Smurfbros not like this

there's one smurf movie fully animated, it must have come out in 2017 I think, it is pretty decent but i've never seen anyone thank about it ever

>>149431513 (OP)
>Rihanna
do kids now even know who she is

>>149431513 (OP)
>smurfette is a chainsmoker

It has the same director as Shrek 3 and the Puss in Boots movie from 2011

all of american 3d animated movies are the same thing

>>149431513 (OP)
Do you guys Smurfette fucks human men?

>>149432560
>one smurf movie fully animated
>2017
>decent
lol lmao even
it was boring

>>149431513 (OP)
lol, you couldn't foresee this after that fucking awful trailer that came out a couple weeks ago?

>>149431513 (OP)
....so are we going to blame the chuds for this one too? Was it all the evil white misogynists spreading rumors that hurt this clearly perfect in every way movie?

>>149431513 (OP)
Isn't it at best a retread of the first two Smurfs movies where they travel to the modern day and half the movie is the smurfs being wowed at modern things like tvs and cars?

>>149432953
Lefties do not give a fuck about this, nibba.

>>149432953
Why do conservatives want to be victims so badly?

>>149432953
nah they are busy demonizing israel and japan

>>149431513 (OP)
who the fuck is razamel?

Thank fuck. This whole damn franchise is decades past its expiration point.

>>149433125
>past its expiration point

What, you mean back in the 1950s? Who the fuck has ever cared about the Smurfs in the past 50 years

>>149433147

Exactly. Right up there with the Chipmunks.

Is this the one where they cast Rihanna in it? As Smurfette? Rihanna as Smurfette? In the movie? Is this the movie with Rihanna as Smurfette? I think I heard about that.

Why couldn't the smurfs keep up with modern audiences like Garfield does? people still love Garfield (both ironically and genuinely) unlike the smurfs which are just kind of there

>>149433526
Garfield was actually good at some point. Smurfs never was.

>>149432560

That one was just boring af

>>149433170
I know movie studios are notoriously creatively bankrupt, but I don't understand this trend of constantly digging up the graves of these IPs that no kid actually gives a shit about, like Smurfs or Garfield. It's not like they're household names like Mickey Mouse that everyone knows, literally no one cares about these things

>>149433547
They want kids to like them so they can sell crappy merchandise. Thats it.

>>149433526

Garfield is still relevant due memes (Gorefield, Lasagna Cat, Zalgo) and boomer Facebook grandpas.

Smurfs never had that

>>149431513 (OP)
Lost Village chads stay winning, don't call it a grave, it's the future you chose

>>149433056
setting up distractions to prevent you from seeing how terribad the orange man is at his job

>>149433147
the 80s show was cool

The guy who directed Lost Village died in 2020

>>149432560
The Lost Village was probably their best Smurf movie. Weird that they would abandon something like that for their current... attempt.

>>149433571
the garfield and friends show was kino too
>>149433526
garfield has the kind of ironic and nihilistic humor that modern audiences are comfortable with, the smurfs are too wholesome for the modern era, and any attempt to modernize them just comes across as cringe or forced, they should play them completely straight and make 2D animated specials in a vein similar to Moomin every so often

RIHANHA
is smurfette.

>>149433854

Wait, really?

>>149431513 (OP)
The Live Action movies killed the franchise.

>>149433854
This shit literally proceeds the title of the movie itself on a lot of advertising.
Kids probably think "RIHANHA is Smurfette" is the what the movie is called.

>>149431513 (OP)
Rihanna's aged black voice is so mismatched for Smurfette. Did they seriously think her super bowl buzz from two years ago was going to carry this movie?

>>149431513 (OP)
>It's another Smurfs go to the real world movie
Why?

>>149431513 (OP)
>It's another Smurfs go to the real world movie
But why?

>>149431513 (OP)
How many times must they make a movie where Smurfs end up in the real world?

>>149433056
Why do libtards want to blame conservatives for all their own faults?

>>149433125
I wish this whole damn scenario would just fucking stop already. They need to quit try to make modern kids movies of franchises that died too many decades ago and no kid has heard of or gives a shit about. They need to fucking stop it already with shit like Yogi Bear movie, Underdog movie, Pink Panther, all of those 60s through 80s forgotten old franchises that no kid is even mildly interested in, and was even before the time of most of the parents.

>>149433526
Garfield is still kind of relevant since the comic never ended, and there have been a few different animated series keeping the title on life support, plus the holiday specials keep coming around every year.

>>149434326
Smurfs has a show on Nick that's over 100 episodes long and was renewed for season 4. I don't think Smurfs is dead, I think its just that Americans don't care about it.

>>149433526
1. A focused, smarmy protagonist is easier to attract audiences than a giant cast of one-note characters.
2. Cats are more marketable (maybe the most marketable).
3. Smurfs are really gay. As in they're overly caring, happy, pacifists, loving, sensitive, and kind of boring. By comparison, Garfield is kinda cool cause he's a smartass and kicks Odie off the table.

Smurfs are less visually interesting ponies with a way worse gimmick (cutie marks vs. U GOTTA BE SMURFIN' ME).

>>149434362
>I don't think Smurfs is dead, I think its just that Americans don't care about it.
That means a show is dead.

>>149434443
America isn't the only country.

>>149434326
The aging boomers in charge have really lost all concept of time in the last couple decades. They do not understand that a nostalgic childhood movie for parents would be the Spongebob Movie or Monsters Inc.

Not a 60s character that had some reruns sporadically in the late 80s too. Current parents likely have no fucking clue what the hell Underdog is outside of a really stupid Disney movie from 2004ish.

>>149434457
For all intents and purposes, a US based studio that primarily cares about a US audience first, making a movie that depends on US ticket sales needs to stick to a franchise that mostly Americans give a damn about.

Spending hundreds of millions on a franchise only Belgium gives a shit about is the definition of wasting money for no good reason.

>>149434312
Probably because it is conservatives' fault 99% of the time

>>149432560
The Lost Village was great and now everyone should apologise.

>>149433125
Sorry, Fucko. Europeans still love the shit out of it.

>>149434485
Lost Village made all its money overseas. It actually was pretty succesful overseas. They don't care about the US Market, we're just a bonus. There's a reason this movie has the Smurfs going to France and not LA or New York.

This is why Americans should never be trusted with things created by Euros.
The CGI series is produced and written in Belgian and it already has a 4th season in the works.

>>149433812
damn
RIP

>>149433170
>Right up there with the Chipmunks.
The 90s stuff was good.

>>149434661
Because they already went to New York twice. It's been done.

>On June 11 and 12, 2024, a fourth season of the series was confirmed, and the third season was announced to premiere in the summer of 2024 on Nickelodeon, later specified as September 3, 2024. In addition, new concepts for Smurfs shorts and spinoffs are also in the works, particularly a new Johan And Peewit series titled The Tales Of Johan & Peewit.
Did anybody even like those guys? Didn't the Smurfs popularity shove them into the void?

>>149434736
I loved Johan and Peewit episodes when I was a kid.

>>149431513 (OP)
I have a feeling this is gonna make a lot of money in some random South American country.