it's actually good

>>18477412 (OP)
>SAAAAAARRRRRRRRRR

>>18477412 (OP)
shut up Praveen

except that it's really bad

>>18477412 (OP)
zara is better for basics
>>18477415
why do pajeets love h&m, i wonder

>>18477412 (OP)
Just go to arket

>>18477412 (OP)
I buy black jeans from there only because I can't find a better fitting pair elsewhere.

>>18477412 (OP)
No. They are literally the only brand I have ever had construction quality issues with. All those memes about "falls apart after 5 washes" are usually false and typically parrotted by clueless consoomers...for almost every brand on earth except H&M. I did actually have multiple garments become unwearable after ~5 washes. It's amazing really. Even my stuff from Walmart, Primark, and Zara are all totally fine.

Good morning sars

>when hm, zara and other shitty brands becomes quality fashion compared to shein and temu

H&M is pathetic. The styles range from boring to awful. Everything is so cheaply made that it isn't even worth the discount price tag.

It hasn’t been good since 2011 and a brief stint in 2014 when they copied early (non sporty) Rick Owens. After that it became a store for gay niggers and Latina Instagram bimbos unironically. Even the hiring practices were the epitome of DEI before people knew what DEI was.

>early 2010s H&M
>A tee shirt in every size and color. V neck or crew neck. Five bucks a pop.
>Office attire and Euro-centric clothing for roughly 40 dollars an item. Full suits too.
>Footwear from desert boots, Chelsea boots, even combat boots
>Actually sold coats
>Did not discriminate against hiring white men.

>nu H&M
>Instagram bullshit for brown people
>everything is in a salmon or peach color. Maybe black
>Swag clothing, hip hop apparel
>Tee shirts more expensive with less and less color options. Olive if you’re lucky.
>Men’s section shrinks
>Diversity hires to the extreme and extra feminist.

They turned into gay nigger version of GAP.

>>18477412 (OP)
It seems good for baby clothes since you can just buy clearance and children grow out of it in like 5 months. Dispoable clothes make sense for babys.

>>18478697
Yeah I remember when they just sold normal clothes for white people that was just cheap. You could buy like a cheap oxford or cheap chinos or a cheap sweater there. In a pinch it was fine especially for stuff you didn't care about. Now it's just for either gay wiggers or hispanics.

>>18478700
It was like a Hot Topic for adults without being shit like Urban Outfitters. You could get your skinny jeans, neon tees, etc. but you could also buy wingtips, a sweater with a Nordic pattern, and even a parka. Hell, I remember they had a long army parka that had a point in the back like a tailcoat and a fur lining on the hood.

I will not buy anything made in Bangladesh or Indonesia. Simple as.

Most of their stuff is equivalent to anything else in the same category of goods quality wise. Meaning, not much different than Uniqlo, better than Zara and similar quality to all mid-range brands (Nike, Adidas, Levi's you know whatever is your definition of mainstream brand). Some items occasionally are shit, but that's true for all fast fashion brands.

They have a huge variety of stuff too, but everything is very standard, as opposed to Zara which copies a lot of designs and iterates on them too, and you might find 10 different variations of western shirts over one season.

All that said, and despite not having any fundamental problems, it doesn't feel cool to wear h&m unless it's some special collab or print or what have you, and that's my main reason for not wearing much besides their underwear and socks.

>>18477412 (OP)
Some of their band shirts have pretty nice designs that feel actually worked on unlike most shirts sold by band themselves which are just their logo or the album cover slapped on the front

Not THAT bad but nothing crazy.

>>18479322
Anon hm clothing is significantly worse than those brands

>>18479625
NTA, but "quality wise," he is right. H&M isn't far off from Uniqlo or Zara. Uniqlo seems to get a free pass just because it's Japanese, but the quality just isn't there. Zara is more stylish than both, but Zara is also low quality garments.
>>18479322
>it doesn't feel cool to wear h&m
Because their styles are all outdated and haven't been updated in decades.

>>18477412 (OP)
lol nobody tell this pajeet

>>18479453
Does H&M sell Deftones shirts now?

>>18479643
Define quality in your estimation. Hm has worse fabrics and you can tell by just touching them.

>>18479453
Do they still sell this?

>>18479453
How dare you shit on deftones merch

>>18479790
Sorry, I took this example because i think it's a good shirt. But I was referring to Nick Cave merch which is absolute garbage, whereas what H&M sold was pretty good and fully unique design

>>18479786
>>18479680
I saw them in stores last year, alongside a lot of alt rock/metal bands like Korn, Smashing Pumpkins, The Cure, NIN, etc.

>>18478699
Imagine the plasticizers and hormone disruptors you're putting on your baby's skin.

>>18480043
never trust the (((swedes)))

>>18480043
As opposed to all the other clothing that you're buying that's made without any similar materials, right?
You seem extremely smart.

H&M but good is pic rel

>>18477412 (OP)
Buy an ad

>>18480043
Hm sells cotton clothing anon

I still have pants, shoes, and a bunch of button downs from them that i got around 2012-2014 that all have held up fine. The shoes have wear are nearing the end of their life but considering theyve been my main casual shoes i think over 10 years is pretty good