Were the 1890s the worst decade for animation? - /co/

Were the 1890s the worst decade for animation? - /co/ (#149540185) [Archived: 21 hours ago]

Anonymous

7/24/2025, 11:50:44 PM No.149540185

Livingpicturesth00hopw_0052R

md5: 9ff01b727d3c545154b7f52bfdd1ea9a🔍

>no animation longer than 6 seconds
>no plot
>no characters
>that horse cartoon gets really old after a while

Replies: >>149540245 >>149541873 >>149543132 >>149543178 >>149543280 >>149545193 >>149545240 >>149549778

Anonymous

7/24/2025, 11:53:56 PM No.149540245

>>149540185 (OP)
1890s were the peak. Yes there were fewer shows but they were consistently high quality.

Replies: >>149540930 >>149544324

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 12:33:05 AM No.149540930

>>149540245
This. We had it so good

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 1:33:30 AM No.149541873

>>149540185 (OP)
No this was back when animators could draw

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 2:56:52 AM No.149543132

>>149540185 (OP)
What's a bad miracle? They got a word for that?

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 2:59:28 AM No.149543178

>>149540185 (OP)
Nah, it gave us Garfield and Friends, plus Japan had plenty of great anime during the 80s

Replies: >>149543229

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 3:01:05 AM No.149543214

Nobody is need me 130 minute long slop with "deep characters" and "plot". Just read a book, queer.

Replies: >>149543733

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 3:01:45 AM No.149543229

standard_James_Abram_Garfield__photo_portrait_seated

md5: 58280cd00b93c66222ccf35eaa2dcc0b🔍

>>149543178
>Garfield and Friends
Unless you're referring to him I dunno about that one

Replies: >>149543272

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 3:04:03 AM No.149543272

>>149543229
>When someone hates your show so much they assassinate you.

Replies: >>149544372

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 3:04:20 AM No.149543280

>>149540185 (OP)
>>no characters
I see two characters.

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 3:12:06 AM No.149543424

pauvre pierrot

md5: eb29742893f9e5497fa96472087cbe59🔍

I wish I had the sound for this one. You don't get stories like this any more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4FrX3-XUbY

Replies: >>149544324 >>149547797 >>149551240 >>149551336

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 3:29:04 AM No.149543733

>>149543214
Shut up retard

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 4:01:18 AM No.149544324

>>149540245
>>149543424
Damn straight.

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 4:04:17 AM No.149544372

>>149543272
even haters were better back then.
Now that's dedication.

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 5:01:10 AM No.149545193

nmplyd

md5: a43f370a1f43d365311335255d80bd9f🔍

>>149540185 (OP)
Not everyone can afford horseback. I can't stand this new propaganda that plagues our common man with these delusions of grandeur

Replies: >>149550899

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 5:04:12 AM No.149545240

>>149540185 (OP)
Nah it was soulful

Replies: >>149546367

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 6:17:56 AM No.149546367

>>149545240
for you maybe

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 9:04:10 AM No.149547797

>>149543424
Neat!

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 2:06:06 PM No.149549778

>>149540185 (OP)
What people expect to do that year though?

Anonyrnous

7/25/2025, 2:55:32 PM No.149550228

1658290975369

md5: c16c8c24547000d13c54a7b1219aedb0🔍

Zoetropes undefeated https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKEwnhc8ItY

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 3:51:04 PM No.149550899

1753328820602

md5: 9c281c97937e212aea8c66b847ef7afd🔍

>>149545193
Some of these guys are lookin a little too portly and well-fed to pass as "depressed"...

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 4:19:32 PM No.149551240

>>149543424
Honestly one of my favorite animations.

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 4:27:52 PM No.149551336

>>149543424
Here it is with sound:

https://youtu.be/BteD1bOIs0Y?si=sI6QhZ1EfuF3LtsG

Anonymous

7/25/2025, 6:10:33 PM No.149552662

lionschauvet

md5: ec2a11decb5e842647069a26e378adfe🔍

I prefer the 18900s (BC) myself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPQRylcPZDI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBjH9W6qpmY