>characters you like that will never get a good adaptation
Pic related is destined to be molested by the likes of Kevin Smith and Mark Waid fucking nauseating.

The crossover between him and Batman 66 was also quite pathetic.

Mark Waid's Green Hornet was fine

And Matt Wagner's Green Hornet stuff is right there you plebeian

>>149558100
>Mark Waid's Green Hornet was fine
Opinion discarded.

>>149558124
articulate what was wrong with it

>>149558155
It wasn't about the Green Hornet. It was a psuedo reboot with a female Kato

>>149557989 (OP)

>>149559163
Shit character with like 2 memorable stories and 1 of them is when he's a bad guy who kills everyone.

>>149559364
It's funny how hard /co/ seethes at this great character

>>149559364
Hal is far more complex and human than both Batman and Superman, kys faggot

>>149559775
>>149559415
Kyle is far more interesting especially guven his relationship to Alan Scott. And if you disagree? Then Fuck You.

>>149559775
That's why he sucks. Complexity doesn't suit mainstream superheroes.

>>149560752
So every character should be a one note carbon copy? Shut the fuck up

Batman of course

>>149557989 (OP)
The Shadow's pretty much screwed when it comes towards any future adaptations

>Conde Nast is full of morons who have done nothing but sit on the rights and block others from using the IP outside of comics
>the movie got the atmosphere right but bungled the character
>most people don't know he inspired Batman and only old people watched the radio show
>he's entering the public domain soon which means people will make bad horror movies of him
>characters inspired by him (Rorschach, V, Moon Knight, Carmen Sandiego, Cybersix, etc) have been changed significantly in adaptations to the point any clear influence has been removed or diluted

Best case scenario is people comparing him to the Benadryl Hat Man and he becomes a creepypasta/ARG/analog horror character.

>>149562758
I wish heroes could return to wearing trenchcoats.