OOOOOOHHHHH revenue fuddies!!!!!
Your response?

https://x.com/chainlink/status/1951424483572719617
>617

sergey is betraying users for using his oracle kek

TNN.

>>60726092 (OP)
Kek. So now Chainlink is doing MEV, stealing value from users, and splitting the benefit with the DEX. And none of this benefits the token holders. Incoming why is no one buying the token?? Lel

>>60726092 (OP)
HOLY COW SVR HAS PULLED IN HOW MUCH OVER THE PAST 4 MONTHS SINCE SVR HAS BEEN LIVE? 200K!! AMAZING. OF WHICH CHAINLINK PULLS IN A STAGGERING 35%.
CL LABS IS ABSOLUTLEY ROLLING IT IN AFTER THEY'VE GENERATING A WHOPPING 70 THOUSAND US DOLLARS OVER THE PAST 4 MONTHS! THAT'S $100 PER EMPLOYEE THEY HAVE ON THE PAYROLL!!
CAN YOU BELIEVE IT, MARINES!?!?

>>60726092 (OP)
Wagmi

>>60726092 (OP)
Why did they take away the APIs that let the public audit the revenues?

>>60726424
WOULD YOU REALLY WANT THE WORLD KNOW YOU GENERATING LESS THAN 1000 BUCKS A DAY WITH YOUR FLAGSHIP FEATURE?

>>60726424
YOU REALLY THINK CL LABS WANTS SOME RANDOM SCHMO TELLING THE WORLD THEY GENERATE LESS THAN 1000 BUCKS PER DAY WITH THEIR FLAGSHIP FEATURE THAT THEY HYPED UP FOR YEARS?

>>60726092 (OP)
> stupid nigger
Good for chainlink labs
Meaningless for bag holders

>>60726424
https://svr.llamarisk.com/

>>60726092 (OP)
3 words: Price. Chart. Now.

No matter what, always fud link. Any news, any post, always fud link. just like market nukes when chainlink posts on x. Do NOT accumulate, I repeat, DO NOT accumulate, just fud link.

>>60726528
THE PROJECT AND THE CL EMPLOYEES PROVIDES ENOUGH FUD THESE DAYS
BRAGGING ABOUT 200K IN LIQUIDATIONS OVER A 4-MONTH SPAN. PATHETIC!

>>60726092 (OP)
The most interesting part about this is it shows Chaos Labs tracker is correct, Llamarisk is not. Chainlink made like $70k in 1 day off this. Imagine DeFi 10x's and more protocols start using it. Easily could be an average $500k/day product.

>>60726520

>Llamarisk is not
How do you know? What's the difference?

>>60726869
>lol JIDF chart for (((chainlink))) bags

Are people still doing defi?

>>60726765
IM GOING TO GO EASY ON YOU BECAUSE YOU SOUND LIKE A YOUNG MOONBOY. SVR OCCURS IN TIMES OF HIGH VOLATILITY. IT WONT BE AN EVERY DAY THING, BUT RATHER, A HANDFUL OF TIMES A YEAR

>>60726869
Is this a Benjamin Cowen simp chart?

>>60726092 (OP)
So that's 200k dollars buying pressure for LINK, very cool but clearly that's a drop in a bucket, or we wouldn't have dumped just as hard as the rest of the shitcoins in this market.

>>60727960
>So that's 200k dollars buying pressure for LINK
no its not. its 200k to chainlink labs

>>60727961
No, SVR works buy automatically buying LINK on the open market

>>60727961
IMAGINE BEING SO CONFIDENTLY WRONG
ITS 70 GRAND TO CL LABS. 35/65 SPLIT WITH AAVE
70 GRAND REVENUE FOR A COMPANY WITH OVER 700 EMPLOYEES

i love capslock bro

genuinely a service to humanity, saving people from being sergey's exit liquidity

>>60726869
>log chart

>>60726249
This

>>60726092 (OP)
No LINK tokens were necessary for this whole thing to execute, funny that.
Picrel is literally you.

Price. Chart.

>>60728257
LOVE YOU TOO, BROTHER
I WANT ALL MY LINK BROTHERS TO MAKE IT. EVEN THE DEPLORABLE SHILLS

>>60726258
Because it launched 4 months ago at only ~3% coverage, expanding to 27% in May, and 75% a month ago

>>60726092 (OP)
This is my response.

>>60729012
>>60729641

>>60729023
posted
>>60726869

>>60729893
WHOA AN INFOGRAPHIC!!! TOTAL GAME CHANGER!! SURELY WE'RE GOING TO MOON TO THE HIGH HEAVENS NOW THAT CL LABS POSTED A HOPIUM-FILLED IMAGE!!

>>60726092 (OP)
Wasn't MEV a a big problem that Chainlink was trying to solve like 4 years ago? Why is Chainlink doing MEV now?

>>60726249
>>60730057
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-smart-value-recapture-svr/

>Today, the value associated with oracle-related MEV, such as liquidations, is captured by the searchers, builders, and validators of a blockchain network, with none returning back the DeFi protocols, end-users, and oracles that originally generated the oracle-related MEV. Recapturing this non-toxic MEV would ultimately return value back to its originator.

>From our research, we’ve successfully developed the initial version of an OEV solution called Smart Value Recapture (SVR). Chainlink SVR is built specifically for backrunning as it pertains to liquidations and cannot be used for frontrunning or sandwich attacks, which are toxic forms of MEV that harm the user experience.

>>60730068
Wow based, thanks for doing the research for my lazy ass

>>60729592
cool, staking was launched 3 years ago, where are the iterative updates? when are they going to expand the pool, when are they going to add more feeds?
ccip was launched 2 years ago, when is v1.6 coming, why is nobody using it?
I'm beginning to see a pattern here

Chainlink is the next-gen standard for tokenizing things like stocks on Ethereum

>why is nobody using it?
84% of oracles on Ethereum

>>60730953
>when is v1.6 coming
You're out of date man.
Anyway, I agree it's pretty shitty they haven't updated staking. My guess is that it's because they haven't gotten as much protocol revenue as they were expecting. That's why when SVR was released they said it'd help fund staking rewards; so now staking expansion is dependent on SVR's success.

>>60728261
>log chart is okay for bitcoin and other assets though
Retard.

>>60729893
>9 years later.
WE'RE AT THE CUSP!

7 to 10 years is usually the threshold at which you can measure the success of a startup.
I don't know how it works for charities though, because that's clearly what's running.

>>60731384
I suppose you could say that they are successful

>>60730998
Don’t you think it’s crazy how they kept all this stuff completely under the radar and then have just been launching one critical component after another? CRE & DECO, payment abstraction, ACE.. I guess they didn’t want any of the Oracle “competition” having any idea about what was happening. Now there really is no competition anymore.

>>60729012
>>60727961
Chainlink SVR is the first Chainlink service to be connected to the Payment Abstraction system. Payment Abstraction is a system of onchain smart contracts that significantly help reduce billing and payment friction for users and developers interacting with Chainlink services. The system is designed to convert fee tokens into LINK via existing Decentralized Exchange (DEX) contracts.

>>60731550
>begins
2 more beginnings

>>60726092 (OP)
>>60729592
We’re going exponential, two thirds of the total value recaptured has happened in the last 7 days

>>60731004
>Ondo not using LINK
>securitize not using LINK
>token not used to settle/store value with SWIFT
>token not used to settle/store value with DTCC
>Sergey still has 9b left to dump
>hyperliquid not using LINK (more volume than nance)
>CCIP revenue kebab shop tier
>lost interop war to LZ and W (more TVL, Volume, txs, revenue etc..)
>no build rewards, waiting on regulatory clarity (they aren't, total airdrop value $100 possibly)
>no DECO
>no staking (ETH price feed for 3 years kek)
>advocates swarming biz to change sentiment
>Sir Gay still fat
>no CCIP for SOL or BTC after 3 years
>70% down from ath
>bleeding out

>>60726092 (OP)
The value does not flow into the token.

>>60732568
This fud spam is a bit out of date.
>Ondo uses CCIP
>Hyperliquid uses CCIP
>Build rewards have begun, with LINK stakers getting $2500+ in a single drop (SXT)
>CCIP is on Solana
>Sergey IS still fat

>>60733172
Leave him be, it's funnier that way.

>>60731964
They talked about all of this stuff a year ago, and presented it to people on the "same slides".
And now it's like nothing they've seen anywhere else.

>>60732454
This is only on AAVE too. The number of defi platforms integrating SVR is going up.

>>60732640
The value flows into the token.

>>60733889
>The number of defi platforms integrating SVR is going up
Have others laucnhed? I thought it was still only AAVE

>>60733892
If this was true the token price would be going up. It is going down.

>>60726424
kek the node rewards and contracts are all on chain. Go “audit” your little heart out.

>>60733959
>value flows into token so therefore the token price must go up minute-by-minute
fallacy!