Anonymous
6/8/2025, 7:39:10 PM No.18459938
I want to go back..
Replies:
Thread 18459938 - /fa/ [Archived: 1237 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/8/2025, 7:44:14 PM No.18459942
>>18459938 (OP)
It’s such a great haircut. Why must fat asocials ruin everything?
It’s such a great haircut. Why must fat asocials ruin everything?
Anonymous
6/8/2025, 8:17:50 PM No.18459971
>>18459938 (OP)
>apparently the undercut is IN NOW??
So is this article from 10 years ago or is society so bankrupt be are now recycling culture from barely a decade ago and pretending like it never happened?
>we are doing millennialcore, but BASED and REDPILLED this time!
>apparently the undercut is IN NOW??
So is this article from 10 years ago or is society so bankrupt be are now recycling culture from barely a decade ago and pretending like it never happened?
>we are doing millennialcore, but BASED and REDPILLED this time!
Replies:
Anonymous
6/8/2025, 8:30:28 PM No.18459977
Anonymous
6/9/2025, 4:51:47 AM No.18460227
Never cared for the shaves sides. I like to have some length even if it's slicked back.
Anonymous
6/9/2025, 8:47:58 AM No.18460294
this will always look good if you're attractive, regardless of trends
Replies:
Anonymous
6/9/2025, 4:09:03 PM No.18460501
Anonymous
6/10/2025, 5:20:55 AM No.18460938
I always called it the Richard Spencer
Anonymous
6/10/2025, 5:49:16 AM No.18460960
>>18459938 (OP)
Millennials brought it back, and then zoomers ruined it.
Zoomies literally went to their mom's stylist and said, long on top and short on the side to try to mimic the undercut, and it came out like a fucking head of broccoli.
Millennials brought it back, and then zoomers ruined it.
Zoomies literally went to their mom's stylist and said, long on top and short on the side to try to mimic the undercut, and it came out like a fucking head of broccoli.
