Did MJ voice this character? - /co/ (#149527456) [Archived: 15 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:12:50 AM No.149527456
Moonwalk
Moonwalk
md5: 88c4427e1c06cf06b4c0659bad01ea7b🔍
I miss MJ
Replies: >>149527573 >>149527626 >>149528106 >>149529307 >>149529498
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:14:24 AM No.149527485
When The Simpsons would only have a celebrity on if they'd voice an original character or a parody of themselves.
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:19:00 AM No.149527573
>>149527456 (OP)
Yes, but for weird contractual reasons he was credited under an alias.
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:22:24 AM No.149527626
>>149527456 (OP)
Speaking wise? Yes but was credited with a pseudonym and wasn't allowed to actually sing so they got a sound-a-like for musical numbers
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:47:35 AM No.149528106
>>149527456 (OP)
He actually raped me while recording this episode. He kept driving back and forth between the studio and Neverland Ranch to fuck me in the ass every three or four lines. Al Jean was pissed because it kept everyone waiting at the studio until 5 AM when he finally finished his last line. He had a scene with Flanders but it was cut because no one wanted to keep waiting around for him to come back again. He was a great guy.
Replies: >>149528930 >>149529262
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 5:53:49 AM No.149528930
>>149528106
IKYFL
Replies: >>149529330
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 6:00:15 AM No.149528992
HEE HEE
UNGH
SH'MON!
DIDDLY!
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 6:28:39 AM No.149529262
>>149528106
KWAB
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 6:34:12 AM No.149529307
>>149527456 (OP)
well he died in 2009 which was 8 years before Bart was even born so how could it be? the idea of Michael Jackson taking an interest in a preteen he's never even met is ludicrous
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 6:37:40 AM No.149529330
>>149528930
What makes you say that?
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 6:53:22 AM No.149529498
1559617130469
1559617130469
md5: e8776a5d0f5f405c98fec871d2b78a1e🔍
>>149527456 (OP)
>still can't see this legally anywhere because of Al Jean and James L. Brooks
Replies: >>149530375 >>149530658 >>149531052
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 8:18:52 AM No.149530375
>>149529498
Why those two specifically? I thought this came as a demand from the Disney higher-ups
Replies: >>149530992
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 8:48:03 AM No.149530658
>>149529498
Dee vee dee
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 9:26:15 AM No.149530992
>>149530375
>Why those two specifically?
They both watched that Leaving Neverland documentary and decided they didn't want to be associated with MJ anymore
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2019/mar/08/michael-jackson-simpsons-episode-pulled-by-producers
Replies: >>149531026
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 9:30:46 AM No.149531026
>>149530992
Didn't all the stuff in that turn out to be fake?
Replies: >>149531039
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 9:32:33 AM No.149531039
>>149531026
Yeah, but you don't see any of them apologizing and putting the episode back on, do you?
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 9:33:55 AM No.149531052
>>149529498
Physical media chads stay winning.