You are defense attorney your client is a mutant the prosecution attempts to argue mutants do not belong in human but animal Court and use a video in which an X-Men says humans on Elite species and the prosecution says at least species mean not human species therefore not human Court what do you do?

>>149304856 (OP)
Put my feet up because this case is gonna gonna get tossed out the second someone says the words "Dirty mutant."

>>149304856 (OP)
Want to try that again with actual punctuation?

>>149304856 (OP)
If it please the court your honour, if mutants are not human then sleeping with hot mutie women would surely count and beastiality and would have to be outlawed. And who amongst us really wants that?

>>149304869
>>149304927
So should I try to get a particular judge to judge the case that would be very anti-poxicution if I'm going with one of these strategies?

>>149304856 (OP)
>marvel universe
immediately bring in sentient/sapient A.I., whales, anthropomorphic characters, spirits, demons, angels, undead like vampires as witnesses and then simply state that the legal argument of being a "person" being tied to ONLY being a human is not only bigoted but would literally just have all the non-humans have a reason to team up on the humans and utterly destroy or subjugate the humans

>>149304927
>implying a mutant would sleep with a flatscan guy
Either they're dykes or they only fuck mutants.

>>149304998
What about Kamala and Miles?

>>149304856 (OP)
Accept their idiotic argument and have the "animal court" presided by Xavier? After all, only animals are fit to judge other animals.

>>149305085
>>149304856 (OP)
I don't think American law allows an animal to be a judge also the main lead thing you would want to get your client not be tried in animal Court would be they can kill an animal for a lot less with less evidence than they are allowed to kill people and you probably assuming that that's what they want to do to your crying at the condemn an animal for being a mutant.

>>149304856 (OP)
You can't judge any super-powered being, because you are - objectively - not their equal.

>>149304856 (OP)
So I asked the AI to analyze this page and it gave me these interesting things (along with analyzing some of the arguments here but I'm not uploading that.)


Related Considerations

Examine real-world analogies: Native Americans, corporations, or AI seeking legal personhood.

Explore constitutional protections (equal protection clause) and how they might extend to mutants.

Flesh out expert testimony on mutant sentience and social integration to bolster “human” classification.

Which of these angles resonates most? We can develop a full brief around any strategy or dive into legal precedents for non-human personhood.

>>149305183
Who said your client had superhuman abilities, They was specified to be a mutant they could just have something weird or discoloration on their body that's not human normal.

>>149304856 (OP)
if mutants aren't subject to the legal system then they can simply wipe the country of humans immediately and be perfectly lawful.

>>149305816
What are you talking about?

>>149306493
If the legal position is that mutants are not humans and that somehow this disqualifies them from the authority of the human legal system then it is not a crime for a mutant to do anything.

>>149304856 (OP)
Something about African ghost DNA and if Mutants aren't humans than nether are Africans

>>149306533
He's being charged and represented like someone would charge a person's pet the lawyer you is the mutants dad.


>>149306970
I can't tell if that's supposed to be anti-racist against mutants or racist against Africans.

More.

>>149304906
Why?