies are Link marines

Of the 7 link threads I counted, 6 are fud threads. If the jannies are linkmarines why do they allow this obvious spam?

>>60693150
if the fud is terrible, it triggers a spite buying response. nobody is selling because of it, link marines post "did not read, never selling" and "just bought more". that's the goal, anon

>jannies got tricked into bagholding a dead asset
I mean, a smart person would never waste their time on cleaning this place up. At least not for free. So I'm not surprised at all.

>>60693156
It's because the Jannie's are inconsistent biased faggots

>>60693170
it's just the next logical step in the filter bubble. instead of having everyone agree about the thing, have really weak opponents of the thing, reinforcing the belief that the thing must be correct. it's not rocket science

>>60693182
I'd rather we had 1 occasional legit thread that literal schizophrenic copy paste bot babble, or all caps retard threads

Clean the fucking board up jannies

>>60693184
i guess they think the current system drives more token sales. you could try starting a general thread, but anons would rather enjoy the flood of embarrassing fud threads so they can argue against strawmen to reinforce their beliefs, because "this is a link board"

>>60693071 (OP)

>>60693226
Yeah i call you guys jeets but i like to see these threads, i can decide by myself if its good.

>>60693182
It's called controlled opposition. I would agree weren't it for the fact that the people posting low effort fud have no qualms staying in the thread to argue their shitty point for dozens of posts straight. That is mental illness, not some masterplan to pump LINK.

>>60693343
some could be imitators that do it for the attention

>>60693071 (OP)
I report anything new. I’ve been doing it for free for years.

I can’t let your pajeets re-gain a foothold here with your spam

>>60693399
Definitely don't doubt that. All these recurring characters are in dire need for attention, even if it's negative.

This forum is useless. I got banned for talking about SUI when it was under $1. There have been 0 talks about solid coins that could have made anons rich like hype.

It's just a constant state of masturbation around chainlink, xrp and pseudo /pol/ talks about life.

>>60693071 (OP)
Please buy Link saar

>>60693472
>we love the American banking system Saaaaars

>>60693071 (OP)
i get banned all the time for link threads. apparently it's spamming/flooding
quit whining