Been styling like this guy because we have similar stats, but I feel like something is off here. Or is this a good fit?

I don't love tucked shirts with shorts. The rest is fine.

It's not bad, but it's decidedly meta. There's no one that thinks long big shorts, a shirt that opens up like a balloon after the midsection and loafers with an outfit this casual and disproportionate is actually a good look.
But it's very current and playful, so it's okay, even pleasant.

Slimming the pants slightly, shortening them, and a less extremely big shirt would make this outfit look more clean and more like there's actual effort being put in, but that's not the intent here, the intent here is to play with the current trends.

>>18472314 (OP)
No it isn't, look at those fucking shorts ffs, he could fit 3 more legs like his in there. Get something slimmer or hit the gym and do leg day every day.

>>18472323
Rapidly ageing millenial tier advice. Don't listen to this man he wants you to grow a nice big Coach Rip approved bubble butt.

>>18472314 (OP)
looks unfashionable, manchildish
bad taste everything in this pic really
nice tattoo you faggot

>>18472314 (OP)
Looks like an elementary schoolboy. Baggy shorts make your legs look like twigs.

>>18472364
What makes it bad though?

>>18472314 (OP)
I love tucking in shirts normally. But with shorts, the boy scout / schoolkid image is way too strong. Or, on the other end, boomer on the golf course. Long socks with shorts also looks childish.

this guy looks like a hitler youth manchild.

shirt is oversized, shorts are oversized, belt is gigantic. The way this outfit is put together, in combination with the slender hairless legs makes it look like a cross dressing woman with a mans face wearing a dress.

>>18472314 (OP)
if he smiled in the pic it would ruin the fit

>>18472412
the shorts. they should be shorter or he should wear pants.