Hi guys sorry if this has already been answered but after reading the Chainlink reserve blog post I'm still left wondering: What % of offchain revenue will go to PAYMENT ABSTRACTION? Is it ALL OF IT? Please note I'm not asking about what % will go towards the reserve, that's and entirely different question. I'm basically wondering if (starting now) the millions of revenue that CLL is getting will all be auto converted into LINK via Payment abstraction (independently of whether then that goes into the reserve or into paying nodes etc).

>>60759099 (OP)
It seems like the answer is eventually everything but not right now.

This guy works for Chainlink and he says all of it.

They haven’t specified this, which is typical of Chainlink because it’s the most vital piece of information to make all of this make sense. How convenient of them to leave this out…

>>60759109
Well that simply doesn't make any sense because he seems to be saying that not only will all future offchain revenue go into PA but also historic revenue. Big doubt.

>>60759138
Yeah, I doubt that as well especially since it wasn’t mentioned anywhere in the blog

>>60759147
He's doing advanced fud/lying by pretending his response to the article is "doesn't make sense", in order to manipulate people who read his post but not the image, the strat counts on the assumption "most people aren't going to read the post if it's too long". That's not an unreasonable assumption imo so this is a dangerous liar we have here

>>60759187
Leaving whatever drama you have with fishy aside, have you got any info regarding what % of offchain rev will go into PA? I mean bro if it's hundreds of millions or even billions with tradfi adoption it's massive news.

>>60759109
Fishy doesn’t work for CLL but this guy does

>>60759350
Ok but that in that tweet he says "mix of both supporting" and that's still not clear at all. What does supporting mean? A 1%? 100%? Like look at the OP image they made it look like all offchain rev will go into PA from now on but that's not possible right?

>>60759376
>offchain rev will go into PA from now on but that's not possible right?
Why wouldn't it be possible for the omni-bridge between fiat and crypto to put fiat payments into a crypto reserve.

>>60759376
No %s but at least it’s confirmed that historic revenue is going to be included and not just future

>>60759395
Ok thanks I guess we just don't know yet.
>>60759393
Because CLL needs fiat and probably the token dumping is not enough to pay for all its expenses and so they still need some portion of the hundreds of millions in offchain rev that their making, that's why I think it's not likely that *all* their offchain rev can go into PA (whether it goes into the reserve or not).

The value flows from token buyers to sergey
/thread