Why did TUT-style training die?

>>76262700 (OP)
People started doing theoretical training instead of empirical training. They started listening to sctientism propaganda. Not just in lifting, it's in any and every sport now. Only the countries that have no western basedence are still successful and will overtake us over time.

Because science is bullshit. You will never accept this fact, yet it is true.

>>76262700 (OP)
Because it works and media wants you to be weak and soft for the future race wars.

>>76262700 (OP)
Mechanical tension is the solely driver of hypertrophy. TUT works wonders to increase fatigue and for that only. Although you should try it out if you think the trade off of maximized fatigue and everything that entails is worth the 0.0001% hypothetical gains that might be yet to be discovered through scientific method to be gained with TUTmaxxing.
>>76262747
Incoherent ramblings. Assumed deffensive stance before discourse had even started. Pathetic.

>>76262747
>Because science is bullshit. You will never accept this fact, yet it is true.
Holy BASED.

>>76262841
but what really is mechanical tension?

>>76262747
Good post. People have started disregarding what their body and lived experience tells them and blindly follow science , the religion of our days.

>>76262747
This is why I only do tut 2x2 to failure. Except for squats because I hate my knees and bounce off them like a trampoline.

King Tut was a dyel boy

>>76262700 (OP)
Because smooth-brains realized that doing bullshit purposefully-slow reps requires you to drop the weight/intensity. So you're not actually increasing any muscle stimulation, because the increased time under load is offset by the decreased intensity. So instead of doing stupid slow reps that take 30 seconds each, you might as well just go as intense as possible and try to get the weight up.

You will never ever see anyone get big and strong doing babby weights reaaaaallly really slowly. Simple as.

>>76262700 (OP)
Because it's shit for progressive overload it's only real benefit is injury avoidance and some endurance gains. That's great for geriatrics and rehab but it's not supremely mediocre for everyone who's not old or half crippled.

>>76262841
This nigga got WEAK tendons and ligaments.

>>76263024
Lifting heavy.

>>76263024
In the context of weightlifting you achieve of your muscle fibers going from a relaxed, extended position to contraction
>inb4 so then if I do it as fast as possible...
You shouldn't be able to go autistically fast. That's why you're working with weights. You regulate the weight so that you're always trying hard enough for at least 4 reps and at most, like, 10. Pretty much nothing is achieved in the last reps of a 'lighter' set high on reps

>>76263024
In the context of weightlifting you "achieve" mechanical tension when your muscle fibers going from a relaxed, extended position to contraction. To complete any movement you need mechanical tension, save from the relaxing part where you don't expend energy (i.e the concentric). e.g to go from an extended relaxed arm to levering your forearm over your elbow you're contracting your biceps and brachialis, through mechanical tension
>inb4 so then if I do it as fast as possible...
You shouldn't be able to go autistically fast. That's why you're working with weights. You regulate the weight so that you're always trying hard enough for at least 4 reps and at most, like, 10. Pretty much nothing is achieved in the last reps of a 'lighter' set high on reps
>>76263513
This is the TL;DR

>>76263594
>relaxing part where you don't expend energy (i.e the concentric). e.g to go from an extended relaxed arm to levering your forearm over your elbow you're contracting your biceps and brachialis, through mechanical tension
This is the polish retard

>>76263024
In the context of weightlifting you "achieve" mechanical tension when your muscle fibers going from a relaxed, extended position to contraction. To complete any movement you need mechanical tension, save from the relaxing part where you don't expend energy (only the concentric matters). e.g to go from an extended relaxed arm to levering your forearm over your elbow you're contracting your biceps and brachialis, through mechanical tension
>inb4 so then if I do it as fast as possible...
You shouldn't be able to go autistically fast. That's why you're working with weights. You regulate the weight so that you're always trying hard enough for at least 4 reps and at most, like, 10. Pretty much nothing is achieved in the last reps of a 'lighter' set high on reps
>>76263513 #
This is the TL;DR

>>76262747
you sound stupid

>>76263597
Damn I was just correcting the post again, why did you have to respond so quickly senpai
I'm not any poster you've interacted with earlier but my surname is Polish indeed. Genetics playing a role, maybe? :(

>>76263040
There is still a bunch of stupid broscience stuff that doesnt work and is a waste of time, like drop sets and rest pause sets.

>>76262747
>empirical training
this is still science
what you refer to as science is our government and large corporations buying research to control narratives and push products
this has been going on for newly a century now, but it's gotten really bad in the last decade or so

>>76265367
>empirical training
>this is still science
No. This is ridiculed as "bro science".

>what you refer to as science is our government and large corporations buying research to control narratives and push products
>this has been going on for newly a century now, but it's gotten really bad in the last decade or so
No, science has always been like that. You just noticed in the last decade. The replication crisis is over 20 years old, for example, you just ignored it. "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False " is from 2005.

>>76262700 (OP)
cause it's just slow reps of retarded as usual biceps curl

to get any TUT u need to make sure u've got tension on muscle belly in the first place
with bench for example u get ZERO, unless u butcher it like jay cutler did
>>76266088
>>76266086

for biceps curls u get zero time under tension on muscle belly because flexed front delt is poking long head of biceps shoulder tendon switching the muscle OFF, sure it tries to contract but it can't hold contraction, with long head sputtering conjoined short is also getting tut = 0, and all the brachialis and brachioradialis actually performing the motion (apart from flexed front delt) also get the slice of jackhammer action biceps is experiencing

>what if i wanted to actually get tut ON BICEPS
well then u hug basketball to your chest with pinky side of wrist unilaterally
>but does it grow long head of biceps
it is the best way i have found so far

>but why tut died
it was too powerful so it was shut down, u were told to perform idiotic complicated motions with big weight on retardo heavy stick instead

>>76263513
>>76263600
Nope. Lifting heavy is often times the opposite of mechanical tension. When you lift heavy, you instinctively do all the things that make it easier and less-taxing on the muscle. Sure the mechanical tension is there for your body as a whole but the specific muscle trained, not so much.

For example if you do as heavy bicep curls as you possibly can, you are going to be using your entire body, your back, your shoulders, even your fucking glutes and legs. So was the total mechanical tension on your body high? Sure but your biceps got the least bit of workout done. A much much bigger mechanical tension on your biceps alone would have been achieved by doing a lot lighter weight, where you actually use ONLY your biceps.

>>76266180
You're retarded m8. Stop posting.

>>76262700 (OP)
for me it's TOT