>>76245402>So you grand theory of prehistoric human nutrition is that the BULK of their calories came from...carbs anon, there is a lot of wild carbs, our prehistoric ancestors were hunter-GATHERERS, what do you think they were gathering? animals that just happened to die and lay around? Even in my kinda fucked up climatically part of the world there are wild fruit that are available until late fall/early winter, multiple year around starchy root plants like cattails, whole shit of edible greens we just stopped eating because they don't really taste that good if you are not starving, chestnuts and acorns (yes, those are edible), wild grains and so on which our stinky forebearers would gather and store for the worst months
>And these cavemen had a sophisticated system of I guess cycling and migration tied to the seasonal harvest of these wild plants, they literally did, it's a common archeological knowledge gained from site studies, what did you think "nomadic" means?
>and they also magically knew about the necessity of cooking to avoid antinutrients no magic there, if you eat something and get sick/die you don't eat it again, if you then throw it into a fire because "plant bad" and some idiot eats it anyway and not get sick/die from eating it you know you should throw it into a fire next before eating, trial and error over thousands of years
>and drank a lot of water there wasn't much else to drink around
>(which they got from prehistoric plastic bottles and tap) my bet is on a proto stanley cup made of mammoth foreskin
>to not die from oxalates.it is literally impossible to eat enough of anything containing those to die, worst you would get from overeating plants rich in oxalates is kidney stones and believe me, no one overate anything, food was scarce, hunger was common
>Or they just ate meat.they did that too, but to give you an idea about the proportions try chasing down a fruit vs an animal