Thread 150875230

>Yes YES the 1935 drawing has Superman The ORIGINAL Superhero trunks with visible piss seam
>But due to simplifying and cutting corners for himself not only piss seam is gone but also body texture from Action Comics 1 to Action Comics 2 is gone, as well as little details like wrappings on legs and cuffs
>there is NO depiction of original Clark Kent or Superman drinking or eating anything
>there is however a depiction of original Clark Kent (and Bruce Wayne even more so) smocking
>years later they Still make superhero live action movie , tv shows, flicks and kinos with seamless costumes where actors have no way of pissing or shitting or pretty much anything
>?????????
>God guided Shusters hand into making superhero costume an Ultimate depiction of the FACT that in 99% of fiction , even when it is about "real" people without superpowers you don't see characters having any sort of normal human needs at all
>superhero costume becoming THE symbol Having to transcend the carnal desires just at very least in order Not to piss and shit yourself

>>150875230 (OP)
What

>>150875241
>241
nice
Also /notice/ that original Superman costume is BLACK AND WHITE , it is also very important

>Normal triangle is a representation of Normal flow of things, from Top to Bottom, Water falls down , Gods or Kings rule few who overpower everyone else
>Yes YES original 1935 S logo is a "police" shield, but besides Action Comics #1 cover insides it was always an Upside down triangle S logo
>representing Clark Kent, a guy from lower class who doesn't obey anyone or anything, who Can't be overpowered by anyone or anything
>but then, in Action Comics #5 briefly Logo gets more familiar Diamond shape before it reverts to a triangle for many issues more until
>but what if it Isn't diamond
>what if it is 2D representation of pyramid just like triangle Except it was turned a Little bit upwards
>because Human Eyes (THE only observation tool humans have Ultimately!) are constructed Certain and only Exact way the Further object moves the Parallel lines become More and More stretched and tilted against each other, it is Entirely possible if object is infinitely Deep-Long that the Parallel lines will eventually cross at least from the PoV of Human Eyes
>Perception IS Reality
>Superman eventually going to the 3D direction , just like inside comics Clark Kent, in 1934, moved in 4D ie went Back in time
>Superpowers are unrealistic only when they are 3D, but not unrealistic as soon as they become 4D in nature
>it is why The Human Mind can Time travel (4D move) into the (representation, unless photographic memory and Ultra-Honest Person) of the past via memories and into the future Based on the past, and can Create and Destroy things in infinite capacity (5D move) in its setting
> Three angles of Triangle S logo represent Super-Strenght and Super-Density which both supply Super-Speed because without either of two Superman either Would NOT be able to be Super fast Or he would injure or even Kill himself if he ever attempted moving at speed Too fast than what His density allows
>5 angles of Diamond shape then represent eventual going Beyond those 3 powers
>which Superman did

Jesse, what the FUCK are you talking about?

>>150875593
>which Superman did
BUT ONLY (S)IN(CE) ACTION COMICS #11 WHERE HIS LOGO REVERTED TO A TRIANGLE ONCE AGAIN!
>BUUUUT Upside down pyraMID is NOT a 2D representation of diamond
>the Notion of an image going Beyond 2D
>As well as the Fact that If it is an upside down Pyramid then there are More than just 5 angles
>The PREMISE of a Promise that Eventually Superman Will have more than 3 base + (even, even Tho these were Also predicted at That time of Action Comics #5 release) 2 additional powers ie x-ray vision and super-hearing Introduced into Clark Kent version since Action Comics #11 BUT RE-USED from Bill Dunn version of Superman as the concept itself
>which Is absolutely true today even If certain "creative" (?) entities want to chain Superman Only to certain abilities of his body
>BUT THE GENERAL PERSPECTIVE DOES NOT CARE
>GENERAL CANON SUPERMAN HAS ALL AND ANY SUPERPOWER

>>150875230 (OP)
>>150875334
>>150875593
>>150875737

this is some serious schizophrenia, but I must point out that A) that isn't what a piss seam looks like in underwear, and B) those aren't underwear.. they're trunks, like what boxers wear. Their purpose is to conceal the bulge in tights.

Not your blog.

>>150875606
From a perspective of 2D being a 3D being can shrink or grow, but in 3D reality will remain the same
Superman , Action Comics #1 - 10 one, has abilities of someone who otherwise Has to be a Giant, and yet he is size of a normal adult man, not midget or manlet, but also not anyone on the Taller side either (only because of George Reeves actor Superman/Clark Kent will gain additional notion that he is supposed to be Taller than normal, but Still even at That height he isn't supposed to be That strong).
That's Why first ever shrinking superhero Doll-Man is exactly that, he is tiny, but because he is Normal sized man strong he can tear guns in half and punch subjective giants into knockout (and for Those times, before 1941 superhero comics censorship and its snowball consequences to the modern times None of the violence was seen as 100% safe and with 0% chance that a K.O. will be actually fatal or will have morbid consequences shortly after).
Because it all traces to Philip Wylie's Gladiator, where Hugo Danner, because of his average height is unassumed by many. Especially that is evident during his wrestling episode where people think a much bigger guy will easily accidentally murder him (again, back to pre-1941 notion of Any kind of violence).
And CLARK KENT is created within notion of time travel, even if that wasn't Officially published, for Siegel it definitely was reality, just like how K-Metal from planet Krypton was absolutely 100% Canon for Him as evidenced by Superman #170 "old Kryptonian civilization" bit where a forgotten artifact gives Jor-El (II, for Siegel it was Jor-El II) abilities that original Jor-L had, because it is 1960s instead of 1930s, but "super-powers" (first appearance of the word is Joe Shuster's 1936 sketch) Are "timeless" because Clark Kent is Out of His time, out of His fateful death, in Any version really. He is Free to do Anything.

>>150875756
>that isn't what a piss seam looks like in underwear
>>150875756
>those aren't underwear.. they're trunks, like what boxers wear.
yeah, with piss seam... because they are trunks

>>150875908
>>150875756
Oh and, ofc, Superman DOESN'T wear (1930s) boxers shorts, and "even" 1930s wrestlers ones often times didn't come with piss seam (as seen 1938 movie adaptation of Gladiator) UNLIKE 1935 Superman's trunks which Clearly depict one >>150875334
, which you either didn't even bother to look up or you are some dumb engagement bot or pshychopath who goes off with lying without any good reason

That is the Intended irony of the character, he is literally (modestly) absolutely naked as "Superman" (name he never calls himself first btw) (+ cape and logo because Siegel thought they are cool, Shuster originally intended just everything else which is, Ironically, almost nothing) and yet he Is Clark Kent, all covered up in uncomfortable jacket, shirt, hat, glasses, shoes, pressured by every single fucking law and with a real name and an address in case he will ever act like Slam Bradley (directly inspired by pre-Clark Kent The Superman 1933- early 1934) and in that Nakedness he Acts like his Real father did right before death. Same how Bruce is punching badguys with guns just like Thomas did, but he wears mask Because the literal bat inspired him.

Naked Idea....

That's also why it is Naked Snake in Metal Gear Solid 3 and why in Snake vs Monkeys in MGS3 Solid Snake looks exactly like his "father".