boomer here

can I still wear slim+low rise chinos at age 35 ???

You can do whatever you want big guy

>>18460804

thank you

No. You should be wearing high rise, full cut trousers once you're past 25. Try the Buzz Rickson 1942 model

>>18460803 (OP)
She's so cute bros...

>>18460821
>Buzz Rickson 1942

op here

look, I'm from the era where slim fit was peak of /fa/ and those pants just look hideously ugly for my perception.

>>18460821
These look like they were made out of a paper bag

>>18460821
Nigga I'm not wearing that trash

>>18460821
wannabe temuslop dickies just buy the real deal they are only like $30

>>18460803 (OP)
get to wearing tan chinos + chambray shirt unc

>>18460839
he posted a picture of some gook wearing them 3 sizes too big.
here's the same pants sized correctly. they're the world war 2 khakis. pretty much the pants that popularized khaki pants and the most timeless ones out there.

>>18460821
ugliest chinos I have ever seen

>>18461315
its just because its a 5'2 asian wearing them 4 sizes too big and sagging them like a "gangster"
those are the best ready to wear chinos being made right now by far imo. look at the pics i posted its the same pants but sized right.

>>18461320
They all look comically ridiculous like they were designed for dolls not humans. The material looks like polyester and it's wrinkled. Shill something good next time.

>>18460803 (OP)
No you can't. Stop being a faggot.
>>18460839
No, if you are 35 then most of your childhood and teenage was spent wearing straight, relaxed or boot cut jeans, not slim fit faggotry. That shit became popular only in he 2010's when you would have been in yoru 20's. Most people stick to the style that they used to wear in their teenage. So either you always were a humongous faggot who wore slim and skinny fit even in teenage, or you're lying about your age. If not you wouldn't think straight fit high rise pants look "ugly".

>>18461327
Also, funny how those pants on the left were considered "skinny" in 2009. Today millennials would think they're too baggy because they don't fit like women's yoga pants.

>>18461299

man this is so ugly.

are there any other boomer bros in here? am I really supposed to wear this?

>>18461473
What's "ugly" about them?

>>18461325
nah its a high density west point cotton twill. very high end fabric. as good as khakis can get.
proper cotton chinos have wrinkles. you are used to low quality "permanent press" khakis that are made of plastic, coated in formeldahyde to make them stop from wrinkling and have a disgusting plastic sheen as a result. you can tell right away how much higher quality these are in person. a jpeg can't convey a lot.

>>18461473
yes. that is called a "straight fit" and its from the 1940's. generally the 40's and 50's are considered the most timeless era of menswear. its the most unremarkable and timeless cut of pants. if you asked most people on earth what "pants" look like they would draw something resembling this.
i'm the same age as you, probably older. you're stuck in a mentality where you started learning about fashion during the super skinny hedi slimane era of the trend cycle and you don't know what normal clothes look like. this is normal for millenials and its kinda why we get mocked so hard.

>>18461327
>>18461333
Did you live in a rural community?

>>18461505
Slim fit and skinny jeans didn't become popular anywhere in the world until the 2010's. Most people were still wearing straight and boot cut jeans until 2009-10. The late 2000's were more about low rise. Slim and skinny trend was still a couple of years in the future.

>>18461519
I'm a few years younger than OP and everyone I knew was wearing skinny jeans in 2008, what you mean is turbo normies didn't pick up on it until five years later.

>>18461521
skinny jeans were limited to subcultures like internet fashion nerds and emos until around 2012. reddit didn't even have a denim board until 2011.
i don't know what you're even remembering because the only mens skinny jeans you could buy back then retailed at $200 and $600 and normies were wearing shit like true religion and rock revival boot cuts. i don't live in a flyover.

>>18461524
I live in the UK and just as an example Russel Brand started hosting his Big Brother show in 2005 or something wearing ridiculously skinny jeans and yes everyone thought he was a fag but that show is as turbo normie as you can get and had huge viewership at the time.
People who wanted super skinny jeans WERE buying women's jeans but you could buy slim jeans on the high street in 2008, I know because I still have a pair.
I don't know if you're just a zoomer who doesn't know what he's talking about but the fact you used Reddit not having a jeans board as an argument is weird because only dweebs have ever used that gay site.

>>18461531
2005 fall winter first time skinny jeans were on the runway, and the only men's skinny jeans you could buy retailed at $600 which is like $1800 in today's money.
so yeah only celebrities and superfuture posters were wearing them. save for early scene guys cross dressing in women's jeans.
>I don't know if you're just a zoomer who doesn't know what he's talking about but the fact you used Reddit not having a jeans board as an argument is weird because only dweebs have ever used that gay site.
men's skinny jeans weren't really for sale anywhere at prices normies would spend, until 2012.

>>18461535
Maybe the USA was different or maybe you aren't the fashion historian you think you are.

>>18461536
>or maybe you aren't the fashion historian you think you are.
let's test that really quick. who other than dior was selling men's skinny jeans in 2005?

>>18461542
my assertion is that people were wearing skinny jeans in 2008, I don't think I said mens skinny jeans were widely available, hence why people resorted to buying women's jeans but you keep dismissing that because it doesn't fit your narrative. Slim cuts definitely were widely available though.

>>18461542
>https://web.archive.org/web/20060719105145/http://www.topman.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=17551&storeId=12555&categoryId=38981&langId=-1&top=Y
Here's one of the most turbo normie high street shops in the UK selling skinny jeans for £30 in 2006. I could probably find something earlier from a more niche store but this should suffice. Don't even bother responding.

>>18461573
alright you won.

>>18461580
Wasn't expecting you to be gracious. I wasted so much time wrestling with the waybackmachine for that "victory" so I think we both lost in the end. gg

>>18460803 (OP)
Stop wearing this shit, millennifag.

>>18461327
Nah, you're just dumb. Slim and skinny fit were already fashionable in the late 2000's. Don't believe me? Go ask your mommy.

>>18461535
Here's Paramore in 2007. A very popular band and everyone including Lil fucking Wayne wanted to look like an emo artist. Just delete your messages, Timmy. And go to sleep.

>>18461797
We're talking about men's pants, retard. In the 2000's you'd be seen as a colossal faggot if you wore skinny/slim jeans, because only women wore pants that tight back then. Men wore straight or boot cuts.

>>18461803
Nah, you idiot. You absolutely wore skinny or slim fit if you were a young dude and wanted to get laid. Chicks loved emo guys. Straight and boot cut was for dads and granpas, you loser. We literally went from one extreme (Karl Kani baggy jeans) to slim and skinny overnight. Go to bed and stop watching those cringe "video essays" by people who know nothing about anything.

>>18461806
LMAO your gay little gang of emo faggots wasn't the entire world. Nobody wanted to fuck emo faggots. Maybe emo and goth chicks, but not you homos.

Do you think your faggy emo band was bigger than Linkin Park in 2007? None of them are wearing gay ass millennial skintight skinny jeans.

>>18461806
You mean wear skinny jeans and bullshit everything to get broken teenage emo girls. People who did this were predators. He’s partially right. Normal people didn’t have to pretend to be emo, pretend to like shitty music, and wear skinny jeans just to impress someone in a subculture. Today it’s no different than baggy Y2K shit. It’s all a LARP, bullshitting, manipulating, and borderline predatory. What’s always best is dressing inherently that looks good on yourself.

Besides, those girls back then into skinny jeans were manipulated by media to find emo boys attractive. Where are they now? Surely not happily married.

If you have to wear a costume to attract a girl, you really weren’t that attractive to begin with. She liked your outfit, not yourself.

>>18461802
The irony with all these emos back then is that today they all look like JD Vance. Almost none of them retained their skinny bodies, except those who became Antifa crust junkies.

>>18461813
LMAO you absolute fucking virgin. Name me one hot chick from your school that listened to Linking Park. I fucking dare you. That's right, you fucking can't. Why? Because no chick you wanted to fuck listened to that shit. Linking Park was something the lame dudes who thought that wearing a button up shirt was gay, and that DC skate shoes were cool.

Now if you were a cool guy like me who actually had some girls chasing, you would be wearing Nike AF1 mids with slim or skinny fit jeans. Wearing Karl Kani, LRG, or Ecko jeans was still accepted in the late 2000s, but it was getting a bit outdated NGL.

>>18461815
Listen to me, moron. Every girl loved Green Day, MCR, Paramore etc. Guys loved that shit too. Many were too embarrassed to say it because liking the same things as women was "gay". Even though "gay" men like me pulled more chicks that all the hetero dorks who never had chicks in their teens.

>>18460803 (OP)
I have a friend who is 33 and exclusively dresses in hoodies and band shirts with chinos.

>>18461817
DON'T FALL FOR THIS HE'S GONNA JACK OFF TO YOUR HIGHSCHOOL CRUSH AND SEND YOU A CUM TRIBUTE. HE'S DONE THIS TO ME 3 TIMES NOW!

>>18460845
They really do.

>>18460845
Because they're new and unwashed. Once the excess starch is washed away after a few washes they'll soften up and stop shining like waxed paper.

>>18461813
>Linkin PArk
>emo
what the fuck you must be indian

>>18460803 (OP)
Yes

>>18460826
:'^)

>>18460803 (OP)
yeah, just stay fit so you can look good in basics

>>18461519
Skinny jeans were an emo trend from 2003ish, but they got a lot more popular with fashionable people in 06/07 because of indie/hipster style. Normies adopted them in 2012. The same happened with American Apparel hoodies and disco pants.

Baggy/oversized fit become cool with fashionable people in 2016

>>18461580
>>18461585
2007 youtube kino joking about hipsters' skinny jeans
https://youtu.be/kAO4EVMlpwM

>>18461803
they're wearing bootcut jeans yet they like look colossal faggots anyway