>first they ignore you
>then they laugh at you
>then they fight you
>and then you win
Xrp chads final hurdle before it's mai tais on the beach.

>Banker vaporware token
>10 year long grift
>Token not needed
Ay dios mio goyim

>>60750467 (OP)
If they become their own bank the $100 target might be realistic. Someone dump some "insider" info please. If a democrat starts adding a shit ton of XRP to their publicly disclosed portfolio let us know.

>>60750467 (OP)
JP Morgan was sued about 5 years back and it was revealed that they own critical parts of the ethereum consensus.

But you have retards on here that like to shit on XRP for no reason other than manipulated market sentiment.

>>60750475
>>Token not needed
This fud only works for link. XRP is burned for minting, moving and converting XRP & RLUSD. Everything on the network requires XRP to function.

>>60750480
what are node operators paid in then? USD? dipping dots?

Why do you think that the SEC sued Ripple in the first place? Makes you think...

>>60750480
Why would any bank use XRP tokens instead of a Stablecoin?

>>60750467 (OP)
Guysguysguys banks!

>>60750482
>>60750486
>What is RLUSD
Try keeping up.

>>60750492
what are the node operators paid with directly? Because it for sure as hell isn't RLUSD

>>60750467 (OP)
Based on the provided images, here are a few conspiracy theories or plausible explanations that could correlate the involvement of major U.S. banks opposing Ripple's banking license, the political influences on SEC chief Gary Gensler's stance, and JPMorgan's stakes in Ethereum:

>Banking Cartel Protecting Market Dominance: A conspiracy theory could suggest that the 42 banks, including JPMorgan, Citi, and others, are part of a coordinated cartel aiming to suppress Ripple's growth to protect their own blockchain investments, such as JPMorgan's stake in Ethereum. Their objections to Ripple's license, backed by political pressure on figures like Gensler, might be a deliberate strategy to maintain control over the financial and crypto markets.

>Political Puppetry for Financial Interests: A plausible explanation could be that Gensler's public anti-crypto stance was influenced by political pressures from these banks, who leveraged their lobbying power and Senate connections to shape regulatory decisions. This could align with JPMorgan's Ethereum involvement, suggesting a hidden agenda where banks push for regulations that favor their own blockchain projects while hindering competitors like Ripple.

>Insider Trading and Regulatory Manipulation: Another theory might propose that banks with Ethereum stakes, like JPMorgan, are using their influence over regulatory bodies (via political allies) to manipulate the market. Gensler's private leniency toward crypto could indicate he was aware of these stakes, and the banks' objections to Ripple's license might be a move to eliminate competition while they profit from their Ethereum investments.
These ideas combine the banks' actions, political influences, and financial interests into a narrative of strategic control over the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

>>60750492
>$42M 24 hour volume
Shiggy diggy, USDC and USDT already exist

>>60750467 (OP)
>david schwartz is like dude guy please let me legally rehypothecate my depositors assets over 140%
And chad jp morgan is like
>no

before I leave I would just like to add is this.

If Ripple was TRULY a ghost chain with vaporware products and services, why are these billion dollar banking giants actively filing objections against them?

Why would these foundational services worry about something so insignificant and meaningless as another chain out of literal millions?

>>60750467 (OP)
>xrp heads thought they could scam all these banks and pretend they're partners by paying their way into events and giving them free batches of their shitcoin that only literal retards buy
>xrp applies for stuff and then those banks turn around and say "nah"
b-but cripplesisters i thought we were meant to be replacing swi-
oh we'll be helping sw-
oh uh we'll be used by the banks in some instan-
oh well now we're going to be a successful stablecoi-
w-well maybe we can apply to be a ba-

lmfao

>>60750522
This
Why fud if its of no use
Why sue if its no threat?
Why compare if there is nothing?
By fudding they acknowledge.
They are scared af.

>>60750522
Ripple and the XRPL are completely different things. Nobody is stopping Ripple from onboarding banks onto the XRPL, they're stopping Ripple from becoming a bank. That's completely different. You're implying that stopping Ripple from becoming a bank somehow stops adoption of the XRPL which makes no sense. Ripple becoming a bank doesn't even benefit the XRPL, they can't use it to transact with other banks unless the other bank is also connected to it. Funnily enough if Ripple actually becomes a bank they will be performing more transactions via SWIFT than with their own product.

>>60750480
>XRP is burned for minting, moving and converting XRP & RLUSD
Burns are entirely optional, nodes decide to burn or not burn.
Actual consensus on the XRPL is always free, nodes are never paid.
CBDCs on XRPL for instance use their own nodes, and they decided not to burn any XRP.
And since they don't need XRP for consensus, XRP isn't involved at all.

XRP is likewise entirely optional for most Ripple products: Interledger protocol, Ripple Payments, Ripplenet, etc.

>>Token not needed
>This fud only works for link
Every single thing Chainlink does requires nodes to be paid in Link. Zero exceptions.

If that's the case, why is XRP ranked #3 while Chainlink keeps dropping lower?
Why is it that the last time Chainlink was at this market cap, its price was nearly double what it is now?
If the cube is supposedly in such high demand, why is the price action so poor?
Does this mean the services provided by Chainlink aren't actually needed?

>>60750478
Infura != Ethereum's consensus you retard, you can run your own node

>>60750651
U don't get it Saar, 336hrs and SWITCH!

>>60750921
>why is XRP ranked #3
Nobody really knows, least of all Ripple itself.

>>60750936
Stop arguing with the indians here, it could be toxic long term and could ruin your mental health! Tumor weeks!

>investing in corporate loyalty points

>>60750476
It's a dog and pony show and all these banks own several billion xrp.

>>60750784
Nobody pays for anything in Link. Its just as useless token not needed as XRP. Youre basically just 2 camps of retards fighting with each other.

>>60751349
One camp has a nice fire and steaks cooking and the other has some old cheeseburgers they dug out of the dumpster.

I don't understand why all of you tards are pushing XRP so much. At the market cap it's at right now I don't see it ever even doing a 3x. The most you could possible hope for is probably a 2x, which in crypto terms is absolutely pathetic. It's a ship that has already sailed.

>>60750467 (OP)
Based and true.

This is crazy guys i'm so bullish I literally fell off my chair what is even happening at this point Ripple is becoming a bank? No way guys this is crazy

>>60751349
>Nobody pays for anything in Link.
Link nodes are always paid in Link for literally everything.

XRP nodes are never paid in anything.

>>60753034
They will be soon, David Schwartz (Satoshi) is working on it as we speak

>>60750486
You need to use XRP to use stablecoins on the XRPL you dumbass. XRPL is superior to all your shitchains.
XRP is a volume token, even if you fags refuse to hold it and believe nobody wants to hold it, they WANT to use the XRPL and the books will be filled with trillions of dollars buying in selling, all going through XRP.

>>60750921
>Why is it that the last time Chainlink was at this market cap, its price was nearly double what it is now?
This is not the gotcha you think it is, friend.
It's because 2/3 of the supply of chainlink is now in circulation, with the final third designed for node op and ecosystem growth incentives. This means that when Chainlink hits around $34 it would be the mcap equivalent to the $52 ATH. How much XRP has Ripple relinquished control of? Oh..

>>60750467 (OP)
Thanks just sold.

>>60750467 (OP)
They did the same thing when SoFi and other neo bank came on the scene. Its a nothing burger. They're throwing a hissy fit because they'll actually have to compete and being competitive eats into their margin.

>>60750475
>10 years
>fast
Kys you dumbass nigger. Either way, eternally stay poor.

>>60750467 (OP)
Ripple doesn't need a license for me to put all my money into XRP

>>60750467 (OP)

>>60756157
>Ripple applies for banking license
>42 banks want to stop Ripple
>President Trump stops the banks from discriminating Ripple

It is happening and there is no way you can stop it from happening.

>>60750467 (OP)

>>60756169

I'd rather things would just move along than have twitter influcancers coping with a 'steel through fire' narrative. No resistance and shit just mooning straightforwardly is preferable to having to go up against the banking cartel