>>149075476You're right. It looked like she maybe just had a thin string waistband but there's nothing there. You could almost make the argument it was artistic license until you realize she doesn't have any kind of naval ornament and that's supposed to be shadow, which then makes you realize the breasts don't make sense for that to be a bra which means it must also be shadow.
Rather poorly done. I suppose they wanted to imply lingerie while still being able to claim it wasn't for the rating/not getting cancelled but when you really examine it you realize it doesn't make sense. It should either not be see-through at all, have the detailing on the lingerie, or just show her nude underneath.
>>149075529Because it's based.
>>149075882>>149076132Agreed