>>149208170
Boys are likelier to watch a show with female main characters than girls are likely to watch a show with male main characters.
Most girls explicitly want a show where they can relate and see themselves, while boys don't usually care about that.
Since the networks are trying to reach as many people as possible, shows about girls are the obvious answer.
>>149210884
True. Honestly it baffles me it hasn't yet. Especially for how long it's been around. That's like the perfect boy Canary but it hasn't gotten anything since that edit was made.
>>149213424
Not that anon, but these look great. Also traps can be twinks in drag at times, but they have an easier time making the look convincing than your average twink.
>>149213424
I love how these came out. Twink Mabel looks so cute and the twink Pacifica is full of attitude. I like the choice of shorts too. Admittedly, I'm not really a fan of the usual r63 threads since they're pretty anti-girl-to-boy r63, but looking forward to colors nonetheless.
>>149213549 >I'm not really a fan of the usual r63 threads since they're pretty anti-girl-to-boy r63
To be fair, girl-to-boy stuff generally doesn't inspire as much content or discussion as boy-to-girl.
>>149219955
I don't think it's that. Or at least inherently I don't think one is more inspiring than the other. Just that one lends itself more to gay stuff and that's a smaller group. A much smaller group. And it doesn't really relate to the point I made anyway.