← Home ← Back to /co/

Thread 149081936

20 posts 10 images /co/
Anonymous No.149081936 [Report] >>149082029 >>149082033 >>149083129 >>149083563
At a certain point, should we just admit that Pixar is an empty name? Can they do anything to save themselves? Not just financially, but in terms of their artistic integrity?
Anonymous No.149081989 [Report] >>149082042 >>149083115
Who's "we"? Make your own opinion.

I like a lot of the modern Pixar movies, myself. Haven't seen Elio and Lightyear sucked.
Anonymous No.149082029 [Report]
>>149081936 (OP)
"We" have been aggressively "admitting" it for over 15 years by now so out of simple exhaustion-induced self awareness yeah we should simply let go already.
Anonymous No.149082033 [Report] >>149082139
>>149081936 (OP)
The Grubhub one in the middle is unironically, the most pleasing one. Grubhub has better character designs and tries new things instead of beanmouth.

I don't know. Maybe get away from making animated movies about human characters. Pixar just doesn't know how to do them well anymore. Most of Pixar's better stuff like Elemental, Monsters Inc, Inside Out, and Toy Story weren't about humans and didn't have the beanmouth look. The technological limitations of older animation limited the use of human characters.
Anonymous No.149082042 [Report] >>149083142
>>149081989
You like them cause you're a faggot or a pedo
Anonymous No.149082139 [Report]
>>149082033
I need the sneed version.
Anonymous No.149082627 [Report]
Anonymous No.149083115 [Report]
>>149081989
>Haven't seen Elio
no one has, that's the problem
Anonymous No.149083129 [Report]
>>149081936 (OP)
At least panda movie was shit but fun. Other is no fun shit
Anonymous No.149083142 [Report] >>149083513
>>149082042
Kys
Anonymous No.149083203 [Report]
arr rook same
Anonymous No.149083230 [Report] >>149083521
so why did pixar go to shit? did all the talent fuck off to directly work with disney?
legit all these pixar movies from the past few years look worse than meet the robinsons
Anonymous No.149083513 [Report] >>149083617
>>149083142
>didn't deny it
Anonymous No.149083521 [Report]
>>149083230
>did all the talent fuck off to directly work with disney?
The talent got fired because they were "groomers"
>see: creative straight white males
Anonymous No.149083563 [Report] >>149083584 >>149083608 >>149084920
>>149081936 (OP)
What's the difference between Pixar beanface and Disney Frozenface? I dont hear nearly as much bitching about the latter.
Anonymous No.149083584 [Report] >>149083614
>>149083563
Frozen face at least looks pretty
Anonymous No.149083608 [Report]
>>149083563
Disney hasn't been good since they stopped doing real animation. There was a time a very long time ago when Pixar was good.
Anonymous No.149083614 [Report]
>>149083584
I disagree, I hate the stupid bug eyed look, like a Bratz doll or some shit
Look how they massacred the old disney princesses in Wreck it Ralph 2 with that crap
Anonymous No.149083617 [Report]
>>149083513
kek
Anonymous No.149084920 [Report]
>>149083563
They're both the same in terms of their negative effects on their respective companies. Imo, the Pixar beanface is way uglier, but Tangledface (really, let's be honest) has been regurgitated to the point of absurdity over the past fifteen years.
The only difference is that it's not nearly as ugly as Pixar's samefaces, therefore it doesn't get nearly as much flack as immediately. There will probably be a day though when Tangledface gets mocked mercilessly, but it won't be for a long time.