Are kid afraid of sharp angles?

>>149710336 (OP)
>tags:reverse_bimbofication

>>149710336 (OP)
At least one massive pussy with a pain in the ass mother was. Remember every time you see something like it this it was some single wuss ruining shit for everyone.

>>149710336 (OP)
It's not kids who are scared of this, it's creepy adults who spend way too much time thinking about kids and want to lock them in social Faraday cages until they turn 18, then release them into the world like the human equivalent of a Chihuahua, constantly shaking and in a panic, ten seconds from crashing out over any little thing.

>>149710400
We get it: you're pro-pedophile.

>>149710336 (OP)
Rounded ones save money in animating.

>>149710336 (OP)
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-09-03-ca-5843-story.html

>Although Q5--a consulting company made up of Ph.D.s in psychology as well as marketing, advertising and research professionals--has done some work with prime-time television, its extensive involvement with ABC’s children’s shows is unusual for television.

>ABC and Q5 believe that the new slant will make the show more accessible to children, especially to little girls who might find the new Janine more appealing. Q5’s work with writers included a separate seminar on the little-girl audience. “The fact that she is now warmer I think is fine,” Trias said.

Nothing like hiring a bunch of academics to suck the soul out of something in an attempt to appeal to an audience not interested in the first place.

>>149710336 (OP)
What's that note about 'slutty'? I can't make out the scribble at the start. I don't remember any incarnation of Janine being slutty.

>>149710336 (OP)
Right genuinely looks better

>>149710336 (OP)
This marks the only time I know of that a character's redesign was explained in the narrative of the show.

>>149710355

Reverse?

>>149710938
I like how their evidence for their reasoning was nothing. Based on absolutely nothing. They just said a bunch of crap and insisted they were right.

>>149710400
That's how you get zoomers,big surprise.

>>149711806
But, Anon! They have Ph.D.s!

>>149711806
>>149712069
why is anti-intellectualism so common online?

>>149710355
Based

>>149710336 (OP)
Yeah, when they're 2 or 3 years old, if you're still afraid of angles at 11 you probably have some sort of autism

>>149710998
that's a smushed up ampersand, i get your trouble realizing what it is because it does looks like someone crushed it with their fist

>>149712525
There is no one more controlled and dependant upon the system than intellectuals, while hypocritically insisting upon their distinction from it. You’d have to be stupid to not view the modern intellectual with great skepticism and scorn.

Whether something is right, wrong, or even with merit isn’t the object of intellectualism: it’s to make whatever pill your given easier to swallow because “Experts agree: it tastes good! (They’ve never tried it)”

>>149712525
Because they ruin perfectly good arguments by winning.

>>149710357
There was always something like collectiveshout harassing the publishers of content for tedious details. Always orbiting
>this female character is too attractive. Make them uglier than me.

>>149710400
>it's creepy adults who spend way too much time thinking about kids
Negative. Its creepy adults spend too much time thinking about themselves and their feelings who only care about their internal experience. The moms who caught Janine out of the corner of their eyes while trying to ignore their kids with the electric babysitter were annoyed with it. It hurt their feelings. That's all that matters to them. "Think of the children" is just rhetoric to get what they want.

>>149710938
>Nothing like hiring a bunch of academics to suck the soul out of something in an attempt to appeal to an audience not interested in the first place.

>>149712525
because a lot of midwits use their C+ average associates degrees to act superior to everyone else while acting like they're a scholar.

>>149712525
Q5 literally did base their findings on nothing, though. Things that are still stuck in the industry today like "children want to see a child their age as the hero" has their basis from them, but is based on no actual data or research what-so-ever, according to people working on the show The Real Ghostbusters. Instead Q5 were extremely talented at telling an executive what they wanted to hear. They were the equivalent of ChatGPT more than academics.

>>149713161
Examples?

>>149710336 (OP)
Only reason anyone really cared about Janine was they had a scret crush on her and they removed most of that in the redesign.

>>149713962
What an interesting way of saying that the old design was appealing while the new design had no appeal.

>>149710871
Better than being a draft officer who abducts kids to fight in Ukraine like you
>>149712525
It wasn't dumb people who got elected and shaped the world into what it is now, anon
Modern intellectuals genuinely think you could remake all 8 billion people on this planet from the genes of just two individuals

>>149713966
I meant most viewers just wanted to see Ghostbusters busting ghosts.

>>149710400
Immurement, anon
The term you're looking for is "Immurement"