Picrel has two examples because I'm not sure whether she had anything on beneath the blazer or not. All the pics were side-on so I can't tell. If she did have a skirt on, the blazer went further down the leg than the skirt, like in the image on the left. Also the woman I'm thinking of what wearing white rather than black or pink tights.
TRAITS OF THE BRIDE:
>WASP
>Bit of a tomboy in her youth, very athletic
>Was one of the "cool kids" nevertheless
>works as a banker
What's the statement behind such a non-traditional wedding "dress"? If the dress alone does not carry a decisive meaning, consider the traits above when crafting your reply.

If you wanna dress like a man go right ahead but people are gonna judge you for it.

>>18462140
It wasn't a totally masculine outfit. The blazer was cut fairly masc but she had no pants on her legs, only tights, and was wearing heels.

>>18462137 (OP)
>What was she thinking
SEXXOO

Real talk: the blazer shoes she dominates every woman in her social circle. She's the girl boss. Her man is kept in check by amazing sex and she's sub to him in that way and that way only.

Based on your background info it's spot on.

pegging

>>18462137 (OP)
That she's a narcissistic feckless whore and is going to ruin your marriage and household. It's a red flag that she is unwittingly giving you. Notice it and save yourself from this witch while you still can.

>>18462137 (OP)
>Yeah, we're in an open marriage.

>>18462137 (OP)
that she is a whore anon

these kind of threads are the best cure for being an incel.

just imagine this same thread, but with all genders reversed...

>women posting a dude wearing a colorful blazer, just because he thought it was fun, or he was trying to be fashionable/stylish
>"why did he wear this?" "what statement is he making?"
>other women replying that he's being narcissistic, or a cuck, or a cheating loser. encourages other women to break up with him

once I've started doing this, I've realized that women are just normal people living their life, just like men do