For me it’s beanmouth, hands down.

>>148981455 (OP)
replace patrick with looney cartoons bugs or day the earth blew up daffy

Hi John K

We need more diverse styles in western animation.

>>148981455 (OP)
patrick star show is garbage

>>148981488
Shut up tranny

>>148981488
Nah, John K hates Disney, so he'd never cite Mickey Mouse as an example to imitate.

>>148981455 (OP)
those adult cartoons don't look like each other at all

>>148981455 (OP)
Nice try. Smiling Friends is adult animated sitcom slot.

>>148981455 (OP)
You're retarded

>>148981455 (OP)
OP's a faggot but I genuinely find it weird as fuck that Disney has an official series called "The Chibiverse".

>>148981455 (OP)
the faux animes don't look like each other either. is this a falseflag? this feels like a false flag.

>>148981567
I mean, Disney inspired Tezuka.

>>148981542
1. Yes they do
2. They are animated using the same methods like extremely limited expressions and artless movement regardless

>>148981605
1. prove it, break down the shapes.
2. different topic

>>148981455 (OP)
hey wackyfag, you bringing anything new to the discussion today? posting any art?

>>148981740
Now you’re asking me to do a ton of work when anybody honest can see it automatically, including you.


Nobody ever says “I love this new animated sitcom’s style!” It’s made and often watched by people who think animation doesn’t matter.
>>148981779
Funny since industry defenders never post theirs. Guess you gotta go to their website to see their portfolio.

>>148981455 (OP)
this is 100 percent a falseflag, calling calarts bean mouth is the sign. the calarts style is a observable virus among cartoons back then (maybe now too, idk i don't watch them anymore) and boiling it down to the mouth shape was the strawman that insecure artists have been attacking ever since it was called out. now in a further attempt to illegitimatize the criticism it's being pasted next to more bullshit claims about other shows being artclones, without being able to prove how, making it so that it gets associated with retarded and blatantly wrong claims and giving naysayers more fule to try and collectively dismiss.

>>148981455 (OP)
Jentry Chau and Turning Red came from Asian creators, though. That is less being anime, and more imitating Asian cartoon art in general, like how Avatar: The Last Airbender was made by an Asian artist who co-created it with a white dude.

>>148981800
of course you're not going to break down the shapes, you're spouting bullshit. calarts style could be broken down to its shapes, why can't adult cartoon style?

>>148981473
>>148981506
The Patrick Star Show is wacky and expressive as shit, it looks amazing for a modern cartoon. It’s what all modern cartoons should be, giving freedom to artists so they can have fun on their jobs by drawing all these fun expressions and poses, do you seriously think the people that animate shit like StuGo and Mr. Birchum have fun animating them? No, cause their characters are stiff as fuck and unexpressive.

Let’s not forget that The Patrick Show has made fun of stuff like the beanmouth style and cartoon reviewers, it’s openly rebelling against the current state of the animation industry.

Like modern SpongeBob in general should be appreciated for it’s animation, but no, cause it’s clear you /co/tards want all shows to look like bean mouth slop animated by industry spaces who can’t have any fun on their jobs, BEAN MOUTH FOREVER

Smiling Friends and the Paul Rudish Mickey are also good examples of expressive shows that give freedom to their artists, bean mouth and those shitty Fox sitcoms don’t.

>>148981455 (OP)

You could have filled a job solicitation but you wasted your time doing this image

>>148981542
Yep, they totally look unique and distinctive alright…

>>148981573
This thread was likely made by the same anon who recently wanted to know who the next John K would be. He seems to be obsessed with “wacky”.

>>148981455 (OP)
Why is Turning Red "faux anime" and not beanmouth?

>>148981934
Its kinda an unholy combination of both desu

>>148981542
With adult cartoons, it's more about the (lack of) motion when they're actually animated. The stiffness does allow for more detail and different art directions, but they still end up sterile due to the limited movement.

>>148981455 (OP)
>Smiling Friends
>Wacky, expressive, cartoonist driven
Is this bait?

>>148981993
Smiling Friends has plenty of expressive animation, though it’s towards more being Newgrounds-like rather than "wacky". I mean it does look better than all those shitty adult animated sitcoms these days.

>>148981455 (OP)
It's all garbage

>>148981820
Buddy literal redditors have already done that, everybody understands what the style is. Just use Google.

You’re being argumentative for the sake of careers on those shows.

>>148982039
I don’t understand how anyone could defend that shitty artstyle "break down the shapes" my ass.

The only people who like that shit are either middle aged Stephen Colbert fans who beat their wives or autistic gooners who jerk off to the moms from them.

>>148982039
it's funny because the crossed out example is ALSO dogshit, just in a different way.

>>148981823
>it's le wacky so it's le good
Are you 2?

>>148982144
My point is that the show looks amazing for a modern cartoon with how expressive and well-animated it is. Look at any bean mouth show and tell me that’s looks more appealing than SB, this one gif has more soul in it than the entirety of a StuGo episode.

>>148981823
Is this a new /co/ schizo? I've already seen this post and wording

>>148981868
yes, zoom in and select similar angles of characters making similar faces, don't dare show the whole scene. even in your nitpick you can see the a clear difference between the two, despite both going for an exaggerated realistic setting. one is more minimalistic with how it builds it's characters and seems to not care at all about how it's background characters are designed, their aproach to coloring is also minimal, keeping everything flat. the other has it's character's body built with more shapes, that includes the face too and also seems to design it's background characters in a similar way with similar time put into them, also has a more dynamic approach to how it's colored as well as a different tone all together. you are a spouting bullshit.
>>148982039
there isn't a single show in the op that looks like the example provided on the right. and those notes are mostly about scene direction than art. eyes are round, dumbass, if a show is gounf to be realistic and grounded, there aren't that many more forms that eyes can take besides variations of round. i'm being argumentative because i don't let myself be lied to by faggots and if i can prevent people from falling for a bandwagon, why not.
>>148981982
that's a different conversation, OP brought up art style so i'm pointing out why he's wrong and dumb in regards to that. i suspect it's the same guy always saying this stuff too cause it always starts off with the art, then he tries to shift the topic to animation.

>>148982252
>There isn’t a single show in the op that looks like the design on the right

Are you fucking retarded? Rick & Morty is up there, all adult cartoons have to look like Family Guy/Rick & Morty clones these days. Funny how you defend adult animated sitcom slop but you haven’t said a word about the beanmouth shows looking the same. You clearly watch Fox cartoons and get butthurt when someone insults them.

>>148982324
>critiques anon for only focusing on one aspect of the OP, while only focusing on one of anon's points
like pottery

>>148982118
It’s Reddit art but at least he came up with it.
>>148982252
Lmao you are obviously an industry person. The mere fact that you can’t admit your bias shows your desperation - you are committing guerrilla warfare upon random people in the animation community simply because they correctly view your style of show as unwatchable garbage.

Answering your disingenuous demand for free work for your career at all was wrong as you react by viewing the image I posted as my Gospel to spiritually violate my soul so I’ll be fucked up enough to consume the garbage you inflict on society.
> and if i can prevent people from falling for a bandwagon,
“I’m shilling” is shorter.

>>148982372
>demands people to respond to every line of your wall of text
That way they’ll start being invested in your ugly perspective right! Pathetic manipulation

>>148982372
All the shit you said was retard, also find it funny how you said: >don’t dare share the whole scene

Retard, those images aren’t from scenes, they’re from promotional material.

We gotta keep in mind that this artstyle is universally despised among animators, bean mouth and faux anime have their fans, when this artstyle is seen as the lowest of the low. Working on one of these shows is like the animators equivalent to working at McDonalds, they don’t do it cause they enjoy it, they do it to make a living.

>>148982417
>implying that if he read, comprehended, and formulated a response to anon's opinion, his thoughts on the matter might change

>>148982324
yep, you're totally the same guy from a few days ago. you still can't break down the shapes and you still can't stay on topic. take your adhd meds before trying to argue with anyone, i'm done tard wrangling you.

just a friendly reminder, the shapes define the artsyle, the only 2 shows that use the same shapes in that same image you used last time are bobs burgers and whatever the one under it is. the rest don't look like each other. and as a bonus, rick and morty does not look like that go animate imitation that suppisedly broke down the shapes, shapes that match no show you ever posted.

>>148982409
that's a whole lot of nothing you just said.

>>148982469
Now you’re gooning to having the “power” to decide whose perspective matters in animation.

It’s such a shame nobody respects your style of the profession and cares who you platform, outside of mentally ill social media weirdos

> the rest don't look like each other.

Your eyes are broken by executive mandates and other nonsense that defines industry slop. They don’t matter.

>>148981455 (OP)
i want to watch more shows like megas xlr, i want more stuff in this art style too

>>148982469
Look it up, your precious bland adult animation artstyle is universally despised among people online for a reason. Stop trying to defend this slop

>>148981893
just checked desuarchive
based on his posts he's the same guy, he also really likes the patrick star show
>>148981779
wackyfag, not bad let's go with that

>>148982469
>>148982513
What this guy has is a mental illness of people in the animation industry who work on On-Model cartoons. Their bosses will scream at them for making a cartoon scene look a little different, so they delude themselves every adult cartoon has a meaningfully different style.

In reality they work in industrialized art which values only uniform product, not meaningful creativity, so they can get thrown on Fox for a season or 2 and disappear into streaming services.

>>148982527
be careful what you wish for, downtown/daria ripoffs are already popping up on the indie side en masse, and mega's not too far off from that look.

>>148982602
So?

>>148982674
i'm sorry to report that the ripoffs aren't bringing anything new to the table. it's all zoomie rehashes and sad nostalgia grabs. if we get to xlr rehashes they're gonna be super fucking lame

Which show is the epitome of beanmouth again?

>>148982719
Cope

>>148981455 (OP)
>cartoonists driven shows
AAAHAHAHHA HE SAID IT!
THERE IT IS!
And the reason you can't have this anymore is because the kind of personality that excels in this role cannot survive in corporate america. They will get excluded for being personally offensive to the special people within corporations who cannot be excluded by fiat.

>>148981455 (OP)
Only the middle one is an actual issue

>>148985042
Nah, the beanmouth style has infected television animation, indie animation, advertising, and even fuckin Pixar. The adult sitcom style at least has the decency to only destroy one medium.

>>148983202
Arrest