Thread 148988251 - /co/ [Archived: 1071 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/13/2025, 2:44:03 AM No.148988251
ar2v4mcdoys81
ar2v4mcdoys81
md5: 8a2e3b470acd091ba920384507b4b86c🔍
Were the 2000s the PEAK decade for animation?
Replies: >>148988258 >>148989283 >>148990473 >>148991459 >>148991831 >>148991865
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 2:44:55 AM No.148988258
>>148988251 (OP)
Maybe
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 2:45:44 AM No.148988264
They were the SHIT decade for animation if your image is anything to go by.
Replies: >>148988361
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 2:46:04 AM No.148988270
Sure.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 2:55:18 AM No.148988361
>>148988264
Kys mongrel
Replies: >>148988414
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 2:59:21 AM No.148988414
>>148988361
New AdventureTranny thread, then? The other one is autosaging.
Replies: >>148988500
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 3:06:35 AM No.148988500
IMG_0258
IMG_0258
md5: c363ad8b39435b5998b93d02c7bc0f8c🔍
>>148988414
Do you unironically get offended if insult industrycuck
Replies: >>148988516
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 3:08:01 AM No.148988516
>>148988500
English, please.

Anyway, I'll get the party started: Adult women with boobs are more attractive than little kids.
Replies: >>148988551
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 3:10:40 AM No.148988551
IMG_0273
IMG_0273
md5: 8bc1e1b32282c69342c3f6fd4d37a364🔍
>>148988516
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 4:27:28 AM No.148989283
>>148988251 (OP)
Where is Invader Zim?
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 6:58:50 AM No.148990473
>>148988251 (OP)
If you say so
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 10:19:36 AM No.148991459
>>148988251 (OP)
Yes
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 11:29:13 AM No.148991831
>>148988251 (OP)
No!!
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 11:39:17 AM No.148991865
F10VJduXoBkugPt
F10VJduXoBkugPt
md5: b616075977a799017e556a50f411912a🔍
>>148988251 (OP)
The first half of the 00s was alright but the other half was pure cancer. Cartoons adopted the cheap flash/toonboom look and never recovered. Even Johnny Test went from having beautiful hand drawn frames to ugly digital puppets in the same decade.