Modern cartoon hatetards be like…

never seen this criticism. more often i see that the switch to digital made animation stiff and sterile. does this random furry who csnt be assed to draw his own character fully jave a come back for that?

>>149116166
You’ve never seen the Gumball hatedom and it shows.

>>149116202
ok. anyways. so there's no come back to a real criticism?

>"modern" cartoons thread
>It's actually complaining about cartoons from 2012

>>149116256
The only relevant kids cartoons today were all made over 10 years ago

The problem with modern technology jokes is that they literally have not changed since the smartphone became mainstream.
A character simply taking a selfie is seen as a joke. Simply referencing something modern without an actual punchline.

>>149116166
>never seen this criticism

You need to lurk moar

https://desuarchive.org/co/search/text/pop%20culture%20reference/

https://desuarchive.org/co/search/text/looks%20dated/

https://desuarchive.org/co/search/text/get%20ipad/

https://desuarchive.org/co/search/text/meme%20face/

>>149116107 (OP)
I think the only criticism I have about modern tech in cartoons/whatever is that it all looks so boring from a visual/silhouette standpoint. Older tech is clunkier, had to interacted with differently, and (again) provided more interesting silhouettes when characters carried them around.

Nowadays, if a character pulls out their phone, it's just a square. And when the use their phone record something, they're just holding out a square. And when they talk to someone on their phone, they're holding a square to their head. And when they're showing someone else a thing on their phone, they're just dragging their thumb across a square.
In comparison it's a lot more interesting to see a character flip open a cell phone, mash buttons on a house phone, screw around with a rotary, lug around boomboxes or giant camcorders (bonus points for microphone extension), pull out/insert a disc, screw around with a vhs player that churns audible noise, etc. With modern tech, it doesn't feel like there's as much opportunity for small bits of character expression thorough the way said characters interact with strange, yet mundane objects.

>>149116107 (OP)
90's cartoon
>Sand dune, orange sky, scorching white sun, ox skull
>Two characters emerge from behind the dune, tongue out, exausted, trying not to trip over
>Character 1 open his Flask, trying to drink
>Close shot, a single drop drip from the flask, it evaporates before touching ground

2020 cartoon
>Two Calarturas seen from profile walking in front of a yellow triangles background
>Calartura 1 "I can't believe we're Lost in this FRICKIN DESERT and we have NO WATER LEFT"

>>149116907
That's because zoomers don't develop their observation skills.
A smartphone has many inconveniences that can be used for comedy or for plot purposes:
>Wet hand's can't interact
>Screen full of creaks
>Forgetting to turn off the alarm
>Scam Valls
>Sending pictures by mistake
>Watch something embarassing, turn off the screen, forget about It then realize too late when you want to show something to a friend on your phone
>Forget to turn on bluetooth when you're using airpods, now the whole bus can enjoy your anime OST
>Low battery
>Can't see shit in sunlight
>10 chargers in the room but none compatible with your phone
>Memory full, don't know what to delete
>Takes décades to turn on
And so on

>>149116107 (OP)
I don't recall '90s cartoons being nearly that blatantly referential, except perhaps Animaniacs and that was kind of their thing. But that pic is clearly being deliberately hyperbolic for engagement purposes anyway.

The smarphone/social media use thing is a bit of an unknown because it's such a recent societal development. Will it be like cars and TVs and still just a normal everyday thing a decades in the future? Or will those things be superseded or abandoned and seeing them in media will be more like seeing a floppy disc or a pager? Will it need to be explained to future audiences what facebook or an influencer was? It's easy to presume not, but the future is very unpredictable.

>>149116107 (OP)
>making up shit to be mad about
>being a furry
Go out with honor, faggot.

>>149116107 (OP)
Bro found like 3 people who said this and thinks everyone on the entire planet is like them.

Just like what you want to and don't worry about what others say.
Take it from me, I don't like a lot of stuff and I dunk on them all the time, the people I'm replying to don't have to take what I say as fact, it's the internet after all everyone says their opinions even if some people don't like it. If they enjoy it, more power to them.

>>149116107 (OP)
Bro found like 3 people who said this and thinks everyone on the entire planet is like them.

Just like what you want to and don't worry about what others say.
Take it from me, I don't like a lot of stuff and I dunk on them all the time, the people I'm replying to don't have to take what I say as fact and I don't gotta take what they say as fact, it's the internet after all everyone says their opinions even if some people don't like it. If they enjoy it, more power to them.

Just learn to ignore, because some mfs will lie out their asses just to one up you.

>>149117601
>I don't recall '90s cartoons being nearly that blatantly referential, except perhaps Animaniacs and that was kind of their thin
You're right, but that won't stop twitteretards from being outraged by it.

>>149117275
>calarturas