Thread 18483797 - /fa/ [Archived: 514 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/9/2025, 7:39:13 AM No.18483797
IMG_1414
IMG_1414
md5: 87225288e361bde68e43528b2a4dafad🔍
Despite American / Los Angeles Apparel being ran by a sleezy jackass, I lowkey miss this moment in fast fashion. Basic overpriced garments made in the USA. Take me back.
Replies: >>18484128
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 7:18:46 PM No.18484077
american-apparels-top-50-raciest
american-apparels-top-50-raciest
md5: 14f02b786ffd775c3615e9829715aa08🔍
the clothing was garbage quality.
dov charney is a jew who was dependent on illegal migrants and sold that as an ethical position, until he got cucked by obama era ice raids.

i do miss the times though, and hipsterdom at large.
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 7:48:51 PM No.18484101
IMG_1415
IMG_1415
md5: b2f2bcc491615459fa1155bff90e344d🔍
I have a few zip up hoodies where all my draw strings are missing and a few briefs.

I hate to say it, the ads got to me.
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 8:27:22 PM No.18484128
>>18483797 (OP)
i loved it BECAUSE it was run by a sleazy jackass
also every relatively fit looking woman looked amazing in their tight high waisted pants, this cope about low rise being better is lame as fuck
Replies: >>18484152 >>18484394
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 8:56:37 PM No.18484152
>>18484128
Totally depends on the girl imo. Girls that are actually naturally slender (narrow bone structure, small tits and ass, etc.) look erotic as fuck in low rise and shitty in anything else. Any girl with curves is the opposite. That's just jeans/pants though, IMO every girl that isn't fat looks better in low rise panties and bikinis.
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 5:13:32 AM No.18484394
>>18484128
Long thigh high socks made ANY goofy looking girl look hot as fuck.