uh oh poopy

Literally a cup and handle. New ATH eow

>>60739056
this cup and handle?

>>60739054 (OP)
zoom out and show how your "death crosses" performed previously, faggot

>>60739054 (OP)
I hope you’re correct I need more time

>>60739080
best I can do anon. This assume it does the same thing just because it looks the same. Maybe Drumpf announces he's buying 1 million BTC

>>60739120
I just noticed my last arrow points to September 10th, which is crazy because I think the bottom will be in September. I didn't even do that on purpose lol

>>60739054 (OP)
Death cross?
Bullish

>>60739120
lots of fails (a fail's definition being the price being considerably higher not too long after the "death cross")

>>60739216
well we'll just see, it's all astrology anyways. But I think a retest of the 50 week SMA in September seems like a plausible outcome

>>60739279
I backtested the statistics of this strategy. It's not very profitable and the drawdown is about 80%. Disregard this concept entirely and move onto other things.

>>60739298
now you're just making stuff up

>>60739305
sorry, my bad, you would have been liquidated with even 1X inverse perpetual. regardless, i assure you, you are not just a faggot, but a massive giant faggot that needs to be fed cum drip every second of the day. godspeed.

>>60739198
>>60739056
>>60739080
>death cross
>cross
>jesus christ our lord and savior
bullish

>>60739120
You would have sold in late June. Maybe you did.
L O L
M
A
O

>>60739399
so many normies follow death crosses that usually there is a little fakeout pump when one happens

>>60739054 (OP)
Billionaires buying BTC aren't looking your fucking lines

>>60739382
That puts us around 100k btc right?
Not bad.

>>60740680
unlikely, if you use the weekly chart you will notice that the bottom was absolutely where the previous top was. this means no blowoff period yet, stable new upwards direction. odds of saylorcycle are now i would guess out my ass 25%, that is a significant probability

>>60739061
kek, wow, how did you even see that

>>60739640
>Billionaires buying BTC
you mean Saylor? kek.

>>60739279
>If there was a real halving it would upset a lots of people, chart seems reasonable though.

>>60739054 (OP)
lol good call