>>149138345People still talk about 1940s movies. The reason 1940s animation has a better reception among casuals nowadays is that it "aged better" because it's easier for anyone to like it. Old people, young adults, teenagers. Kids, and toddlers. Cartoons draw more attention at first, but you would be a really dumb person if you told me that Metropolis would be a better movie if it was animated. Yes, there's a good animated movie called Metropolis but I'm not talking about that one. One is better than the other. Cartoonfags saying that animation is better than anything else are like Nintendofags that think that the only good games are Nintendo games, and even though some of them are great they won't try other platforms or developers. Maybe the same could be said about Spiderversefags like you
>>149135901>Evil DeadWow no way. That's like if Shakespeare wrote an excellent Spider-Man comic and then someone else said that Hamlet was better. Of course that's a fact. How is liking the Raimi movies a contrarian opinion? If that was the case then most people that watched them are contrarians. And yes, spiderverse is for adhd people. Gotta love that colorful, creative, and 10 fps snappy animation that's comparable with
>>149130755And I'm not talking necessarily about the action scenes. I'm talking about all the elements in the movie that are too easy to understand because they rely a lot on annoying and overused tropes, and also anything that kids and manchildren automatically like. Without exception. That movie was made for powerlevelfags and people that are obsessed with multiverse shit and variants autism. Ironic how you treat the word iconic as a buzzword. Specially when things from these movies like Miles jumping from a building and believing in himself are called iconic.