Thread 149041117 - /co/ [Archived: 981 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/17/2025, 6:23:38 AM No.149041117
1748221734592 (1)
1748221734592 (1)
md5: a644c2ecc01f56390b2c668cd7e0f692๐Ÿ”
The epitome of bad filmmaking.
Replies: >>149041369 >>149041728 >>149041946 >>149042370 >>149043741 >>149043991
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 7:01:08 AM No.149041369
>>149041117 (OP)
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 7:44:30 AM No.149041637
This is the third PDI movie made after Antz and prior Shrek, followed the next year by Madagascar. This is clearly the most weaker film from the bunch.
Replies: >>149041920
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 8:03:30 AM No.149041728
>>149041117 (OP)
OP has bad eyesight and meant to post Shrek 3 I assume
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 8:42:06 AM No.149041920
>>149041637
>The most weaker
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 8:45:46 AM No.149041946
>>149041117 (OP)
Wrong, that would be the Third.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 9:04:24 AM No.149042055
Dragon's massive red ass
Replies: >>149042064
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 9:06:10 AM No.149042064
Screenshot_20250617_014932_Chrome
Screenshot_20250617_014932_Chrome
md5: 2e62570e56a6806e4e4f92928a4a0e2a๐Ÿ”
>>149042055

...
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 10:41:35 AM No.149042370
>>149041117 (OP)
We should just start using these threads to talk about Shrek 2. I personally think the middle of the movie is a weaker point, doesn't have too many memorable moments but the beginning and ending are some of the best in the series.
Replies: >>149042524
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 11:41:55 AM No.149042524
>>149042370
This
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 1:25:17 PM No.149042823
>Two threads bitching about Shrek up now.

Is sharktalefag back?
Replies: >>149043134
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 2:58:35 PM No.149043127
>More emphasis on pop culture references, celebrities, licensed songs and covers
>Toilet jokes are nastier
>Comedy is more juvenile, cheap and relentless
>Disney jabs are more aggressive, including a 1 min long parody of their musical numbers and having Ariel killed
>New additions like brand parodies, tranny jokes, anachronisms, a celebrity cameo by Joan Rivers, and a racial stereotype (Puss in Boots)
>Real life people are now mentioned (Shirley Bassey, Bob Barker)
>Shrek, Donkey and Fiona aren't likeable or sympathetic anymore
>Gender norms have regressed
>Not as heartfelt or sincere
>Story is a convoluted romcom mess full of plot holes and contrivances
>Fiona is a prop and spends the entire movie in her parents' castle doing nothing
>Dragon doesn't appear until the very end
>Villains are more obnoxious than funny
>Dance party ending is cringeworthy
What went so wrong with this sequel?
Replies: >>149043811 >>149045170
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:01:16 PM No.149043134
>>149042823
He goes dead silent when you accuse him of actually liking Shrek 4 for its woke plot
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 4:54:27 PM No.149043741
>>149041117 (OP)
weak bait
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 5:03:35 PM No.149043811
>>149043127
Much agree. Also it's definitely a script penned on the heels of 9/11. It oozes negative energy. No Dreamworks film before was this abrasive.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 5:26:12 PM No.149043991
sinbad-disneyscreencaps.com-266~2
sinbad-disneyscreencaps.com-266~2
md5: 45c58c9c205f9b07d8825cc28f28bb1f๐Ÿ”
>>149041117 (OP)
Objectively better than the previous DreamWorks movie (the one with douchebag Sinbad the Sailor voiced by Brad Pitt)
Replies: >>149044167
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 5:47:05 PM No.149044167
>>149043991
Sinbad is a quite better movie than Shrek 2. Also better than the previous 2D animated film from the Glendale division, Spirit.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 7:44:53 PM No.149045170
>>149043127
Does anyone really believeโ€ Zorro, but a catโ€ counts as a racial stereotype?