>A young passionate kid just wanted help out a man he admired.

>Grown man tells innocent kid to fuck off and eat shit instead of being down to earth and telling him hero work is too dangerous

Why Buddy is the villain again?

>>149362394 (OP)
not all heroes are good at how to talk to kids, and this one was SPECIFICALLY pushing all his buttons.
also they're both hideously ugly and I hate you for posting them again

Why ESLs spam threads again?

Bailey Briggs should have stayed homeless. It was endearing to learn this super hero kid was not only a spider man knock off but was actually struggling instead of having everything handed to him like Miles.

>>149362394 (OP)
because his response to rejection was to start killing people.
Real school shooter vibes there.

>>149362394 (OP)
"Why you can't" speak English you dumb esl

>>149362464
ehh that's more ghetto than anything

>>149362394 (OP)
The movie is about fatherhood and Buddy needed a father figure and Mr Incredible abandoned him which lead to him being a criminal
>sooooo its Mr Incredible's fault
no. Its just a theme of the film

>>149362394 (OP)
>he should have just let that ten year old fist fight terrorists.

>>149362394 (OP)
Buddy was annoying and Bob was having one of the busiest days of his life. Genociding supers in your grand plan to become the only hero left is NOT how you deal with one bad day of meeting your hero.

>>149362394 (OP)
That didn't happened, OP

>>149362599
OP didn't say that

>>149363643
Yes it did, Bob could have placated him with "training" for the future but he didn't and made Buddy feel like he had to prove himself

>>149362394 (OP)
If a kid tries helping a firefighter who’s running into a burning building, I’d expect the firefighter to tell the kid to go home so he’s less of a danger to himself and others. Don’t be retarded.

>>149363660
>Bob could have placated him with "training" for the future but he didn't and made Buddy feel like he had to prove himself

Buddy himself said he didn't need or want training because he knew all of Mister Incredibles moves because he was his biggest fan. From the start he just insisted he be made, no, recognized as Bob's partner.

>>149362445
Holy schizophrenia.
>>149362471
Same thing. It's not English.
>>149362503
You are too stupid to bother arguing with. >>149363660
Bob had zero reason to encourage Buddy's self-endangerment. There is literally nothing to gain and much to lose.
>b-but look at what happened!
That's not Bob's fault. If a random homeless guy asks you for money and then kills someone when you say no, you're not responsible for that. Yes, it sucks that Buddy is fundamentally broken, but it's not the job of whoever he latched onto to keep him reigned in.

>>149362394 (OP)
What would Batman and Superman do?

>>149363690
Yeah, he was deadset on helping him, that's why it turned into Buddy trying to prove himself to Bob during an actual emergency instead of making sure they were in a controlled environment in where Buddy could prove himself to Bob. At that moment in time, Bob had the time but not the patience to deal with Buddy because he was too enamored with doing solo jobs before getting hitched.

>>149363711
It's not his fault, but if he'd treated Buddy with more patience and kindness, it's likely that things wouldn't have turned out the way they did. It's just an unfortunate consequence that came down the line to haunt him

>>149362394 (OP)
Because there are plenty of entitled narcissists out there who will become a villain over being told "no"

>>149362599
Nonono, obviously buddy would have used some sort of supertech not his fists.

>>149362394 (OP)
>>149363643
What's with all the ESLs on /co/ lately?

>>149362410
>not all heroes are good at how to talk to kids, and this one was SPECIFICALLY pushing all his buttons.

It's pretty clear that wasn't the first time Buddy tried to invite himself along but the first time he went so far as to call himself Incrediboy; Since he mentions posing for pictures and signing autographs, Bob was much more polite in turning him down the first few times with Buddy not taking the hint. .

What's with cartoon fag's obsession with trying to downplay a characters actions because they were slighted

>>149364073
>lately?

The kid went running into active crime scenes, inviting himself into cars, and had already been bugging Mr. Incredible at the fan club before that.

>>149362394 (OP)
That kid was constantly stalking him, that would try your patience too.

The only think bob could have done better is try to explain how dangerous this shit was without super durability or something, but to be honest he probably already did at some point and buddy just didn’t listen but it would have been nice to see it on screen

>>149362394 (OP)
Mr. Incredible was an asshole throughout the film. I mean, if he was a good person, there wouldn't be a story.

>>149363729
Batman has Tim Drake so eh

>>149362394 (OP)
Yes, that was the point of the scene.

>>149362394 (OP)
The killing?

Yeah, probably because of all the people he had killed.

>>149362394 (OP)
>Why Buddy is the villain again?
pajeet detected

>>149362394 (OP)
Oh, stop making excuses for the selfish little shit. He goes all super-villain just because Mr. Incredible didn't let him live his fantasy? Grow the fuck up, junior.

>>149363729
Clark would kiss Buddy to give Bud amnesia.

>>149362599
Dash was allowed to fist fight henchmen

>>149362426
That's a question you should ask yourself, immigrant.

>>149362394 (OP)
Gramatically speaking, the question words (what, who, and in this case 'why') are to be moved as if they were the answering the question to form the question itself.

That is to say,

"[answer] is why Buddy is the villain again." is the response to the proposed question, and so the movement of the question word to the beginning of the sentence would be:
"Why is Buddy the villain again"
rather than
"Why Buddy is the villain again."

Because when forming a question, the question word moves to fill the position where the answer will be. I'm sure there are exceptions to this general grammatical principle, but it's the reason people are accusing you of having english as your second language. I hope this principle is a generalizable remedy for all future grammatical and syntactical blunders in the english language. I say this with my only other language being barely-conversational spanish, so don't think I'm doing this to judge you. I screw up grammar in foreign languages all the time.

>>149366616
>as if they were [sic] the answering the question
See, I even manage to screw something up while giving this explanation.