>>149116446 (OP) Would it not be par for the course if it was? I mean the first two movie villains were killed by the end.
And moments ago he tried to kill Shrek
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 2:44:39 AM No.149117991
Farquaad was being a threat. Charming wasn't (no weapons in hand/all of his henchmen had switched to the good side) https://youtu.be/D4evnt93ji8?si=30PIpzvBrS3HnJul https://youtu.be/jI1vQI7xKDQ?feature=shared
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 3:49:42 AM No.149118710
>>149117331 It takes real effort to make a high-budget CGI animation movie as boring, insipid, uninteresting, unfunny, derivative, manipulative, patronizing, and narratively half-baked as Shrek 2.
>>149117610 Shrek the Third aired on Freeform not long ago
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 4:03:46 AM No.149118880
>>149116446 (OP) The tower fell with him positioned in the window, it doesn't even look like he died.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 4:13:51 AM No.149118998
>>149118784 Puss could have appeared in any other installment, like the first one, instead of having to suffering horrible characters like Fairy Godmother, King Harold and Prince Charming.
This thread feels like an autist with a hateboner for Shrek 2, which I'm pretty sure was critically acclaimed beyond even the first movie. I prefer the first movie, the setting is more to my tastes and it doesn't feel too crowded, but the second was still pretty good.
Now Shrek 3 is one that I've seen several times and every single time it's a blur. I've never seen anything that came after.