>>149379980 Yes I'm sure hundreds of millions were invested into this project and just as much more spent on marketing because the plan was for it to do "so so"
Anonymous
7/13/2025, 6:19:36 PM No.149380239
>>149379993 Whose talking positively about the movie?
Anonymous
7/13/2025, 6:20:26 PM No.149380251
>>149380048 We want someone who likes the ip to direct the movies. Not someone who hates it and wants to eliminate the parts that are important specifically.
Maybe relying on international markets is an outdated strategy in general. >>149380251 >eliminate the parts that are important specifically. What essential parts were removed from this movie? Rgxgr
>>149380463 It's basically the next stage of cope >The theaters will be empty like Marvel's recent movies, you'll see >It will get a rotten critic tomato score at the start >the audience score will be rotten at the start >It will bomb opening week >It will underperform to expectations opening week
>>149380385 Global opening weekend, not domestic. And that's weak for a comicbook movie
Anonymous
7/13/2025, 8:25:07 PM No.149381584
>>149381162 >The theaters will be empty like Marvel's recent movies, you'll see They are empty...outside of the USA. It opened below Jurassic Park's 2nd weekend in several countries.
>>149380200 $500 million is recovering the investment. Studios don't make mega productions to just recover the investment, especially when WB is going through economical struggle