Shitty brats are always cute in a weird way, and they go from pranksters to super villains, from marginal to wealthy, from gross tomboys to fancy and frivolous princesses, from cruel to all to selectively loving and moral, and some are even supernatural or skilled fighters, so there's a broad spectrum there to explore.

Should the West have more of them?
Which is your favorite?

>>149261967 (OP)
Your mental health is not good brother.

>>149261989
Why do you say that.

She needed correction

>>149261967 (OP)
loliniggas write wholl ass paragraphs about how sexy kids are and swear theres nothing wrong with them

I like that her shirt says BRAT.

>>149261967 (OP)
Damn brats, need rape correction

>>149261967 (OP)
Besides Morbucks, there's been a girl in my life like each of these.

>>149262135
You're gonna cost us the thread, you filth.

>>149262172
>nooooo you can't post actress who played character in OP pic!

Pedophile porn addict shitposting threads are cancer and against >>>/global/rules/3 >>>/global/rules/6 and >>>/co/rules/1
OP is a faggot.
Fulfill your civic duty to help purge this board of anarchistic, sociopathic, intellectually regressive youtube/reddit/twitter immigrant subhumans like him who are under the delusion that all of 4chan (instead of just the designated shitposting playpens like /b/, /trash/, /bant/, etc.) is a toilet by reporting this thread en masse.
Here's a link so you don't have to scroll up to the top of the page.
https://sys.4chan.org/co/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=149261967

>Which is your favorite?
Princess Morbucks for me. She's a cartoony villain, which makes her funny. A brat like Tid Pao Souphanousinphone is less cartoony in design and in setting, which for me makes her more realistic and the fact that she's a criminal who steals and sells drugs is creepy for me. Because Princess commits worse crimes but they're impossible crimes, so they're not real.
Stealing and selling drugs? That shit is real! Creepy!

>>149262172
Looks like you were right. Posting actresses is illegal on 4chan because 4chan, like all imageboards, is run by drooling retards

>NOOOOOO I WANT MY GAMING ROOM

>>149262135
Are those the actresses that played Lola and Lana in the live action Loud House? WTF were they thinking posting an image like that?

>>149262245
The only thing sadder than being an internet forum moderator is being a wannabe internet forum moderator.

>>149262419
He has no sense. Does the same in Loud House threads.
He ruins those too.

>>149262419
Yes, that is Ella and Mia Allan
They were thinking about giving adult men BONERS

>>149262436
I was asking why the FUCK these young teenage actresses thought it was a good idea to post a provocative image of themselves on the internet, especially knowing the types of people in the Loud House fandom.

>>149262436
>nooooo, stop posting about Load House in In Loud House threads!
Faaaaag

>>149262468
That's AI generated moron

>>149262154
Care to explain the many stories? How did the Jessica Lovejoy one work? Did she use her position in the church to harass you?

>>149262396
I like how the story of Wylde Pak is about Lily discovering that she'd rather have her brother Jack around than a gaming room.

>>149262468
They are 100% pure SoCal trash bitches. The only thought in their head is forcing men to CUM
>>149262479
What?

We really need to get rid of cartoon fags

>>149262537
What a thing to post on /co/.

>>149261967 (OP)
Who is the third one with the orange hair?

>>149262473
Dude, I know you're autistic but let me explain to you how this works: rules exist, technicalities exists, and people exist.
You're one of those who think that as long as you're technically correct that's all that matters, but you're incorrect.
If you keep posting things that people don't appreciate, one way or another you're gonna be stopped even if it's not "acktshually" against the rules.

>>149262605
>rules exist
Where is the rule against it? I have NEVER broken a single rule on a this site
>If you keep posting things that people don't appreciate
Who doesn't appreciate hot young(ON-TOPIC)BIRCHES? Gay faggots maybe

>>149262605
No Anon, the way he thinks is
>I hate these threads about cartoon girls, all these people are sick pedos
>I’ll show them, I’ll get the thread deleted by posting this sexualised photo of real teenage girls I have saved for no particular reason

>>149262637
>Where is the rule against it?
See? You still don't get it. I didn't say there are rules against it, I said there are rules.
The rules allow for you to post things which are related to the Loud House RL actors.
But the rules aren't everything, that's the part you're not getting.
>I have NEVER broken a single rule on a this site
No, but you either don't notice what people appreciate in terms of behavior, or you don't care. Again, the rules aren't everything, and if you insist on posting things that people prefer not to see posted, you're gonna be stopped one way or another whether or not it's against the rules. It works like that in real life too.
Many things are not against the rules or the law but people don't do it where they're not appreciated. Back when vapes were new there were no rules against using them in the subway, and yet no one would have thought of using them there simply because of the social contract.