4rchive
[
Home
] [
Feed
] [
Search
] [
Report
]
← Home
← Back to /co/
Thread 150906338
20 posts
12 images
/co/
◉
Open Gallery
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 8:42:24 AM
No.150906338
[Report]
>>150908009
>>150908048
>>150908194
Mickey Mouse is gay
shipping.png
md5: 3f13a5c9...
So, Wikipedia decided to describe shipping by using a gay OTP of Mickey with Oswald
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 8:43:39 AM
No.150906352
[Report]
Wikipedia lost their standards a long time ago.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 8:45:43 AM
No.150906373
[Report]
This means literally nothing.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 1:04:38 PM
No.150907826
[Report]
Seems to be a good example of what shipping is, with two public domain characters.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 1:07:49 PM
No.150907833
[Report]
>The main textbook character shipping example is gay furry incest
Uh based????
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 1:16:54 PM
No.150907866
[Report]
This is the kind of shit you would see on TVtropes
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 1:50:54 PM
No.150908009
[Report]
>>150906338 (OP)
what a trash article lmao
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 1:55:28 PM
No.150908038
[Report]
Lolicon_Sample.png
md5: caf37faf...
For me it's lolicon sample
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 1:57:08 PM
No.150908048
[Report]
images (63).jpg
md5: 3e389ade...
>>150906338 (OP)
Wikipedia is based consensus, not material reality or authenticity OP.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:10:51 PM
No.150908106
[Report]
>>150908182
>>150908191
s-l300.jpg
md5: fa1f94e7...
Wouldn't Kirk/Spock be the most logical choice? All modern shipping can be traced back to Star Trek zines from the 70's and 80's.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:24:03 PM
No.150908182
[Report]
>>150911095
>>150908106
Wikipedia has some serious rules about what images can be uploaded there, you can't put a pic of them on the page just like that.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:25:59 PM
No.150908191
[Report]
>>150908195
>>150908106
They chose Mickey and Oswald for being public domain
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:26:42 PM
No.150908194
[Report]
>>150908229
>>150908251
>>150906338 (OP)
If I remember right, Wikipedia rejects primary sources and only accepts secondary sources.
So it's worthless.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:26:51 PM
No.150908195
[Report]
>>150908191
First actual answer in this thread
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:33:38 PM
No.150908229
[Report]
>>150908194
>If I remember right
Stop talking shit.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:35:32 PM
No.150908243
[Report]
15731635.jpg
md5: 8a506790...
I mean, they should kiss
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:37:12 PM
No.150908251
[Report]
>>150908194
Wikipedia has no actual standard on source management, it's case by case down to the moderator.
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 6:34:44 PM
No.150910421
[Report]
wikipedia is so gay their jannies are always on your ass
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 7:02:56 PM
No.150910726
[Report]
It's so over.png
md5: 3fae5500...
>Think this is fake
>Look it up
>It's real
Anonymous
10/19/2025, 7:32:27 PM
No.150911095
[Report]
>>150908182
Journalism, review, and education falls under fair use so they shouldn't need those rules. Or just abolish IP law outright if it's that big a deal, that would work too.
Close ×
<
>