Weekend discussion, why wasn't Brad (CEO of XRP) here?

>>60693592
aspergers

>>60693611
probably, but one of his 500 employees should have briefed him that brown nosing in front of the cameras is not a good look

>>60693592
>>60693621
This is the lowest effort most backfiring fud I've ever seen on this board

>>60693580 (OP)
Why is there a forced competition between xrp and link on this board? One is the 3rd top crypto and the other is a erc20 token that isn't even half it's all time high.

>>60693630
yeah, anons trying to steer the conversation away from sergey embarrassing himself toward xrp was pretty painful to read. glad they realized that it was drawing even more attention to spergey so they stopped

>>60693592
Thry really hate this video. The founder of your favorite coin "meeting" the president should be such a proud moment but they never post the video and freak out whenever it gets posted. The official Chainlink X account will block you for posting it. Kek

>>60693656
>Why is there a forced competition between xrp and link on this board?
Thomas/Adem exposed himself as an XRP shill. He's probably the worst fudder in 4chan history, and everything he complained about all those years Ripple does a million times worse.

The gloves are off, Ripple is a failure and it's time lean on that shit hard.

>>60693666
Just say you regret not buying XRP when it was under $1

>>60693580 (OP)
I was expecting so much more. The riddles, the numbers, everything pointed to Brads great appearance next to the rest of the chads. Even a nerd like Sergey was granted his moment of autistic spotlight.


I guess ripple and xrp aren’t that important after all. The rumors are true. The token probably isn’t needed.

>>60693737
>The token probably isn’t needed.
No shit.

settlement with Ripple:
>asset X => XRP => asset Y

settlement with Chainlink:
>asset X => asset Y

XRP is literally an unneeded middleman "bridge token".

>>60693754
damn.

what would happen if ripple was caught funding these tiktok/twitter campaigns? something isn't right, I feel terrible.

>>60693754
>settlement with Chainlink:
I'll fix this:
>Buy ETH.
>ETH => gas fee => Link => gas fee => asset X
Then
>Asset X => gas fee => asset Y
Then
>Asset Y => gas fee => Stable coin
Then
>Stable coin => network fee => USD

Or on Ripple:
>Buy XRP
>XRP => Asset x => Asset y => RLUSD => USD

>>60694281
>>Buy ETH.
kek what?
Show us where it says that in pic

>>ETH => gas fee => Link => gas fee => asset X
what the fuck am I reading
cripples lost their marbles

>>60694206
Yup, it's shitcoin KINO.

>>60693659
ai getting good

>>60693656
There can only be one ultimate scam in the top 3. For LINK to win, XRP must fail.

>>60693592
It's just a wax sculpture

>>60694684
Oh you mean the image thats made by linkies showing what doesn't exist?
Because you do know link is forever tied to ETH, and there's no way to change that.
>But Asset x => Asset y as a settlement!
Can be done on XRPL already completely bypassing the need for SWIFT in global transactions. And ironically the token (link) isn't needed for linky imaginary systems, why would it ever hit ATH again?

>>60693737
they are needed as web3 banking is concern. Vaulta also is well needed.

>>60694875
I bought xrp and its plainly obvious link is very much needed. its you fucks who manipulated my family into buying this overrated shitcoin. i hope you get hit by a car.

>>60694875
>Can be done on XRPL
It can be done on any chain with the right external data connector.
Trouble is all those banks have their own chains, and if they do use a public chain it's never XRPL but mostly Ethereum, Solana, Avax, ...

>>60694875
>Made by linkies

https://www.visa.com.sg/content/dam/VCOM/regional/ap/singapore/global-elements/documents/interim-report-e-hkd-pilot-programme-phase-2.pdf

You mean VISA, HKMA, ANZ. yes, they are all linkies.

>>60695003
>VISA, HKMA, ANZ
Watch out my guy, Thomas the XRP shill gets extremely agitated whenever you list large institutions that are directly working with Chainlink.

>>60695013
I replied to Thomas?

Disgusting. He needs to get a trip so everyone knows when he is shitting up a thread.

>>60695035
Most likely. He's a massive ripple shill as well as responsible for 99% of all Link fud.

>>60693580 (OP)
Ripple had multiple tickets and 3 employees attending minimum, which in itself is pretty insane. Brad said he was "bummed he couldn't make it" because he had other obligations. They sent their Chief Legal Officer who also personally represented Brad in the lawsuit as an adjoined party (Stuart Alderoty). If anything, Brad being busy elsewhere in a way that surpassed the marketing/technical value of attending and seeing the others and being given multiple tickets which multiple Ripple employees use, particularly the CLO who met with Trump himself many times, is an unbelievably bullish sign of what is things happening we don't even know about.

>>60695077
An interesting theory of what this more important thing may be is presented in this thread starting with this post for anyone interested:
https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60665500#p60668374

>>60694684
Sergey has a subscription program. He keeps all the payments for himself. Even those payments that you say are majored for certain services, they don't trigger a link buy-He just pockets it.

Here is how the CCIP Ethereum to Arbitrum contract works (0x925228d7b82d883dde340a55fe8e6da56244a22c) as an example.
>Users can pay fees in either LINK or WETH.
>When a fee is paid in LINK, it's directly added to a running total of LINK fees owed to Node Operators.
>If a fee is paid in WETH it calculates how much LINK that amount of WETH is worth.
>This conversion is added to the running total of LINK fees owed to the Node Operators. **NO ACTUAL TOKEN SWAP OCCURS HERE**
>Since Node Operators are always paid in LINK - the contract keeps track of how much LINK is owed to Node Operators based on all fees paid (in LINK or WETH equivalent).
>Since users can pay in WETH and Node Operators need LINK, there needs to be a way to ensure enough LINK is available.
>A separate contract called LinkAvailableBalanceMonitor (at address 0x25204a85dBC29300ce60133cedA267aAdb73CfBD) periodically adds LINK to this contract (manually triggered by ChainLink Labs). Ensuring there's always enough LINK to pay the Node Operators, even if many users paid in WETH.
>Since WETH is never actually converted to LINK, the WETH simply accumulates over time in this contract.
>The accumulated WETH can only be withdrawn by the contract owner (ChainLink Labs).
>There's a special function (withdrawNonLinkFees) that allows ChainLink Labs to take out all the WETH.
>This WETH withdrawal can happen at any time, as long as there's enough LINK in the contract to cover what's owed to Node Operators.
So essentially, CCL gets to keep all ETH fees and Node Operators get LINK.
This is not FUD, this is simply how the contract works; they have never used the withdrawNonLinkFees function and it's unclear what they intend to do with the WETH but it needs to be clear to everyone that a WETH/LINK swap NEVER happens.

>>60695035
Why are linkcels pretending that this faggot isn’t a self fudding linknigger? Everyone remembers “I hold chainlink and I’m gay,” everyone remembers the screenshots from the discord. You faggots are insufferable, but it’s even more cringe how now you’re larping as a victim of fud and blaming it on XRP kek

>>60695112

>>60695077
>>60695100
Hello sophistry anon. I think people are more interested in why you think this exact paragraph is worth spamming?

https://warosu.org/biz/?task=search&ghost=false&search_text=is+an+unbelievably+bullish+sign+of+what+is+things+happening+we+don%27t+even+know+about.

>>60695130
Kek

>>60695130
If you're that obsessed with some retard that lives with his parents, shouldn't you step back and rethink your life? He's no whale pumping and dumping, he can't affect the markets, he makes some posts and you seethe. That's it.
Yet you guys have been going on and on about this guy for years.
Years.

>>60695183
>hey guys, if you get annoyed at a guy shitting in front of your door day in day out for years, shouldn't you take a step back to consider you are actually the one that needs to rethink your life?

Rent free

>>60695283
Ever consider /biz/ has more posters than link-obsessed faggots, and it's not just 'yours'?

>>60693580 (OP)
He wasn't invited because he wasn't involved

>>60695147
he holds link (and xrp) but likes to fud link. he admitted it once