>>149485287NTA, but I accept that there are real world rich people with wackadoodle family dynamics, enough so to accept this portrayal as plausible unlike some of my fellow anons. What I personally don't accept is the depiction of this dynamic as black and white when we A: don't know a lot about these two people and B: from what we've seen she's a certified trainwreck and he's tired of her shit.
We don't know why the ticket system that people keep focusing on was set up, maybe she was blowing his phone up 24/7 with rich girl problems with party music pumping in the background. We do know she regularly takes recreational drugs, legal and not, has been erratic and over the top since her first appearance, and done several gigantic life changes since she appeared. We know she demonstrated few moral principles before the video post that started this plotline, and she did demonstrate ample ignorance of life basics (not as basic as raisins, though).
Is he actually a terrible person? It sure seems like that, but maybe he's just really tired of her shit and his company is unfairly scapegoated. Is she a terrible person? We've seen ample proof of that, before she started to sponge a moral stance from the people she attached herself to less than 24 hours ago. Is this whole storyline pretty shit? Yep.