Does anyone else absolutely hate wide pants? I'm not talking about hating it as a trend. This looks so fucking awful. It's a mix of baggy with parachute-style features. If you're a tall and decent looking guy, why would you forcefully make yourself wider instead of taller and slender? I'm not advocating for skinny fits either, but just clothes that fit your body type well.

>>18469540 (OP)
Could've have chosen a picture without a retarded fag, but then your argument would look silly

>>18469540 (OP)
Fucking weirdo

>>18469540 (OP)
Fuckest thy mother

>>18469540 (OP)
nah i agree with you OP. oversized clothes are retarded and i instantly judge all who wear them. that shit looks childish as fuck

>>18469608
w2c

Jesus Christ is the Son of God, Who died for our sins and rose from the dead to give us the free gift of eternal life. He also promises to heal your body. You can ask Jesus for His gifts.

>>18469540 (OP)
it's the 2020 equivalent of skinny jeans

>>18469540 (OP)
I like the option to change silhouette, that's where 50's-70's has a lot more style variation and we're starting to welcome back, plus wide is just comfortable at times, I like letting my legs breath or layering pants under when it's cold

i look really fuckin good in skinny fit but i like wide better. i think i'll keep my skinny fit stuff just so i can switch it up once in a while.

>>18469761
I judge you

>>18469540 (OP)
>why would you forcefully make yourself wider
more presence, take up more visual space, less uptight of a vibe, ability to layer, ability to tuck a shirt idk tons of reasons man use your noggin.

You are unaware of how to style wide pants

>>18469992
>ability to tuck a shirt
I ain't the president, bro

It’s an attention seeking cope for people who can’t dress well.
>look how different I am bro

>>18470012
Italians dress weird, fucking attention seekers with the bright patterns in the shirt

>>18469995
you've been conditioned to dislike tucking because you grew up wearing women's hip hugger pants. when your pants go up to your waist your shirt stays tucked effortlessly.

>>18469540 (OP)
If you ask me super slim fit and baggy slop are the worst things in modern fashion clothes that fit right are impossible for the average fashion fans

>>18470100
It's like they're wearing their skinny nephew's clothes. Millennials and their skinny fit faggotry have been a disaster for the human race.

>>18470100
it only works on svelte skinny tall twinks.
and to a lesser extent svelte skinny short twinks, with the right tailoring.

>>18469540 (OP)
Baggy fits are cringe, loose fits however are based.
Look at this man of size and groinal prowess.

The problem with kid fashion (under 25s) is it's always an insane overreaction to whatever the previous generation thought was cool. Give it another 5 years and everyone will be wearing tight pants again and only horrible out of touch losers will be in baggy. And just like zoomers are saying about baggy being timeless and skinny being a fad, they'll say their skin-tight pants are timeless and baggy is a fad and they'll say it with that insufferable certainty that kids under 25 always have about opinions that they think are facts

baggy is popular because Gen A/Zs have terrible posture and fat lardo bodies. its to help camouflage the negative effects of chronic internet use by our unproductive society.

>>18470574
>>18470592
You can't dance with bar wenches in skinny jeans
>>18470547

>>18470632
I've watcher that movie, they aren't bar wenches and that is his wife he just married

>>18469540 (OP)
why do millniuncs hate comfort?

>>18469540 (OP)
I beg you wear wide shorts and have tattoos, you loon

People who drag their trouser hems through dirt and dogshit are despicable

>>18471296
with my baggy clothes i wash them until they're done shrinking then i hem them like 1mm just barely floating off the ground in my thinnest soled shoes.
they stack and drape the exact same way over my shoes but the hems stay clean and undamaged.
but don't forget, dragging your hem around was also a millenial trend for like 2yrs.

>>18469993

I feel like girls can pull these off way easier cause of their hips.
After the hips it just kinda flows

Men don’t have that. Shit just looks like a paper bag in the wind

>>18471365
You just haven't got the right material.

I’ve always wore baggy (within reason) pants as a matter of comfort and for years I’ve been told that I look scruffy and poorly dressed. Now all of a sudden I’m fashionable and I look normal. I don’t understand how this works desu

>>18471302
>stack and drape over my shoes
This is a terrible look. What do you have to say for yourself?

>>18469540 (OP)
>this wide pants style looks so awful
>posts picture of someone with his pants around his thighs and a boner
recaptcha: 8gay2

>>18469540 (OP)
>>18469606
>>18469608
retarded
>>18471066
over the knee therefore not shorts
>>18470100
gay and retarded

picrel on the other hand does not make you look like a clown/coping manlet
>chinkshit
it's for reference

>>18472161
You slimy bastard, Ma said I look good in them.

>>18472161
>>18472768
Referring to >>18469608 btw
You are not invited to my birthday party

>>18472769
Anon, this punishment is too cruel

>>18469540 (OP)
I'm only against them because for somereason they're always paired with a low/sag waist line. 1950s suits and the 1980s revamp of loose and boxy suits look comfy af but that's because their waistline is correctly tailored.

>>18472895
I'm sorry, but you brought this on yourself.
*I will save you a piece of cake for after the party

>>18471581
That's part of the design, you see

>>18473460
It not. If you want to sag, get the diaper pants

>>18469540 (OP)
Depends on how "wide." I don't like the whole wide baggy jeans thing like what you've posted. However I can sew decently and have made a bunch of old fashioned trousers. The cut is wider than modern trousers and it's really comfy for gardening in my allotment in. I have some tweed that I'm making some in at the minute (going to make matching waistcoats to go with each pair) after making a test pair from cotton drill but I'm considering ordering more drill so I can have a few pairs for gardening instead of just one. They're ideal raspberry picking trousers. Wide and airy without exposing flesh. The fabric doesn't stick to your legs like hot jeans do. You have to wear long trousers and not shorts because of nettles growing between your plants btw. Can see why peasants and labourers in most societies wear wide trousers.

>>18470547
This

>>18470097
>>18469995

*true as long as they fit properly. If you have excess material then the shirt starts to ride up and you get a flap. The trousers need to either be a very close fit at the waist or have back or side adjusters. This is the case with most of them but there are some that omit this.
Assuming you wear them with braces. This isn't a problem with belts but I prefer braces.

>>18469540 (OP)
They’ve been wearing this style in Japan since 1992 and never stopped. It’ll be cool again when only japs are doing it

>>18472920
Because zoomers are uncultured, negrified degenerates. They can't imagine any pants that go above the crotchline because that's all they've worn. So to them high rise pants are just drop crotch pants and the "excess material" near the crotch is just for the "aesthetics". It's like a monkey trying to ape humans without understanding a lick of how and why it's done.

>>18470016
>patterns intimidate incel trannies

>>18475015
>But ... but ma Urkel?
Fucking mental patients can't imagine high rise without taking it to a retard extreme

>>18475024
High waisted pants sit there because that is where your waist is, negrified retard. What you think is "high rise" is just mid rise sitting on your hip bones. True high rise sits at or just bellow the navel.

>>18475026
I apologize my good sir, I should have made it more clear that I was talking about the low rise fanatics who rage about high rise pants

>>18475017
Read what I was replying too, and you'll get the joke