if we get just a few more terrible jobs reports, then this economy is headed to the shitter. where are the jobs gonna come from

All the good jobs will disappear to AI and humans will get multiple gig economy jobs just to survive.

This will make job numbers go up and they'll claim it's a booming economy.

4hr work days will become a thing and they will hire a 2nd person to cover the “2nd shift”

>>60750169 (OP)
The same place money comes from

burp

>>60750169 (OP)
Obama fixed this by adding part time and temp work to the jobs report

>>60750196
Correct.

Fewer jobs will be seen as bullish

then when there are more jobs you will see gigadumps kek


>market jitters as investors worry ai not fulfilling promise of further job reduction

>fed pivots hawkish as employment rises
>"we are in uncertain territory. we will sit by and watch, as we do." commented fed chair Globo

>>60750169 (OP)
>30% GDP growth
>0% job growth
This is what's coming

>>60750169 (OP)
Economy is headed into a recession but first the market has to go up like crazy.

>>60750196
>All the good jobs will disappear to AI
Is this just a meme or is AI a legitimate threat to white collar jobs?

>>60750169 (OP)
That is a very cool lizard, OP. I am going to post in this thread only because you posted the lizard and I am a big fan of very cool lizards. I just think they're such cool creatures.

Yeah I don't know man. I feel like a lot of the economy is fake and there are already too many fake email jobs that the companies would probably cut if they did any kind of scrutiny towards those jobs. But there are some real jobs opening up. I'm talking like local in-person things, like an office that uses a CRM platform and they don't know how to quite put into words what their technical needs are, so they're wanting to bring on a technical person to join their team and interface between the business and the tech, that kind of thing.

^Is the above enough to have a better job report? Probably not, as times get tougher and the economy gets leaner the businesses are going to start looking at some fat they can trim, and if they're already super bloated with people who don't do anything, the job creation growth is going to be negative rather than positive as more positions are cut rather than filled.

Less jobs but labor supply increasing more is bullish, right?

America is dying, the people in power are just picking the corpse clean before they move on.

>>60753694
It can be in terms of companies spending a lot less on labor costs and being able to be more selective in their recruitment and having a bigger talent pool to pull from. But remember that less people being employed means less consumer spending, which a lot of companies rely on.

>>60753643
It's a legitimate threat. It's not that AI can entirely replace white collars, it's that it can do 75% of what they do at 25% of the cost. Never mind that AI often fucks up and needs guidance. It's similar to the doctors vs. nurses dichotomy, where work will be offloaded onto comparatively unskilled workers rather than pay top dollar for the best.

>>60753712
Consumer spending from the bottom 90% has decreased already. And top 10% increased theirs.
And top 10% spending already makes up 50% of the spending.

>>60750169 (OP)
we should hash extra jobs from the blockchain

>>60753715
>>60753643
The jobs where LLMs are going to be relevant are things that a company ignorantly created a position for where they didn't know any better, like hiring someone to just manually go through a spreadsheet and put a $ sign on every number (which are things that surprisingly happen all the time in office jobs, so many people in the business world are just retarded when it comes to technology and have no idea what their own systems are capable of automating)

For everything else, LLMs are just tools that you can use to make your work faster if you find that you're doing a lot of tedious repetitive shit. LLM technology is not capable of thinking or reasoning in the way that you are probably imagining (LLMs don't KNOW anthing, they just perform some statistical math based on your input to produce an output), so I mean if you have any kind of real job where actual decision making and independent thought is required, and you're good at your job and you bring a lot of value that people are willing to pay for, then I don't know what you're so afraid of. I almost wonder if people who spread this kind of fear mongering have even tried to automate their own jobs with this tech that they're so afraid of.

It's a next-token-predictor. A more sophisticated version of your phone's text autocomplete. If you can be replaced by that, then your job probably falls into the category of "things that a company ignorantly created a position for where they didn't know any better, like hiring someone to just manually go through a spreadsheet and put a $ sign on every number"