>>60763323 (OP)>who would you hire?If it's office work, a lot of that can be automated away. I'll have one or two wagies that get along to handle the stuff the computers can't, because invoices are weird and the average adult's handwriting is somehow worse than a child's efforts these days.
If it's a position that's an absolute shitshow and is difficult to make a robot do, it will be a human job.
>>60763332>feels like there's a third option missing hereNot actually a real option, that's for people who aren't smart enough to automate slave work.