>>60760142Why are you promoting fraud?
We knew then LINK tokens are to launch Contrary to initial and shillers want you to believe, LINK tokens are not required to run a node and the effect they have on reputation is minimal. In fact other than providing LINK tokens for data and running scripts nodes gain nothing from owning LINK tokens.
Contrary to what LINK shills tell you, Chainlink has only really raised about 100 nodes enforced among the price for usage don’t matter.
This is very different from Bitcoin and other coins with a proof of work system that makes running a node expensive. LINK tokens do not encourage decentralisation in any way because it is so dirt cheap to run a node. LINK tokens are very close to a utilitarian shit coin. The only way to see a dollar rise from them is by convincing short-sighted people that they have value due to a utilitarian model and then offload them to demand for them because they serve no purpose in the long run. Smart contracts are years away from adoption and price distortions of LINK are the most corrupt compared because very few of the whales even own it.
---
Do you want me to also organize these by chronological order so the conversation flows exactly as it did in the threads? That would make it easier to follow the whole story.