>>60759127 It would be rather hilarious if big banks first had LINK ETFs before XRP ETFs, but it's also the only thing that actually makes sense given XRP is a scam.
>>60759122 (OP) Extremely bullish, unironically. They wouldn't be talking about it if they were, just like they did with the ETH and DOGE ETFs. Remember how they said the same thing back then?
AnonymousID: 9w1fgwTy
8/8/2025, 9:04:38 PM No.60759161
>>60759122 (OP) It says OR not AND. Meaning there's still a possibility for XRP ETF still. Logic 101.
>>60759122 (OP) Solana didnt work out as a new technology and its still controlled by a single company. XRP has no use case or functionality. Its not even crypto. Not better than digital gold in WOW.