Anonymous
7/23/2025, 9:58:20 AM No.149516285
Why did this movie cost 450 million to make and market?
Could have been profitable if it was reasonably budgeted
Could have been profitable if it was reasonably budgeted
Replies:
Thread 149516285 - /co/ [Archived: 229 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 10:01:15 AM No.149516315
Money Laundering probably.
The CIA invest heavily in Hollywood
The CIA invest heavily in Hollywood
Replies:
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 10:07:25 AM No.149516371
>>149516285 (OP)
It'll likely be profitable by next week. The film hasn't even been out two weeks and it still doing incredible numbers daily, be patient.
It'll likely be profitable by next week. The film hasn't even been out two weeks and it still doing incredible numbers daily, be patient.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 11:20:10 AM No.149516710
Replies:
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 11:27:36 AM No.149516735
>>149516710
Man of Steel did incredible numbers, it was one of the highest grossing films of 2013.
If Superman was doing the same numbers as Joker 2, I'd be worried.
Man of Steel did incredible numbers, it was one of the highest grossing films of 2013.
If Superman was doing the same numbers as Joker 2, I'd be worried.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 11:29:11 AM No.149516741
>>149516735
Lol this blatant shilling. Man of Steel underperfromed in WB's eyes. That's why they shoved Batman and Wonder Woman in the sequel. And that was in 2013. Adjust for inflation and that movie made 940 million dollars in 2025 money. Superman isn't going anywhere near 900 million.
Lol this blatant shilling. Man of Steel underperfromed in WB's eyes. That's why they shoved Batman and Wonder Woman in the sequel. And that was in 2013. Adjust for inflation and that movie made 940 million dollars in 2025 money. Superman isn't going anywhere near 900 million.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 11:56:02 AM No.149516841
>>149516710
It's doing less than MOS
It's doing less than MOS
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 12:03:17 PM No.149516877
>>149516741
>Man of Steel underperfromed in WB's eyes. That's why they shoved Batman and Wonder Woman in the sequel.
Totally nonsensical. Superman Returns underperformed and they didn't give it a sequel with Batman and Wonder Woman, they killed it. Franchise movies that underperform don't get sequels.
They shoved Batman and Wonder Woman into BvS because they wanted to rush a DC cinematic universe that could compete with Marvel's cinematic universe. Man of Steel performed so well they figured it could be the starting point for that universe. Movies that underperform don't become starting points for massive cinematic universes. Remember The Mummy? It was supposed to start Universal's Dark Universe. After it underperformed, they didn't make a sequel with Dracula and Frankenstein, they just cancelled the whole thing.
Man of Steel made 940 million dollars in 2025 money. That is an astounding amount of money. It made that much because it didn't underperform. Man of Steel did very well in theaters, which is why it was the 9th highest grossing film of 2013.
>Man of Steel underperfromed in WB's eyes. That's why they shoved Batman and Wonder Woman in the sequel.
Totally nonsensical. Superman Returns underperformed and they didn't give it a sequel with Batman and Wonder Woman, they killed it. Franchise movies that underperform don't get sequels.
They shoved Batman and Wonder Woman into BvS because they wanted to rush a DC cinematic universe that could compete with Marvel's cinematic universe. Man of Steel performed so well they figured it could be the starting point for that universe. Movies that underperform don't become starting points for massive cinematic universes. Remember The Mummy? It was supposed to start Universal's Dark Universe. After it underperformed, they didn't make a sequel with Dracula and Frankenstein, they just cancelled the whole thing.
Man of Steel made 940 million dollars in 2025 money. That is an astounding amount of money. It made that much because it didn't underperform. Man of Steel did very well in theaters, which is why it was the 9th highest grossing film of 2013.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 2:56:46 PM No.149517594
>>149516285 (OP)
becasue its not so much about this particular movie making money but about using it to help repair dc's image after snyder. and its don't its job. well liked critically and by fans and will probably turn a small profit.
becasue its not so much about this particular movie making money but about using it to help repair dc's image after snyder. and its don't its job. well liked critically and by fans and will probably turn a small profit.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 3:11:59 PM No.149517676