Why does every modern kids movie feel like it's some sort of LGBT metaphor where the studio made them cut out the most obvious aspects at the last minute.

>

>>149267743 (OP)
Because that's exactly what happened with this movie, and the same thing happened with Inside Out 2.

>>149267743 (OP)
Hell no. Riley and Elio are gayless confirmed. It's over.

>>149268499
I think Lightyear flopping and Riley being based on Pete's daughter probably put s stop to it.
>>149267743 (OP)
>cut out the most obvious bits
Most of Elio was literally redone

>>149267743 (OP)
>feel like
Because you suffer from severe brainrot. And it's really funny that both sides manage to see all these LGBT things that aren't there.

>>149269718
In the case of Elio, rumors of the main character being gay have been around since it was first announced because Molina is gay, anons on /co/ didn't go crazy and spam the board until "queer coding" was confirmed by a disgruntled employee. From what was said and seen from the artbook, it wasn't really that much.

>>149267743 (OP)
>every modern kids movie
you touched yourself
it made your brain rot
trannies and lesbians now live rent free in your head every minute of every day
gay dudes want to sleep with you even when you can't earn enough at your wage slave job to afford a handsy from a hooker
it must suck to be you, sister

>>149267743 (OP)
Because they are.
Elio, Inside Out 2, and Luca had gays that were cut out.

This was because Lightyear and Turning Red, two movies with gay characters, bombed.

>>149270962
>Luca
Wrong! Luca did have a cut romance but it was between Luca and the girl, this can be seen in old storyboards and animatics when the story wasn't just about a friendship between two boys but 3. The third boy, also a sea monster was repurposed as a lackey for the antagonist. Start around the 11 minute mark
https://youtu.be/LpbCatwVfn0?si=95SUQ_t-r2r8HeNa
>Because Lightyear
Also wrong, Luca came out before Lightyear did.

>>149270962
Which character is gay in Turning Red?

>>149271693
I mean, boy bands by themselves are pretty gay so them

>>149267743 (OP)
What is gay about this movie? Please tell me.

>>149267743 (OP)

>>149269261
Absolutely tragic that they think current elio is a masculine boy

>>149268499
Not from a lack of trying.

>>149272264
Rich narcissists clamoring for "muh representation" is nothing new, it's how you get shit like "Disney's first gay character ever!1!1!1" multiple times or checklist tokens like in Lightyear, Strange World, or that elf sibling Pixar movie. Notice that they're careful in which movies they mix gays and ethnic minorities, Elio is a different case because it includes autobiographical elements based on the director like the rest of Pixar's recent movies.
>>149272269
I guess, I haven't seen it. I'm assuming they meant masculine in comparison to the previous version of the movie.

>>149267743 (OP)
Elio is such an awful character design. Every expression he makes look dishonest, his teeth look like the wonky shit an AI shits out, and his outfit's color scheme blends in with the backgrounds.

>>149267743 (OP)
Because it's what the zeitgeist demands and Boomer kvetching can hold it back only so much.

>>149269783
>anons on /co/ didn't go crazy and spam the board until "queer coding" was confirmed by a disgruntled employee.

They were sure plenty of Eilo hate threads about shitting on the character hence about the film flopping and making statement of many get tire of Pixar continuing the trend of ugly beanmouth grubhub trash that they keep shitting out every year.

>>149272255
Basically the creator added some queer coded scenes for elio and made the story focus around being gay.

Disney test screened and realized no body like seeing this shit.

When they reworked the movie it showed that the movie was extremely hallow because the whole movie was originally centered about being gay.

>>149267743 (OP)
because you are an obsessed psychopath.

>>149272864
Esl-kun...
Not that I disagree about it being beanmouth but that was hard to read holy shit.

>>149273224
I thought disney was supposed to be an ally? I guess china money is too big to pass up...

>>149273358
>disney
>ally
this is such a stupid rightoid delusion. disney has never been in gay people's good books, and all their recent first gay evers have been instantly identified as tokenistic garbage. they were shitting on disney before your parents were born.

>>149273358
you know that's made up, right? the hollywood reporter story already broke this down. what supposedly existed before was something like a picture of a boy in his room that implied a male crush, and he liked taking care of the environment and dressing up (which is a pretty common feature in children). that's not "the whole movie", and test audiences didn't give a shit about that, because disney execs had already removed anything like that before screening it. what actually happened at the test screening was that the audience said they enjoyed it but not enough to go see it in a theater.

>>149270962
The 4 girls in the red movie were wet for the boy band the entire film. Probably thinking of a different bean mouth movie, like the kraken one

>>149273358
It's a company first, regardless of the opinions of a few higher ups once it's absolutely clear shit ain't profitable they cut back. They aren't solely focusing on an American or mostly western audience anymore, even reducing it to a small scene that can be edited out isn't enough, it'll get warnings or outright banned in other countries.
>>149273396
You'd think they'd get that, the only people vehemently defending shitty tokensim whenever it got criticized were tumblr era slacktivists, spicy straights, ally normies and disney adults.
>>149273450
Elio caring about the environment mostly amounted to him repurposing junk he'd find at the beach, that's it. Like incorporating into sandcastles, capes and shit, its in the artbook. So it's not like it was particularly preachy either.

>child-lusting groomer faggots now trying to rewrite history and claim that Elio was never meant to be gay
Too bad the internet never forgets,

>>149273553
Gay from the jump or not, he was made for shotacons. Also, after the Strange World debacle, I almost forgive Disney. Almost.

>>149273518
>Elio caring about the environment mostly amounted to him repurposing junk he'd find at the beach, that's it. Like incorporating into sandcastles, capes and shit, its in the artbook. So it's not like it was particularly preachy either.
You mean the garbage drag show for hermit crabs? I looked at the artbook, he was more flamboyant. Now he just seems like a kid that's really big into aliens and getting anal probed.

>>149274213
>Design on the left actually looks slightly cool. Still sucks but has some edge
>final design is the same soft bulbous non-sharp calarts crap people are sick of

>>149274238
Left looks like he sucks cocks and has very short shorts. Right looks like it came straight out of a Grubhub commercial.

>>149274213
It was a real shame. There aren't that many brown shotas.

>>149271693
Priya

>>149274258
>has very short shorts.
so, shorts? that boys wear when in uniform for school ?

>>149267743 (OP)
>Every modern kids movie
That's way too fucking wide a net to cast when you're actually only thinking of, like, 3 Pixar movies anon

>>149267743 (OP)
Becuse Disney wants to make money out of gay representation without including any actual gay representation.

>>149274213
Shotacons have a billion nip stories about sexy perfect little boys to choose from. Why would they ever look twice at brown things with eggplant-shaped faces?

>>149267743 (OP)
ugh pixars art style has gotten so fucking ugly.

>>149267743 (OP)
Why do you see LGBTQ people everywhere?