Is 30W 32L the most aesthetic ratio?

Since that is what I wear, yes. Yes, it is.

tfw 29/28

I don't like the first number to be smaller than the second. I also don't like numbers that end in zero. 34x32 is very aesthetic.

>>18498543 (OP)
Anything above 28W is fatfuck territory, and I'm tired of pretending it's not.

>>18498543 (OP)
fuck no 32/32
>flexes

>>18498543 (OP)
Where is it sitting on your body though? Hip? Waist?

>>18498543 (OP)
I'm 31 32, based or cringe?

>>18498554
Fatass.
>>18498556
This but 30. I have big, muscular glutes.

>>18498556
I can't wear 28w because my hip bones simply don't fit. Unless you're a woman and talking about female sizes?

>>18498543 (OP)
I'm 30W 36L which is much more aesthetically pleasing.

>>18498616
>36L
Get the fuck outta here. Nobody makes those sizes unless they shop a specialty retailer or go to Big&Tall.

>>18498543 (OP)
If youre a 6'0" man this is literally perfect.

>be me
>6'1, ~160
>30 or 31w
>29 fucking inseam
my proportions are FUCKED bros

>>18498749
that can't be possible

>>18498543 (OP)
32x34 supremacy

>>18498749
You're supposed to measure your inseam from your actual crotch to ankles, not from the crotch of your gay ass sagged pants.

>>18498543 (OP)
30x29 reporting

>>18498543 (OP)
32x32 and I have had sex with more women than everyone in this thread combined

>>18498543 (OP)
All models seem to be 187 cm and wear 32x32, so there you have the answer to what is most appealing according to the science that fashion companies use.

>>18498543 (OP)
36x36 chad here

>>18498879
also at one point in my early 20s i was 40w 36L holy fuck i was fat as hell

>>18498543 (OP)
31x32 here :v)

>>18498616

I don’t know why but I’m 6’0” tall and can only wear 30L. 31L would be perfect but they’re impossible to find. 32L is just too long. I guess I have short legs or something.

>>18498881
40W is fat but it’s not like holy fuck fat. That’s like upper end of overweight lower end of clinically obese for a 5’10” to 6’2” male.

>>18498925
40 inch waist is definitely holy fuck fat

>>18498925
I'm 6'1" and felt like absolute sbit when I had a 36" waist.

>>18498705
American Tall is also a good option.

t. 30W 36L wigga

>>18499004
36 is pretty average for a 6 foot tall man. most guys i know that have any level of functional muscle are around that unless theyre some weird gymbrah or vegan

>>18498543 (OP)
Not sure about most aesthetic but I feel very normal and am happy that my size is always an option. Unfortunately it's also frequently out of stock.

i'm 6'3 195 (lean/muscular build not fat) and wear 36w 32 leg because it's most comfortable. dont fuck with pants that are tight at the calf and baggy around the ankles

>>18500706
you are definitely fat

>>18498926
Nah it’s like ~30% bf, just barely obese BMI. A guy with some muscle can have a 40” waist and look fat but not really fat.

26x22 reporting in (5’0”, 100 lb ftm)

I buy size 34 length 30 and belt it kek
t. 5'10 wiggermaxxer

34w 28l here

>>18498543 (OP)
30 34 masterrace

>>18498925
I’m 6’2” and when I was at my fattest, like 190lbs, 32 was still loose. You’re very fat.

>>18498556
>28W
I hate how most stores don't even stock 28W pants and I have to buy online and hope they fit

>>18498543 (OP)
>32L

>>18498543 (OP)

28W 32L

>>18498556
>30 is fatfuck
Aye lad, guess I'll go shave my hip bones down

>>18498616
34 is okay but 36 is insane. Is that with cuff/break or are you one of those dudes with freaky gangly legs who's pants are always too short? Genuinely curious about your MGK ass perportions, do you have calfs?

>>18501988
I am built like MGK. You didn't have to put it like that, man.

>>18501985
>>18498556
kek I have abs+squat and I wear 32 to 34 waist depending on brand. Not everyone has a tiny Twink body.