Is lookism ruining fashion?

>hey guys how do i look the most attractive
>bro just do 3-5mm stubble
>get a short clean haircut
>dress like taylor swifts stylist is choosing clothes for her boyfriend
>viola
>anon now looks generically "handsome" without any personal style

I've noticed so many guys just trying to be generically hot and then losing any swag they may have had. It's like they perma-fuck themselves by playing a harder game just because women don't communicate well

>>18473513 (OP)
More than ever no, that's not the case.

>>18473513 (OP)
>seething negro seething
And whites stay on top.

>>18473513 (OP)
I'm going to hide this thread.

Just wanted to let you know.

This all comes from one's lack of sense of style though, which then translates into following the ideal without knowing what makes it appealing.

>>18473513 (OP)
This is literally what Stacies want.

>>18473513 (OP)
>anon now looks generically "handsome"
Better than "generic /fa/ggot."

>>18473513 (OP)
>ruining fashion
what's there to ruin?

If anything, it proves that swag is artificial and not inherent. Once the clothes come off, then what? Are you ugly or attractive naked? Did the girl (or guy) want to fuck you or the outfit?

White women like men who are inherent and not putting on an illusion. In the fashion world, that’s called peacocking and being a tryhard.

A proper outfit should compliment your inherent self, not replace who you are. Nobody gives a flying fuck if the blue pair of jeans you’re wearing are from Japan, but they would care if you look good in them.

The only time fashion itself should really matter is if it’s a hobby and if it makes you look good. When it comes to trends or subcultures be it Y2K goth, soft boy, old money, etc. is completely subjective and should be nothing more than simply having tastes like a hobby.

If you let “swag” take over, you lost and a corporation won.

>>18473513 (OP)
The left one mogs the rest.