few.

this is bearish

>>60746909 (OP)
>Gargled circuits
What did Sergey mean by this

>>60746909 (OP)
IQlet here
Wot dis meen?

>>60746943
gay robots

It's good that it's all garbled now.

the point being? the "evaluator" is an off-chain entity and the destination chain has no knowledge of the proof

>>60746909 (OP)
This has literally nothing to do with Chainlink.

>>60747053
It's essentially an optimistic rollup for Bitcoin taking advantage of zero knowledge proofs.

>>60747053
It means you can do anything you want on Bitcoin, smart contracts, compute shit

>>60747558
>>60747461
So there's no point in any other block chains?

>>60746909 (OP)
no support for oracles

>>60747461
>>60747558
it's not immutable in the way a normal rollup is, you are dependent on the off-chain evaluator and if it goes offline you are toasted

>>60748183
>you are dependent on the off-chain evaluator and if it goes offline you are toasted
For all intents and purposes every rollup is like this, see for example Base when it went offline for 30 minutes. Sure, in the case of Base and other OP chains you can force a transaction in after waiting 12 hours, but 12 hours per transaction is pretty terrible.

>>60748211
yeah you're dependent on their sequencer, but because it's a smart contract on Ethereum, the state is all on-chain and anyone can manually withdraw back to L1